The Application of Ooubled Haploid Plants to Population ... - MSpace

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...$

Jasieniuk, M., Brill&Babel, AL. and Momson, LN. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistame in weeds. Weed Science. 44: 1 76-1 93. Kandasamy, M.K., Paolillo, D.J., Faraday, C.D., Nasrallah, J.B. and Nasrallah, M.E. 1989. The S-loais specific glycoproteins of Bmssb accumulate in the cell wall of developing digma papillae. Developmental Biology. 1 34:462472. Kanno, T. and Hinata, K. 1969. An eledron miaoscopic study of the barrier against pollen-tube growth in self-incompatible C~dhne. Plant and Cell Physiology. 101213-216, Keller, W.A., Rajhathy, Tm and Lacapra, J. 1975. In vitro production of plants from pollen in Brassika campestris. Canadian Joumal Genetics and Cytology. 171655666. Kidwell, K.K. and Osbom, T.C. 1992. Simple plant DNA isolation procedures. In: Beckmann. J.S. and Osbom, T.C. (eds.) Plant Genomes: Methods for Genetic and Physical Mapping, Wwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht p 1-1 3. Kidwell, K.K., Woodfield, D.R, Bingham, ET. and Osbom, T.C. 1994. Molecular marker diversity and yield of isogenic 2x and 4x singlecrosses of alfalfa. Crop Science. 34784788. Kimber, D.S. and McGregor, D.I. 1995. The species and their origin, wltivation and world production. In: Kimber, O.S. and McGregor, D. 1. (eds.) Brassica Oilseeds: Production and Utilization. CAB International, Cambridge. p 1-7. Kondra, Z.P., Campbell, D.C. and King, J.R 1983. Temperature effeds on germination of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. and Brassi- campesfris L.). Canadian Joumal of Plant Science. 63: 1063-1065. Kott, L.S. 1 995. H ybfld production systems based on self-incompatibility in oilseed Brassica. In: Proceedings of 9th International Rapeseed Congress. A27. Kott, LS., Polsoni, Lm and Beversdorf. W.D. 1988a. Cytological aspects of isolated microspore culture of Brassica napus. Canadian Journal of Botany. 66: 1658-1664. Kott, L.S., Polsoni, L., Ellis, B. and Beversdorf, W.D. 1988b. Autotoxicity in isolated microspore cultures of Brassica napus. Canadian Journal of Botany. 66: 1665-1 670.
Kott, L.S. and Bevemdorf, W.D. 1990. Enhancd plant regeneration from microsporederived embryos of Bm& napw by chilling. partial desiccaüon and age seledion. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 23:f 87-192. Landry, BSq Huka N., Etoh, Tm, Hamda, J.J. and Uncoln, S.E. 1991. A genetic map for Bra- napus based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms detected with expresseci DNA sequences. Genome. 34543-552. Leon, J. 1991. Heterosis and mixing Mects in wïnter oilseed rape. Crop Science. 31 ~281-284. Lichter, R 1982. Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica napus. Zeitshrift fit Pfianzenphysiol. 105:427434. Mackill, D. J. 1995. Classifying japonica tice cultivars with RAPD markers. Crop Science. 35889494. Mailer, RJ., Scarth, R and Fristensky, B. 1994. Discrimination among cultivars of rapeseed (Brassica napus L-) using DNA polymorphisms amplified from arbitrary primers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 87:697-704. Mathias, R and Robbefen, G. 1 991. Effective diploidization of microsporederived haploids of rape (Brassice napus L.) by in vitm colchicine treatment. Plant Breeding. 1 06:82-84. McNaughton, I.H. 1 976. Tumip and relatives: Brassica campesttts (CmSerae). In: Simrnonds, N.W. (ed.) Evolution of Crop Plants, Longman, New York p 45-48. Miranda-Filho, J.B. and Chaves, 1.J. 1991. Procedures for selecting composites based on prediction methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 81 :265-271. Morgante, M. and Olivieri, AM. 1993. PCRamplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. The Plant Journal. 3:175-182. Momson, RA and Evans, D.A. 1988. Haploid plants from tissue culture: new plant varieties in a shortened time frame. Biotedinology. 6:6û4-690. Mulitze, D. K. 1992. Agrobasel4: Reference manual. Version 1.2. Agronomix Software, Inc., Portage la Prairie, MB. Naqvi, N.I., Bonman, J.M.. Mackill, D.J., Nelson, RJ. and Chattoo, B.B. 1995. Identification of RAPD markers finked to a major Hast resistanœ gene in rice. Molecular Breeding. 1 :341-34A
