SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

More documents

Recommendations

Info

52 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 253 VARIATION IN SIZE AND PROPORTIONS: Both Méhely¨ (1901) and Parker (1934) gave the size (presumably SVL or close to that measurement) as 16.5 mm. Parker noted ‘‘ad.’’ but did not specify the sex. ILLUSTRATIONS: Whole body, dorsal aspect (Méhely¨, 1901: pl. XII, fig. 4); pectoral girdle (Méhely¨, 1901: pl. X, fig. 3). CALL: This has not been described. COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: This species must be compared with the sympatric A. mehelyi, but critical data are lacking. With only one specimen known, the possibly smaller size of polysticta cannot be confirmed. Méhely¨’s description and illustration suggest that polysticta has a shorter, blunter snout than mehelyi, and the mottled venter of that species contrasts with the unmarked abdomen of polysticta. If the illustration of polysticta is correctly proportioned, the legs are relatively shorter than those of mehelyi (TL/ SVL 0.39 vs. minimum of 0.42 in mehelyi). HABITAT AND HABITS: Nothing is on record. DISTRIBUTION: Sattleberg, the type and only locality, is the site of a mission station near the tip of the Huon Peninsula, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea (fig. 28). REMARKS: I have considered but rejected the possibility that Austrochaperina polysticta and A. mehelyi, small species of similar configuration with the same type locality, are synonyms. Both Méhely¨ and Parker, with specimens in hand, considered them as different taxa, and the geographically pertinent specimens I examined are closer to mehelyi in most respects. I prefer to maintain the status quo pending the acquisition of new material that favors reconsideration. Austrochaperina rivularis, new species Figure 31E Sphenophryne macrorhyncha: Zweifel, 1967: 6. Hyndman and Menzies, 1990: 272. HOLOTYPE: AMNH A130551 (Field No. RZ 12802), collected by Fred Parker and Papuan assistants at Finalbin, 840 m, 5 km N, 2 km W Tabubil, Western Province, Papua New Guinea, on July 27, 1987. PARATYPES (all from Papua New Guinea): Western Prov.: AMNH A130552–130559, UPNG 8273, same data as holotype; AMNH A84541, A84542; MCZ A81000, 81224– 81230, 81451, 81452, Imigabip, 1280 m, collected by Fred Parker, Dec. 1969; AMNH A84543; MCZ A81002, 81003, Bolangon, 1280 m, collected by Fred Parker, Dec. 1969; MCZ A81001, Migalsimbip, 790 m, collected by Fred Parker, Dec. 1969. West Sepik Prov.: QM J67247, 67255, Mt. Stolle, 1600 m, collected by Stephen Richards and G. R. Johnston, July 4, 1993. East Sepik Prov.: AMNH A77550–77588, A84445 (C&S), A129514–129558, Mt. Hunstein, 1220 m, collected by Ru Hoogland Aug. 14–15, 1966. Southern Highlands Prov.: AMS R122164, R122165, Namosado, collected by S. Donnellan. ETYMOLOGY: The specific name is a Latin adjective pertaining to small brooks or streams, in reference to the habitat of this species. DIAGNOSIS: A moderate- to large-sized Austrochaperina, maturing at 35 mm SVL or larger (geographically variable), with relatively large finger discs (FD/SVL 0.035), moderate leg length and eye size (TL/SVL 0.46, EY/SVL 0.116), and a dorsal pattern of small, dark markings on a slightly paler ground. DESCRIPTION OF HOLOTYPE: Adult female with the following measurements and proportions: SVL 49.0, HW 17.1, TL 21.8, EY 4.8, EN 3.4, IN 4.8, HD 12.6, FT 23.8, third finger disc 1.95, fourth toe disc 2.3; HW/ SVL 0.349, TL/SVL 0.445, EY/SVL 0.098, EN/SVL 0.069, IN/SVL 0.098, EN/IN 0.708, HD/SVL 0.257, FT/SVL 0.486, FD/SVL 0.040, TD/SVL 0.047. Head narrower than body. Snout rounded to almost subacute seen from above, rounded and slightly projecting in profile; loreal region moderately steep, slightly concave, canthus rostralis rounded but distinct; nostrils lateral, just visible from above, slightly closer to tip of snout than to eye. Eyes relatively large, outline visible from beneath, lid almost as wide as interorbital span. Tympanic outline scarcely visible, diameter less than half that of eye. Relative lengths of fingers 3 4 2 1, first more than half length of second, all with expanded, rounded, grooved discs, that of third finger twice width of penultimate phalanx or a little less; subarticular and metacarpal elevations indistinct. Toes
