Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2006 / 2007

Percent
Julian Date
Julian Date
Height (cm)
Height (cm)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
150
148
146
144
142
140
148
146
144
142
140
138
115
113
111
109
107
105
88
86
84
82
80
78
T R E E I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M
Figure 4: Percent seedling damage at the PGTIS plantation after the
first winter by damage class and female x male parent source
KALxKAL K ALxPG PGxKAL PGxPG
none
50%
dead
Figure 5: Mean (±standard Female errors) x Male Julian Source date of bud burst for the WANSA
plantation for each of the four female x male parent sources.
KALxKA L KALxPG PGxKAL PGxPG
Figure 6: Mean (±standard
Female
errors) Julian
x Male
date
Source
of bud burst for the PGTIS
plantation for each of the four female x male parent sources.
KALxKA L KALxPG P GxK AL P GxP G
Female x Male Source
Figure 7: Mean (±standard errors) height growth (cm) for the WANSA plantation
for each of the four female x male parent sources.
Mean Seven Year Heights (WANSA Plantation)
KALxKA L KALxPG P GxK AL P GxP G
Female x Male Source
Figure 8: Mean (±standard errors) height growth (cm) for the PGTIS plantation
for each of the four female x male parent sources.
Mean Seven Year Heights (PGTIS Plantation)
KALxKAL KALxPG PGxK AL PGxPG
Female x Male Source
P R O J E C T R E P O R T 2 0 0 6 / 2 0 0 7
F gure . Percent seedl ng damage at the PGTIS
plantat on after the first w nter by damage class and
female x male parent source.
F gure . Mean (± standard errors) Jul an date of
bud burst for the WANSA plantat on for each of the
four female x male parent sources.
F gure 6. Mean (± standard errors) Jul an date of
bud burst for the PGTIS plantat on for each of the
four female x male parent sources.
F gure 7. Mean (± standard errors) he ght growth
(cm) for the WANSA plantat on for each of the four
female x male parent sources.
F gure . Mean (± standard errors) he ght growth
(cm) for the WANSA plantat on for each of the four
female x male parent sources.
7