04.11.2013 Views

A THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL XLIV 2002 Published by the Protestant ...

A THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL XLIV 2002 Published by the Protestant ...

A THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL XLIV 2002 Published by the Protestant ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TONY CARROLL SJ<br />

arguments and points of view from being heard. The ëdemocratically<br />

enlightened common senseí is a form of referee who ensures that <strong>the</strong><br />

exchange of ideas between <strong>the</strong> state and religions is carried out under<br />

<strong>the</strong> rules of ëfair playí. 28 However, in order for religions to play <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

part in <strong>the</strong> formation of public opinion, Habermas suggests that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

must disavow violence as a means for expressing <strong>the</strong>ir religious views<br />

and also <strong>the</strong>y need to subscribe to three basic principles which would<br />

constitute a basis for democratic potential in a religion. The first is<br />

<strong>the</strong> serious reflection on <strong>the</strong> truth claims of o<strong>the</strong>r religions, or in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, <strong>the</strong> commitment to inter-religious dialogue as a form of democratic<br />

approach. Second, <strong>the</strong> recognition of <strong>the</strong> validity of social science<br />

descriptions of modern society. Third, <strong>the</strong> recognition of <strong>the</strong><br />

legitimacy of <strong>the</strong> secular basis of <strong>the</strong> modern constitutional state.<br />

When <strong>the</strong>se three basic characteristics are accepted <strong>by</strong> religions <strong>the</strong>n,<br />

according to Habermas, <strong>the</strong>y are potentially capable of contributing<br />

to <strong>the</strong> democratic debate in a constructive manner.<br />

These fundamental characteristics can be considered to be basic<br />

rules of <strong>the</strong> game, so to speak, for a post-secular society. Both sides,<br />

that is to say, <strong>the</strong> secular-scientific and <strong>the</strong> religious points of view,<br />

need to respect <strong>the</strong>se rules of exchange and this is something which<br />

should be mediated <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> democratically enlightened common sense<br />

of <strong>the</strong> public sphere. Habermas mentions <strong>the</strong> current debate occurring<br />

about genetic manipulation as an example of where this debate is<br />

most urgent and should not simply be left to scientific experts to<br />

decide but ra<strong>the</strong>r, through fair assessment of <strong>the</strong> democratic exchange<br />

of <strong>the</strong> arguments of all sides, should be decided <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> democratic<br />

public sphere. In this context, secularisation no longer means <strong>the</strong><br />

disappearance of religion but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> liberation of <strong>the</strong> public sphere<br />

from <strong>the</strong> undemocratic control of religion. Society, here, is described<br />

as post-traditional in that it is based on positive law and democratic<br />

principles which derive from a number of different sources and not<br />

28 The idea of democratically enlightened common sense draws on <strong>the</strong> conception<br />

of <strong>the</strong> public sphere that Habermas developed in his earlier work such as <strong>the</strong> Structural<br />

Transformation of <strong>the</strong> Public Sphere, originally published in†1962. It is essentially<br />

a regulative principle, that is to say, a normative basis for modern democratic<br />

societies. In acting as a normative basis it can be used critically to intervene in<br />

inappropriate, and that means undemocratic for Habermas, interventions in <strong>the</strong> public<br />

sphere.<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!