Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
one, showing the 35mm prints <strong>of</strong> 68mm originals from the NFTVA and<br />
NFM collections. The essence <strong>of</strong> such programmes must be variety, and<br />
there is always a danger <strong>of</strong> boring the audience with a programme <strong>of</strong><br />
films by one company or all <strong>of</strong> the same kind. But the timing was just<br />
right, and the show built up to a fine climax with some outstanding<br />
NFM prints including Pope Leo XIII blessing the audience, scenes from<br />
the trial <strong>of</strong> Alfred Dreyfus, and an exhilarating view <strong>of</strong> a speeding train<br />
from another train moving just ahead <strong>of</strong> it. An amazing view from a<br />
moving tram along Ealing Broadway, London (which came from a private<br />
collection), made a great ending for a London audience. We made a<br />
point <strong>of</strong> ending each show, if possible, with a special item or surprise.<br />
The war programme was the best attended after the Lumière show. The<br />
film historian Stephen Bottomore gave an informative opening presentation<br />
on the first war cameramen; the programme had as its centrepiece<br />
the Anglo-Boer War <strong>of</strong> 1899-1902, though it was noticeable how very<br />
few <strong>of</strong> the films showed any sort <strong>of</strong> actual military activity at all, making<br />
W.K.L. Dickson’s view <strong>of</strong> the retreat <strong>of</strong> the British from Spion Kop all the<br />
more extraordinary; one <strong>of</strong> the great early film scoops. Perhaps the most<br />
interesting aspect <strong>of</strong> the programme was the audience reaction to the<br />
‘fake’ war films on show. It is common to express surprise that anyone in<br />
the contemporary audience would have been fooled by such crude recreations.<br />
It was remarkable then that some members <strong>of</strong> the sophisticated<br />
NFT audience had to ask the lecturer which films they were seeing were<br />
genuine and which fake. One person, perhaps not blessed with perfect<br />
eyesight, came up afterwards and thanked us for showing film <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Spithead naval review <strong>of</strong> 1897 in which he had recognised unique film<br />
<strong>of</strong> a particular boat in which he was interested. In fact we had shown an<br />
Edison recreation with models <strong>of</strong> a naval incident in the Russo-Japanese<br />
war <strong>of</strong> 1905 in a rather unclear 16mm paper print. Perhaps the audience<br />
has not changed all that much in the past 100 years.<br />
The least successful show was Sport and Recreation, because the audience<br />
interested in sport were not interested in the general scenes <strong>of</strong><br />
travel that filled out the programme, which in any case became a little<br />
too much the programme where everything was placed that did not fit<br />
elsewhere. A particularly awkward moment came when it was discovered<br />
that someone was secretly and illicitly filming the sports films from the<br />
front row. A very difficult situation to deal with when also trying to comment<br />
on films that are passing by in thirty seconds. The highlight was<br />
scenes from the James Corbett-Bob Fitzsimmons world heavyweight<br />
boxing contest <strong>of</strong> 1897, in widescreen format, though sadly missing the<br />
essential knockout. The home movies <strong>of</strong> the Passmore family, dating<br />
from 1902 but allowed to slip into our Victorian net on account <strong>of</strong> their<br />
great charm, made a delightful conclusion to the programme.<br />
The final Discoveries show was really three short programmes put<br />
together, though the formula worked. We opened with a reel <strong>of</strong> unidentified<br />
films – always a risk since there is less to engage the audience, but<br />
one may hope for clues to identification, and it is good to put such films<br />
back into the collective consciousness. A selection <strong>of</strong> scientific and med-<br />
67 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong> / 53 / 1996