Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10 COAL AND TIMBER January, 1905<br />
serious results so far as the writer knows,<br />
in the several Bituminous Inspection Districts.<br />
I will cite a case that came under<br />
the writer's personal observation, where<br />
the loader, as soon as the machine had<br />
finished undercutting his room and had<br />
been moved to the next room, he, the<br />
loader, got down on his knees on the road<br />
side, scraped away some of the dust from<br />
face of undercut to look in under to see<br />
if r.he machine had left in any stumps or<br />
unc.it coal and with his open light attached<br />
to his cap on his head, looked in under with<br />
the result that the finer particles of dust<br />
set a flame, burning him severely. This<br />
occurred about 11 o'clock A. M. and there<br />
was no gas in the room. If there had<br />
been, the driver, operator and helper, as<br />
well as the loader, would have found it<br />
sooner as they all four were using open<br />
lights and upon examination of the Fire<br />
Boss' reports, no gas had ever been reported,<br />
so that it is evident in the writer's<br />
opinion, that the fine particles of coal dust<br />
set aflame by coming in contact with the<br />
open light as used by the said loader, Fire<br />
Damp being absent. In questioning the said<br />
loader, his version was that it went off like<br />
a flash of blasting powder.<br />
Now, if you will permit me to digress<br />
a few moments and take a view of the reports<br />
of some of the British Mine Inspectors<br />
for recent years, also of our own<br />
Bituminous Inspectors' reports, as in the<br />
writer's opinion this paper would be incomplete<br />
without them, as they bear so<br />
closely to the subject under consideration<br />
and attention should be drawn to some of<br />
them as they contain several references to<br />
the part played by coal dust in some recent<br />
explosions. April 30th, 1875, an explosion<br />
occurred at the Bunkers Hill Colliery,<br />
wdiere 49 men lost their lives, caused by a<br />
blown out shot igniting the coal dust which<br />
in turn communicated with a pocket of gas<br />
supposed to be back some distance from<br />
the face, as the working face was considered<br />
safe for to fire the shot, this heading or<br />
entry, being ventilated by a pipe one foot<br />
in diameter.<br />
Brannpith Colliery, Durham, April 24th,<br />
1889, explosion caused by an open torch,<br />
used by workmen in cleaning out hoppers,<br />
in which three men lost their lives.<br />
Mossneld Colliery, October 16th, 1889,<br />
on which the Inspector says this disaster<br />
is another example of how an explosion<br />
is extended by coal dust. The loss of life<br />
and property being greatly increased as a<br />
consequence.<br />
Hubburn Colliery, November 4th, 1889,<br />
in which the inspector says he does not<br />
feel justified in calling it entirely an explosion<br />
of Fire Damp, as the shot hole was<br />
charged with gelignite and roburite together<br />
and in the inspector's opinion this<br />
explosion was caused by the flame blown<br />
out from the fast shot, assisted by any<br />
small quantity of Fire Damp that may be<br />
present.<br />
Particulars of another example of Coal<br />
Dust exploding without Fire Damp which<br />
occured in 1890 at one of the Collieries<br />
in the Yorkshire District. Some very<br />
fine coal dust had accumulated on a plank<br />
which it was necessary to remove to make<br />
some repairs to the engine; in turning the<br />
plank over, the coal dust fell upon a torch<br />
light below and an explosion occurred,<br />
burning several men severely. Also recent<br />
reports of the Inspectors in the different<br />
States have drawn attention to the serious<br />
effect coal dust has in propagating an explosion.<br />
The Inspector for the Second<br />
Bituminous District in his report for 1891<br />
recommended that coal dust of dry mines<br />
be dampened; also the report of the several<br />
Inspectors on the late Harwick disaster<br />
says they agree that the cause of the explosion<br />
was the result of a blown out shot,<br />
and that the sprinkling and the laying of<br />
the coal dust according to rule 60 had been<br />
neglected. Also, they found that in several<br />
parts of the mine the heat had been<br />
intense, coking the coal and dust. And,<br />
further, the report says we can readily see<br />
that the explosion could be transmitted<br />
from one point to another by the Carbonic<br />
Oxide distilled from the coal dust which<br />
had been suspended in the atmosphere of<br />
the mines, thus exploding the accumulation<br />
of Fire Damp and coal dust along the path<br />
of the explosion, carrying death and destruction<br />
into every nook and corner of<br />
the mine. In viewing over the different<br />
causes of explosions, on the one hand I<br />
find that the largest and most destructive<br />
explosions have occurred in mines whicli<br />
