25.12.2013 Views

-210 Nottingham - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

-210 Nottingham - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

-210 Nottingham - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 1.1 Process <strong>of</strong> nuclear transfer<br />

Figure 1.2 Main reproductive hormones as to oocytes<br />

Figure 1.3 Changes in maturation promoting factor (MPF) and cytostatic factor (CSF)<br />

activities during meiotic divisions <strong>of</strong> oocytes<br />

and mitotic divisions <strong>of</strong> early zygotes<br />

Figure 1.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> nuclear transfer <strong>of</strong> karyoplasts at defined cell cycle stages into<br />

cytoplasts with either high (group A) or low (group B) MPF activity upon<br />

DNA synthesis during the first cell cycle and potential effects upon the ploidy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reconstructed embryo<br />

Figure 1.5 Flow chart <strong>of</strong> the experimental design<br />

Figure 2.1 Diagram <strong>of</strong> micromanipulation instruments and manipultion set up<br />

Figure 2.2 Enucleation <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes at telophase <strong>of</strong> first meiotic division (TI)<br />

Figure 2.3 Production <strong>of</strong> oocyte-somatic cell couplets by cell transfer<br />

Figure 3.1 Classification <strong>of</strong> meiotic stages <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes by nuclear<br />

morphology<br />

Figure 3.2 Morphology <strong>of</strong> control, CHX and cAMP treated COCs during<br />

maturation<br />

Figure 3.3 Distribution <strong>of</strong> meiotic progression (mean ± SEM) in control, CHX and<br />

cAMP treatments during maturation<br />

Figure 3.4 <strong>The</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong> MII oocytes (mean ± SEM) in control, CHX and cAMP<br />

treatments during maturation<br />

Figure 4.1 Morphology <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes and parthenotes in control or synchronised<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

groups<br />

Meiotic changes <strong>of</strong> oocytes (mean ± SEM) in control and cAMP treatments<br />

at different time points<br />

Figure 5.1 Timeline <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes with caffeine during<br />

somatic cell nuclear transfer<br />

Figure 5.2 MPF and MAPK activities in porcine oocytes detected with an in vitro<br />

double-kinase assay by phosphorylation <strong>of</strong> histone HI and MBP, respectively<br />

Figure 5.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> different caffeine concentrations on MPF and MAPK activities<br />

in TI and early MII porcine oocytes<br />

Figure 5.4 Morphology <strong>of</strong> parthenotes from oocytes treated wit different<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> caffeine<br />

Figure 5.5 Total cell number counting <strong>of</strong> blastocyst stage embryos from oocytes treated<br />

Figure 5.6<br />

Figure 5.7<br />

with different concentrations <strong>of</strong> caffeine by DAPI staining<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> 5 mM caffeine on MPF and MAPK activities in TI enucleated<br />

porcine oocytes<br />

Hatching porcine SCNT blastocyst<br />

x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!