04.10.2013 Views

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 253<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Parker (1934) distinguished Sphenophryne from other genera <strong>of</strong> the Genyophryninae<br />

(Sphenophryninae in his work) by its pectoral girdle having a more nearly complete complement<br />

<strong>of</strong> bony and cartilaginous elements. Otherwise, the species he placed there were a diverse<br />

lot, including ones adapted for climbing, for living in or on leaf litter, or for a cryptic, even<br />

burrowing existence. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the pectoral girdle are primitive compared to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> other genyophrynine genera, which have reduced or lost one or more <strong>of</strong> the elements. Thus,<br />

the common possession <strong>of</strong> a primitive girdle is inadequate as the sole character defining the<br />

genus. In the present work I review species with the supposedly diagnostic character <strong>of</strong> Sphenophryne<br />

and recognize four genera: Sphenophryne (monotypic), and three removed from synonymy—Austrochaperina<br />

(23 species), Liophryne (6 species), and Oxydactyla (5 species). The<br />

characters I use to define the genera are for the most part closely tied to the habits <strong>of</strong> the<br />

species and thus are subject to the criticism that homoplasy rather than synapomorphy is<br />

demonstrated. Regardless, the probability that the new arrangement identifies four monophyletic<br />

lines is considerably greater than that Sphenophryne, as it has been constituted, is monophyletic.<br />

Sphenophryne, Liophryne, and Oxydactyla are confined to New Guinea. Austrochaperina<br />

has one species on New Britain, four endemic to northern Australia, one shared between<br />

Australia and New Guinea, and 18 on New Guinea and adjacent islands. The genus and species<br />

Microbatrachus pusillus, based on a hatchling from the Aru Islands, are considered unidentifiable.<br />

Of the 35 species recognized, 17 are described as new and one is removed from<br />

synonymy.<br />

In his classic monograph <strong>of</strong> the Microhylidae,<br />

Parker (1934) recognized the genus<br />

Sphenophryne with 10 species found in Australia<br />

and New Guinea and considered three<br />

genera as synonymous to it. 1 In more than<br />

six decades since, the only taxonomic modification<br />

at the generic level was the synonymization<br />

<strong>of</strong> Microbatrachus (which Parker<br />

recognized) with Sphenophryne (Tyler,<br />

1978). The number <strong>of</strong> included species has<br />

risen from 10 to 18, mostly through discovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> new species (listed in Zweifel, 1985a,<br />

with an additional species in Zweifel,<br />

1985b). Parker’s diagnostic feature <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />

within the subfamily Sphenophryninae<br />

(Genyophryninae <strong>of</strong> current authors) was<br />

that the pectoral girdle had a more nearly<br />

complete set <strong>of</strong> ventral elements than did the<br />

1 Parker (1934: 159) also reported a ‘‘?Sphenophryne<br />

sp.’’ based on embryos ‘‘collected from the pitcher <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Nepenthes at Kuching [Sarawak],’’ far from the known<br />

range <strong>of</strong> any genyophrynine microhylid. It is likely that<br />

this extralimital record is based on a rhacophorid, possibly<br />

Philautus, which oviposits in Nepenthes and whose<br />

larvae may metamorphose prior to hatching; see Dring<br />

(1979: 207–208) and Inger and Stuebing (1997: 163).<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

other genera he recognized 2 : coracoids, clavicles<br />

that extend from the scapula to near the<br />

midline, procoracoid cartilages, and a cartilaginous<br />

sternum.<br />

The set <strong>of</strong> features described for the pectoral<br />

girdle is unquestionably primitive compared<br />

to the more reduced states in all other<br />

genyophrynine genera and thus cannot diagnose<br />

a monophyletic clade. Species currently<br />

assigned to Sphenophryne on the sole<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> girdle structure are a diverse lot morphologically<br />

and ecologically, and they include<br />

scansorial, riparian, and terrestrial<br />

forms. The inevitable impression is that they<br />

may not be a monophyletic group. My principal<br />

objective has been to examine the suite<br />

<strong>of</strong> genyophrynine species with the primitive<br />

pectoral girdle, including several undescribed<br />

and synonymized taxa, in order to see if phylogenetic<br />

sense can be made and a defensible<br />

arrangement can be proposed that does not<br />

depend on shared primitive characters. Additional<br />

objectives were to identify and describe<br />

previously unrecognized species, to<br />

assess the status <strong>of</strong> names in synonymy, and<br />

2 Oreophryne,<br />

Aphantophryne.<br />

Microbatrachus, Cophixalus, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!