30.12.2013 Views

Projects - Cengage Learning

Projects - Cengage Learning

Projects - Cengage Learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C C-13<br />

(a) The two data points in the previous figure show world wind-energy generating<br />

capacity for the years 1985 and 1998. What is the slope of the line<br />

joining the two points? What are the units for the slope?<br />

(b) Find the equation of the line joining the two given points. Write the answer<br />

in the form y mt b.<br />

(c) Use the result in part (b) to estimate the years in which world wind-energy<br />

generating capacity was between 3000 megawatts and 7500 megawatts<br />

(inclusive). Hint: You need to solve the inequality 3000 y 7500;<br />

round the answers to the nearest integers.<br />

(d) Your estimates in part (c) are based on the assumption that world<br />

wind-energy generating capacity increased in a straight-line fashion from<br />

1985 to 1998. By using techniques from statistics (and more detailed<br />

data), it can be shown that a more accurate summary of world wind-energy<br />

generating capacity over these years is given by the equation<br />

(e)<br />

(f)<br />

y 6.977t 3 64.786t 2 325.4t 1012<br />

where again, t 0 corresponds to 1985. Using this expression for y, estimate<br />

the years in which world wind-energy generating capacity was between<br />

3000 megawatts and 7500 megawatts (inclusive). (Round the key<br />

numbers to the nearest integers.) Compare your results to those in part (c).<br />

Although increasing rapidly, wind-energy generation is currently but a<br />

small portion of the world energy picture. For instance, whereas world<br />

wind-energy generating capacity in 1998 was 9600 megawatts, the corresponding<br />

figure for nuclear energy in 1998 was 343,000 megawatts. When<br />

might wind-energy reach this level? Use the equation in part (d) to obtain<br />

one possible answer to this question. Round your answer to the nearest five<br />

years. Hint: In an appropriate viewing rectangle, you want to look for<br />

the point where the curve y 6.977t 3 64.786t 2 325.4t 1012 meets<br />

the horizontal line y 343,000.<br />

Rework part (e), but instead of using the cubic equation from part (d),<br />

use the straight-line equation obtained in part (b). Compare the results;<br />

which scenario do you think is more realistic?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!