ENTER.HUB_Baseline study PDF, 6 Mo - Urbact

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EUROPEAN UNION European Regional Development Fund EXAMPLE Matrix of Themes for URBACT Local Support Group members Ciudad Real LOCAL SUPPORT GROUP MEMBERS THEME IMPEFE CR CIUDADES AVE Instituto Municipal de Promoción Económica, Formación y Empleo City of Ciudad Real Local AVE Cities Network Coordinator in Ciudad Real ESTACIÓN AVE Coordinator Railway Station Ciudad Real UNIVERSIDAD Universidad de Castilla – La Mancha 1 Synergy between hub and city Tutor Tutor Tutor Tutor Tutor 2 Synergy between hub and hinterland Followers Followers Followers 3 Urban and environmental insertion Followers Followers Followers 4 Tourism and culture Leader Leader Leader 5 Communication/Paricipation/Governance Followers Followers Followers Followers 6 Creation of networks (among HUB cities) Followers Followers Followers Followers Followers 7 New planning tools and tool kits Followers Followers Followers Followers 8 Railway - railway networking Followers Followers Followers Followers 9 Railway – road networking Followers Followers Followers 10 Economy impact Followers Followers Followers ENTER.HUB Baseline study 2012.10.31
EUROPEAN UNION European Regional Development Fund ENTER.HUB Excerpt from the original proposal for the development phase, March 15th 2012 Note ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES based on discussions during the site visits, is now a horizontal theme and numbered as 10, ao all the themes in this list changed their number, from 3 onwards! NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION METHOD: As starting point, the project will consider a first list of “themes of analysis /“indicators / domains able to increase the socio-economic potentialities of middle-sized cities having an intermodal junction of regional relevance (i.e. a HS station). These themes have been defined considering needs and potentials of existing hubs, and emerged from the analysis and comparison of the partners and other study cases. These indicators will represent a “basic grid of analysis”, allowing confrontation between cities and performance comparisons. Note that it is conceived as an “open list” for the whole duration of the project, to be agreed and jointly modified /extended while progressing with the project implementation: this because the exchange of experience and the project development will surely bring new suggestions and contents to these themes (see table below) These 10 different themes allow comparing relevant aspects of the effectiveness and full exploitation of all potentials stemming from the hosting of a EU/regional HUB. The different positioning of each partner, with respect to different aspects, will allow supporting each reality in the upgrading process and full exploitation of possible potentials. The mapping and analysis of the existing practices and ideas according to these 10 themes will allow each partner to conceive local planning tools output (e.g., tender competition for ideas, planning tools formulated and to be applied on the extended area / catchment of reference ). These 10 themes are to be considered possible fields to activate full potential exploitation. ENTER.HUB Baseline study 2012.10.31 73
Page 1 and 2:
EUROPEAN UNION European Regional De
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22: EUROPEAN UNION European Regional De
Page 27 and 28: One good example: Euralille good ex
Page 55 and 56: €/capita EUROPEAN UNION European
Page 61 and 62: Creil Agglo Ulm Gdynia EUROPEAN UNI
Page 63 and 64: Łódź Lugano EUROPEAN UNION Europ
Page 65 and 66: Preston Rostock EUROPEAN UNION Euro
Page 71: REGGIO EMILIA CIUDAD REAL CREIL ULM
show all

ENTER.HUB_Baseline study PDF, 6 Mo - Urbact

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?