2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPHRYNE 53 unwebbed, relative lengths 4 3 5 2 1, all with discs larger than those of fingers, that of fourth toe about twice width of penultimate phalanx; subarticular elevations low, rounded, scarcely evident; inner metatarsal elevation small, elongate, rounded. Skin smooth above and below except for very weak, diagonal postorbital fold. Purplish brown above in preservative with a few darker flecks, weak, convergent dark lines in the scapular region, and an ill-defined dark stripe above the postocular fold. The fingers and toes are marked with dark and light in no particular pattern. The ventral ground color is pale tan with gray-brown mottling from chin to posterior tip of abdomen as well as beneath the limbs. The intensity of the mottling is slightly less on the abdomen than elsewhere. VARIATION IN TYPE SERIES: Populations referred to A. rivularis have different maximum body sizes. The sample from Western Province includes apparently immature males (no vocal slits) of 30.2 and 31.5 mm, mature males of 35.7 and 36.5 mm, females just maturing at 35.9 and 36.9 mm, and adult females of 39.1 to 49 mm. Several males from Mt. Hunstein, East Sepik Province, in the range of 39–45 mm lack vocal slits whereas others 42–45 mm have them. Whether this indicates variability in the vocal apparatus of adult males or variability in size at maturity is not evident, but the greater size of males in this sample is clear. The series of females from Mt. Hunstein includes a juvenile as large as 44.0 mm, one maturing at 44.8 mm and adults 47.6–51.5 mm. Proportions of specimens in the two major samples are quite similar (table 2). Regression data are in table 3. In life, frogs from Western Province were scarcely more distinctively colored than in preservative, being olive-brown above with darker brown markings, a faint lumbar ocellus, and the tympanic area pale yellowish tan. Undersides were gray-brown with faint darker mottling most evident on the chin. The iris is dark golden brown above and below the horizontal pupil, little differentiated from the dorsal color. REFERRED SPECIMENS: SAMA 6385–6403, 6409–6414, 6416–6418, collected by Barry Craig at Busilmin, West Sepik Province, on May 7, 1965. I lack a complete suite of measurements on these specimens and thus could not make critical comparisons. Although I exclude them from paratype designation, it is likely that they represent this species. ILLUSTRATIONS: 3rd finger terminal phalanx, fig. 71O; premaxilla, fig. 63F; sacral region, fig. 73A; vomer, fig. 65N; skull, fig. 68A; hand and foot, fig. 56A. CALL: Through the courtesy of Stephen Richards, I have tape recordings of the calls of two individuals of this species and have examined one of the voucher specimens. The call (fig. 79B, table 5) is a series of harsh notes each about 0.06–0.08 sec long, composed of six to eight pulses, and repeated at a rate of about three notes per second. Individual notes characteristically begin with a long pulse, followed by others half its length (fig. 80C), although occasional notes have all the pulses approximately the same length (see Vocalizations). The dominant frequency is approximately 2600 Hz in one instance and 2700 in the other. One complete call (i.e., initiated after recording began and terminated voluntarily) lasted 1 min 25 sec; the other (presumably incomplete) call was at least 38 sec long. Both frogs called from beside small creeks. The air temperature recorded for one call was 21.3C. Stephen Richards recorded one of the frogs at 1600 m on Mt. Stolle, West Sepik (Sanduan) Prov., the other about 5 km west of Tabubil (elevation about 600 m by my estimate and close to the type locality), Western Prov. The localities are about 75 km apart. COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: Austrochaperina rivularis is compared with two similar species—macrorhyncha and palmipes—in the accounts of those species. The two species basipalmata and derongo are smaller, with maximum male and female sizes approximating the sizes at which rivularis matures. Presence of toe webbing distinguishes basipalmata, and average tibia length, eye, hand, and disc sizes are smaller in derongo. HABITAT AND HABITS: The frogs found at Finalbin, when uncovered from beneath leaves lying beside small streams in mossy, hilly forest, jumped into the water and swam well in attempting escape. Except for the
Page 1 and 2: PARTITION OF THE AUSTRALOPAPUAN MIC
Page 3 and 4: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
Page 51: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
Page 103 and 104:
2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
show all

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?