-210 Nottingham - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
-210 Nottingham - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
-210 Nottingham - Nottingham eTheses - The University of Nottingham
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure 1.1 Process <strong>of</strong> nuclear transfer<br />
Figure 1.2 Main reproductive hormones as to oocytes<br />
Figure 1.3 Changes in maturation promoting factor (MPF) and cytostatic factor (CSF)<br />
activities during meiotic divisions <strong>of</strong> oocytes<br />
and mitotic divisions <strong>of</strong> early zygotes<br />
Figure 1.4 Effects <strong>of</strong> nuclear transfer <strong>of</strong> karyoplasts at defined cell cycle stages into<br />
cytoplasts with either high (group A) or low (group B) MPF activity upon<br />
DNA synthesis during the first cell cycle and potential effects upon the ploidy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the reconstructed embryo<br />
Figure 1.5 Flow chart <strong>of</strong> the experimental design<br />
Figure 2.1 Diagram <strong>of</strong> micromanipulation instruments and manipultion set up<br />
Figure 2.2 Enucleation <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes at telophase <strong>of</strong> first meiotic division (TI)<br />
Figure 2.3 Production <strong>of</strong> oocyte-somatic cell couplets by cell transfer<br />
Figure 3.1 Classification <strong>of</strong> meiotic stages <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes by nuclear<br />
morphology<br />
Figure 3.2 Morphology <strong>of</strong> control, CHX and cAMP treated COCs during<br />
maturation<br />
Figure 3.3 Distribution <strong>of</strong> meiotic progression (mean ± SEM) in control, CHX and<br />
cAMP treatments during maturation<br />
Figure 3.4 <strong>The</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong> MII oocytes (mean ± SEM) in control, CHX and cAMP<br />
treatments during maturation<br />
Figure 4.1 Morphology <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes and parthenotes in control or synchronised<br />
Figure 4.2<br />
groups<br />
Meiotic changes <strong>of</strong> oocytes (mean ± SEM) in control and cAMP treatments<br />
at different time points<br />
Figure 5.1 Timeline <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong> porcine oocytes with caffeine during<br />
somatic cell nuclear transfer<br />
Figure 5.2 MPF and MAPK activities in porcine oocytes detected with an in vitro<br />
double-kinase assay by phosphorylation <strong>of</strong> histone HI and MBP, respectively<br />
Figure 5.3 Effects <strong>of</strong> different caffeine concentrations on MPF and MAPK activities<br />
in TI and early MII porcine oocytes<br />
Figure 5.4 Morphology <strong>of</strong> parthenotes from oocytes treated wit different<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> caffeine<br />
Figure 5.5 Total cell number counting <strong>of</strong> blastocyst stage embryos from oocytes treated<br />
Figure 5.6<br />
Figure 5.7<br />
with different concentrations <strong>of</strong> caffeine by DAPI staining<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> 5 mM caffeine on MPF and MAPK activities in TI enucleated<br />
porcine oocytes<br />
Hatching porcine SCNT blastocyst<br />
x