04.10.2013 Views

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />

61<br />

have a dark-edged, narrow, pale, midvertebral<br />

line imposed on the more basic pattern<br />

described. Five specimens have a dark figure<br />

that involves the top <strong>of</strong> the head and snout,<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the eyelids, and occupies the middorsal<br />

region, where its irregular but well-defined<br />

edges set it <strong>of</strong>f abruptly from the paler<br />

dorsolateral region. Both polymorphism and<br />

individual color change (arrested by preservation)<br />

may be involved.<br />

ILLUSTRATIONS: 3rd finger terminal phalanx,<br />

fig. 71F; premaxilla, fig. 63E; hyoid,<br />

fig. 70; sacral region, fig. 72E; vomer, fig.<br />

65E; skull, fig. 68C; hand and foot, fig. 54B.<br />

CALL: An average call is a train <strong>of</strong> about<br />

23 short (0.03 sec) notes uttered at 15 per<br />

sec over a period <strong>of</strong> 1.5 sec (fig. 78A, table<br />

8). Individual notes are unpulsed, with an<br />

abrupt rise in frequency and a less abrupt<br />

fall, with the dominant energy occurring in<br />

the region <strong>of</strong> 2600–2900 Hz. One individual<br />

initiated calls at an average interval <strong>of</strong> 46.8<br />

sec (35.9–58.9, N 7), another at 35.5 sec<br />

(26.7–51.8, N 4). Temperature was virtually<br />

the same in both instances (16.4 and<br />

16.5C, respectively). There is no indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> an influence <strong>of</strong> temperature on call characteristics,<br />

but the temperature range in the<br />

sample is narrow (3.2C).<br />

COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: Details<br />

in the Diagnosis should suffice to separate<br />

allisoni from other Liophryne. The more<br />

prominent subarticular elevations <strong>of</strong> allisoni<br />

and its high TL/SVL ratio will distinguish it<br />

from Austrochaperina <strong>of</strong> similar size.<br />

HABITAT AND HABITS: Gressitt and Nadkarni’s<br />

(1978) description <strong>of</strong> the vegetation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mt. Kaindi is illustrated with cross sec-<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> forest at 1790 and 1880 m, within<br />

the zone occupied by Liophryne allisoni. The<br />

forest, on a steep ground with a ground cover<br />

<strong>of</strong> leaves, moss and ferns, has an irregular<br />

canopy 27–29 m high. Brass (1964: 201)<br />

characterized the forest at Arau as ‘‘a transition<br />

between mid-mountain fagaceous forest<br />

and a lower montane mixed rain forest<br />

. . . rich in herbaceous undergrowth.’’<br />

I found the holotype in the daytime beneath<br />

a small log. Frogs tape-recorded by Allen<br />

Allison were beneath leaves on the forest<br />

floor, and one that I recorded (but that eluded<br />

four surrounding herpetologists) was deep in<br />

roadside grass. The habitus <strong>of</strong> this species—<br />

especially the long legs and large eyes—suggest<br />

that it is more a frog <strong>of</strong> the leaf litter<br />

rather than a truly burrowing form. This is<br />

consistent with what is known <strong>of</strong> other Liophryne.<br />

DISTRIBUTION: Liophryne allisoni is<br />

known from localities in Papua New Guinea<br />

spanning 150 km between the eastern edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> Eastern Highlands Province and the vicinity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wau, Morobe Province (fig. 28).<br />

The known range in elevation is 1400–2000<br />

m. The upper limit, at least, may be approximately<br />

correct, as this frog has not been<br />

taken in the summit region <strong>of</strong> Mt. Kaindi<br />

(2362 m) despite much collecting there. For<br />

locality data, see Holotype and Paratypes<br />

above.<br />

REMARKS: Members <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Archbold<br />

Expedition (1959) were the first to collect<br />

this species. The majority <strong>of</strong> specimens and<br />

tape recordings resulted from the efforts <strong>of</strong><br />

Allen Allison, working out <strong>of</strong> the Wau Ecology<br />

Institute.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!