are more or less fiery, and on the other<br />
hand, no very large explosions have ever<br />
occurred in a very wet mine, which tends<br />
to show that coal dust plays some important<br />
part in the extent of an explosion.<br />
From experiments made by Mr.W. Galloway<br />
(whose name will always be honorably<br />
associated with this matter) proves<br />
beyond a doubt that the existence of Fire<br />
coal dust in fiery mines is a dangerous<br />
element and that it has played an important<br />
part in Mine explosions. It has been<br />
stated that if a small' quantity of Fire<br />
Damp be present and fired that its effects<br />
are much intensified and the explosion is<br />
extended along the roads containing coal<br />
dust, thus feeding the flames of the explosion<br />
and that these facts are now fully<br />
recognized is evident as per rule No. 60 of<br />
the Bituminous Mine Law which reads :<br />
'• In mines where coal dust has accumulated<br />
to a dangerous extent, care shall be<br />
exercised to prevent said coal dust from<br />
floating in the atmosphere by sprinkling it<br />
with water or otherwise as far as practical.<br />
It is now very evident that a blown out shot<br />
will raise the dust and set it aflame and for<br />
evidence in this will cite a case when Mr.<br />
H. Hall, Inspector of Mines for the Liverpool<br />
District, reported by him to the Secretary<br />
of State, January 23rd, 1893, says in<br />
part that a charge of blasting powder was<br />
fired by electricity from a cannon, suspended<br />
in a wet shaft, the air of which was<br />
proved by careful chemical analysis to be<br />
absolutely free from any trace of inflammable<br />
gas, and in some of the experiments,<br />
even in the absence of dry dust in suspension<br />
in the shaft, that the dust lodged on<br />
the timbers was exploded by firing V/2 lbs.<br />
of gunpowder from the cannon. Mr. Galloway<br />
says that one per cent, of Fire Damp<br />
when properly mixed with very fine coal<br />
dust and air forms an explosive mixture,<br />
while Sir Frederick Able states that from<br />
2 to 2.'^ per cent, of Fire Damp is needed.<br />
In the writer's opinion, after glancing over<br />
the several reports of Mine Inspectors and<br />
in viewing over the results of experiments<br />
made in the past, the following conclusion<br />
may be drawn : First—Coal Dust is<br />
not completely burned in flaming air.<br />
Second—And that if a high charge of coal<br />
dust is inflamed at one point, the carbonic<br />
oxide produced becomes a transmitter of<br />
flame to another point. Third—And that<br />
in case we need to use a very strong current<br />
of air for the removable of gas, this<br />
strong current would raise the dust lodging<br />
on the timbers or along the floors or<br />
sides of airways and carry it in suspension<br />
and whiie the gas being removed may of<br />
itself not be sufficient when mixed with air<br />
to make an explosive mixture, yet with the<br />
addition of coal dust a very explosive mixture<br />
may be generated and if any kind of<br />
flame came in contact with said mixture a<br />
very disastrous explosion would occur.<br />
The question naturally arises, what means<br />
or methods should be applied to remove<br />
this agent of destruction from our midst?<br />
Some have proposed covering the roads<br />
with common salt believing that it would<br />
retain a continual dampness being delignescent<br />
or an absorber of water. Nitrate<br />
of Soda has been proposed and tried for<br />
the same purpose, wetting the roads with<br />
streams of water has been tried, but from<br />
some cause or other these methods have<br />
either entirely failed or partially so. In the<br />
writer's opinion, the coal dust should be<br />
loaded and taken out of the mine as far<br />
as practical, yet in doing this the dust in<br />
transit along the haulage roads in the<br />
mine wagons would leak out through the<br />
crevices of said wagons on the road as in<br />
our improved systems of transporting the<br />
coal from the face to tipple, the trains are<br />
run at a great speed and the dry coal and<br />
coal dust carried in the wagons is subject<br />
more or less to jolting and jarring and the<br />
dust leaking out gradually settles on<br />
some part of the haulage, the finer particles<br />
remaining longer in suspension settling<br />
for the most part on the timbers and sides,<br />
and if an explosion should occur in any<br />
one district of the mine and the dust deposited<br />
on haulage or other districts may<br />
not be set aflame, yet the dust will be much<br />
more violently agitated and the atmosphere<br />
become so impregnated with the dust, as to<br />
render it fatal to any one inhaling it while<br />
trying to escape from the mine, not having<br />
been affected by the said explosion in the<br />
other district. To keep the haulage ways<br />
as free as practical from this danger a water<br />
wagon attached to the rear end of trips<br />
going in or out of mine, preferably behind