13.10.2013 Views

Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2006 / 2007

Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2006 / 2007

Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2006 / 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L st of F gures<br />

T R E E I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M<br />

Figure 1. Relationship between FGC Strategic Plan, FIA-TIP, and participants in various forest<br />

gene resource management areas. ................................................................................................................... xi<br />

Figure 2. Schematic of organizational relationships among FGC, FIA, SelectSeed and seed users. ................. 1<br />

Figure 3. Percentage of Reforested Area Planted with Select Seed, by Management Unit ............................... 3<br />

Figure 4. Levels of self-pollination in northern peripheral, central, and southern peripheral continuous<br />

and disjunct populations of Sitka spruce. ....................................................................................................... 7<br />

Figure 5. Locations of Pacific dogwood (left) and Garry oak (right). .............................................................. 7<br />

Figure 6. Heights of coastal Douglas-fir at age 12 for seedlings in three genetic classes across four sites. ........ 8<br />

Figure 7. Volume at age 11 at Sutton Creek versus damage at Mt. Cain in high-elevation families<br />

progeny test. .................................................................................................................................................... 9<br />

Figure 8. View of realized-gain test at Norrish (Harrison area). ...................................................................... 9<br />

Figure 9. Armillaria fruiting bodies on artificially inoculated Interior Douglas-fir test seedling. ................... 14<br />

Figure 10. Thirty-year-old Arizona provenance showing extreme maladaptation to the Trinity Valley site. . 14<br />

Figure 11. Forward selections in the D’Arcy provenance in the Trinity Valley provenance test. .................... 14<br />

Figure 12. Picking pollen from forward selected trees in the Trinity Valley range-wide provenance test ....... 14<br />

Figure 13. Ten-year-old Series I Interior spruce second-generation progeny test near Prince George, BC. ......15<br />

Figure 14. One-year-old Interior spruce Series II progeny test at Prince George <strong>Tree</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> Station. . 16<br />

Figure 15. Subapline larch growing at Pedley Pass near Invermere, BC. ........................................................ 16<br />

Figure 16. Subalpine larch ex-situ gene conservation/breeding archive at Kalamalka Forestry Centre. .......... 17<br />

Figure 17. Example of possible genetic worth responses of seedlots from two seed orchards based on two<br />

climate variables. .......................................................................................................................................... 18<br />

Figure 18. A controlled pollination crop is managed in the western redcedar seed orchard at Saanich<br />

Forestry Centre to address the effects of selfing and to assist in midge control. ............................................. 21<br />

Figure 19. The <strong>2007</strong> low elevation western hemlock crop at the Saanich Forestry Centre. ........................... 21<br />

Figure 20. The Saanich Forestry Centre high elevation western hemlock orchard. ....................................... 22<br />

Figure 21. Douglas-fir and western redcedar potted grafts. ........................................................................... 24<br />

Figure 22. Installing drainage in orchard 233. .............................................................................................. 28<br />

Figure 23. Crew applies pollen to Pli orchard 338. ........................................................................................ 30<br />

Figure 24. PRT seed orchard staff in Fdi orchard 321. .................................................................................. 30<br />

Figure 25. Collecting Pli using Girette. ......................................................................................................... 31<br />

Figure 26. Squirrel activity in the unmanaged white pine orchard (607), <strong>Project</strong> 1503. ............................... 33<br />

Figure 27. Temporary irrigation in the Ribes garden during white pine seedling inoculation, <strong>Project</strong> 411. .... 33<br />

Figure 28. Burning to reduce the fire risk at Skimikin. <strong>Project</strong> 4057 E13. .................................................... 33<br />

Figure 29. Mean daily western red cedar pollen catch for five regional Saanich peninsula sites. .................... 38<br />

Figure 30. Mean daily western red cedar pollen catch at WFP lower reservoir site........................................ 38<br />

Figure 31. Mean daily western red cedar pollen catch in WFP orchard 189. ................................................. 38<br />

Figure 32. Mean daily western red cedar pollen catch in the TW Mount Newton orchard site 140. ............ 39<br />

Figure 33. SMP on Lower Crown Cones Effect on Total Seed per Cone (TSPC). ........................................ 43<br />

Figure 34. SMP on Lower Crown Cones Effect on Filled Seed per Cone (FSPC)......................................... 43<br />

Figure 35. Control Cross Pollination on Lower Crown Cones Effect on Total Seed per Cone (TSPC). ........ 43<br />

Figure 36. Control Cross Pollination on Lower Crown Cones Effect on Filled Seed per Cone (FSPC). ....... 43<br />

P R O J E C T R E P O R T 2 0 0 6 / 2 0 0 7<br />

v

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!