Page 1 and 2:
The Application of Ooubled Haploid
Page 3 and 4:
COPYRIGET P1ERbIISSION PAGE A Thesu
Page 5 and 6:
111 application in 8. rapa cultivar
Page 7 and 8:
v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTWT ACKNOWLE
Page 9 and 10:
VI1 LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page EFI',
Page 11 and 12:
lx LlST OF FIGURES FIGURE Page Prod
Page 13 and 14:
1.2 performance. Production of DH p
Page 15 and 16:
History of Canola Produdion of Bras
Page 17 and 18:
Economic Importance and Distributio
Page 19 and 20:
2.5 genes involved in recognizhg an
Page 21 and 22:
2.7 There is potential for loss of
Page 23 and 24:
2.9 their stability under different
Page 25 and 26:
2.1 1 selected and selfed to create
Page 27 and 28:
2.1 3 production (Mathias and Wbbel
Page 29 and 30:
2.1 5 traits have low heritability.
Page 31 and 32:
2.17 opposite strands of template D
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2.3. The AFLP procedure usin
Page 35 and 36:
2.21 non-specifïc arüfacts which
Page 37 and 38:
2.23 maintenance of DNA extradion p
Page 39 and 40:
Cornparison of Bud Pollination and
Page 41 and 42:
INTRODUCTION Production of doubled
Page 43 and 44:
Effkiency lndex = total number of s
Page 46 and 47: Application of doubfeâ haploid dev
Page 48 and 49: Brassita rapa represents approximat
Page 50 and 51: 4.5 and a daylnight temperature of
Page 52 and 53: 4-7 plants within each tent using a
Page 54 and 55: 4.9 Days to Flowanng Reward OH Iine
Page 56 and 57: 4-11 In Canan, Reward Cja and Cl,,
Page 58 and 59: 4.13 counterparts. The extra genera
Page 60 and 61: 4-15 composite population can eithe
Page 62: Table 4.2. Mean parameter values fo
Page 68 and 69: Table 4.8. Correlation of days to f
Page 72 and 73: Detedion of Genetic Variation in Bm
Page 74: INTRODUCTION The production of doub
Page 77 and 78: 5-6 represented one sample from C,
Page 79 and 80: 5-8 the percent of polymorphism pre
Page 81 and 82: 5-10 and C, and a similar level of
Page 83 and 84: Table 5.2. Polymorphic levels in Cl
Page 86 and 87: 5-15 Table 5.5. Proportion of polyr
Page 88 and 89: 6. GENERAL DlSCUSSlON AND CONCLUSIO
Page 90 and 91: 6-3 B. rapa OH Iines. Seleded DH Ii
Page 92 and 93: Abramson, RD. 1995. Thermostable DN
Page 94 and 95: Diers, B.W. and Osbom, T.C. 1994. G
Page 98 and 99: Narasimhulu, SBw and Chopra, U.L. 1
Page 100 and 101: Schuler, T.J., Hutcheson, O.S. and
Page 102 and 103: Williams, J.G.K., HanMey, M.K., Raf
Page 104 and 105: Appendix 12. Data matrix of RAPO pr
Page 106 and 107: Apperidi 1. (-nueû) Month D~Y Temp
Page 108 and 109: Mean Max [mm)
Page 110 and 111: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
Page 112: Append'bc 4. FM measummmts fw param
Page 116 and 117: Locaüon Plant Id. RedTcate €MG D
Page 118 and 119: C24 C24 C2-4 C2-8 C2-8 C2-8 C2-8 c2
Page 120 and 121: Location Plant Id. Replicate €MG
Page 122 and 123: Locaüori Plant ld. Replicate EMG O
Page 124 and 125: Appendix 10. The mean performance o
Page 127: f i . I 1 t a I 1 I I t t c i r' !m
Page 130 and 131: Appendii 12. Data matrix of RAPO pm
Page 133: Appendix 13. @mtïnued) Primer Comp
Page 138: Appendk 14. (continuedl Primer Comp
show all

The Application of Ooubled Haploid Plants to Population ... - MSpace

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?