30.12.2013 Views

s - Clpdigital.org

s - Clpdigital.org

s - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 COAL AND TIMBER January, 1905<br />

serious results so far as the writer knows,<br />

in the several Bituminous Inspection Districts.<br />

I will cite a case that came under<br />

the writer's personal observation, where<br />

the loader, as soon as the machine had<br />

finished undercutting his room and had<br />

been moved to the next room, he, the<br />

loader, got down on his knees on the road<br />

side, scraped away some of the dust from<br />

face of undercut to look in under to see<br />

if r.he machine had left in any stumps or<br />

unc.it coal and with his open light attached<br />

to his cap on his head, looked in under with<br />

the result that the finer particles of dust<br />

set a flame, burning him severely. This<br />

occurred about 11 o'clock A. M. and there<br />

was no gas in the room. If there had<br />

been, the driver, operator and helper, as<br />

well as the loader, would have found it<br />

sooner as they all four were using open<br />

lights and upon examination of the Fire<br />

Boss' reports, no gas had ever been reported,<br />

so that it is evident in the writer's<br />

opinion, that the fine particles of coal dust<br />

set aflame by coming in contact with the<br />

open light as used by the said loader, Fire<br />

Damp being absent. In questioning the said<br />

loader, his version was that it went off like<br />

a flash of blasting powder.<br />

Now, if you will permit me to digress<br />

a few moments and take a view of the reports<br />

of some of the British Mine Inspectors<br />

for recent years, also of our own<br />

Bituminous Inspectors' reports, as in the<br />

writer's opinion this paper would be incomplete<br />

without them, as they bear so<br />

closely to the subject under consideration<br />

and attention should be drawn to some of<br />

them as they contain several references to<br />

the part played by coal dust in some recent<br />

explosions. April 30th, 1875, an explosion<br />

occurred at the Bunkers Hill Colliery,<br />

wdiere 49 men lost their lives, caused by a<br />

blown out shot igniting the coal dust which<br />

in turn communicated with a pocket of gas<br />

supposed to be back some distance from<br />

the face, as the working face was considered<br />

safe for to fire the shot, this heading or<br />

entry, being ventilated by a pipe one foot<br />

in diameter.<br />

Brannpith Colliery, Durham, April 24th,<br />

1889, explosion caused by an open torch,<br />

used by workmen in cleaning out hoppers,<br />

in which three men lost their lives.<br />

Mossneld Colliery, October 16th, 1889,<br />

on which the Inspector says this disaster<br />

is another example of how an explosion<br />

is extended by coal dust. The loss of life<br />

and property being greatly increased as a<br />

consequence.<br />

Hubburn Colliery, November 4th, 1889,<br />

in which the inspector says he does not<br />

feel justified in calling it entirely an explosion<br />

of Fire Damp, as the shot hole was<br />

charged with gelignite and roburite together<br />

and in the inspector's opinion this<br />

explosion was caused by the flame blown<br />

out from the fast shot, assisted by any<br />

small quantity of Fire Damp that may be<br />

present.<br />

Particulars of another example of Coal<br />

Dust exploding without Fire Damp which<br />

occured in 1890 at one of the Collieries<br />

in the Yorkshire District. Some very<br />

fine coal dust had accumulated on a plank<br />

which it was necessary to remove to make<br />

some repairs to the engine; in turning the<br />

plank over, the coal dust fell upon a torch<br />

light below and an explosion occurred,<br />

burning several men severely. Also recent<br />

reports of the Inspectors in the different<br />

States have drawn attention to the serious<br />

effect coal dust has in propagating an explosion.<br />

The Inspector for the Second<br />

Bituminous District in his report for 1891<br />

recommended that coal dust of dry mines<br />

be dampened; also the report of the several<br />

Inspectors on the late Harwick disaster<br />

says they agree that the cause of the explosion<br />

was the result of a blown out shot,<br />

and that the sprinkling and the laying of<br />

the coal dust according to rule 60 had been<br />

neglected. Also, they found that in several<br />

parts of the mine the heat had been<br />

intense, coking the coal and dust. And,<br />

further, the report says we can readily see<br />

that the explosion could be transmitted<br />

from one point to another by the Carbonic<br />

Oxide distilled from the coal dust which<br />

had been suspended in the atmosphere of<br />

the mines, thus exploding the accumulation<br />

of Fire Damp and coal dust along the path<br />

of the explosion, carrying death and destruction<br />

into every nook and corner of<br />

the mine. In viewing over the different<br />

causes of explosions, on the one hand I<br />

find that the largest and most destructive<br />

explosions have occurred in mines whicli<br />

are more or less fiery, and on the other<br />

hand, no very large explosions have ever<br />

occurred in a very wet mine, which tends<br />

to show that coal dust plays some important<br />

part in the extent of an explosion.<br />

From experiments made by Mr.W. Galloway<br />

(whose name will always be honorably<br />

associated with this matter) proves<br />

beyond a doubt that the existence of Fire<br />

coal dust in fiery mines is a dangerous<br />

element and that it has played an important<br />

part in Mine explosions. It has been<br />

stated that if a small' quantity of Fire<br />

Damp be present and fired that its effects<br />

are much intensified and the explosion is<br />

extended along the roads containing coal<br />

dust, thus feeding the flames of the explosion<br />

and that these facts are now fully<br />

recognized is evident as per rule No. 60 of<br />

the Bituminous Mine Law which reads :<br />

'• In mines where coal dust has accumulated<br />

to a dangerous extent, care shall be<br />

exercised to prevent said coal dust from<br />

floating in the atmosphere by sprinkling it<br />

with water or otherwise as far as practical.<br />

It is now very evident that a blown out shot<br />

will raise the dust and set it aflame and for<br />

evidence in this will cite a case when Mr.<br />

H. Hall, Inspector of Mines for the Liverpool<br />

District, reported by him to the Secretary<br />

of State, January 23rd, 1893, says in<br />

part that a charge of blasting powder was<br />

fired by electricity from a cannon, suspended<br />

in a wet shaft, the air of which was<br />

proved by careful chemical analysis to be<br />

absolutely free from any trace of inflammable<br />

gas, and in some of the experiments,<br />

even in the absence of dry dust in suspension<br />

in the shaft, that the dust lodged on<br />

the timbers was exploded by firing V/2 lbs.<br />

of gunpowder from the cannon. Mr. Galloway<br />

says that one per cent, of Fire Damp<br />

when properly mixed with very fine coal<br />

dust and air forms an explosive mixture,<br />

while Sir Frederick Able states that from<br />

2 to 2.'^ per cent, of Fire Damp is needed.<br />

In the writer's opinion, after glancing over<br />

the several reports of Mine Inspectors and<br />

in viewing over the results of experiments<br />

made in the past, the following conclusion<br />

may be drawn : First—Coal Dust is<br />

not completely burned in flaming air.<br />

Second—And that if a high charge of coal<br />

dust is inflamed at one point, the carbonic<br />

oxide produced becomes a transmitter of<br />

flame to another point. Third—And that<br />

in case we need to use a very strong current<br />

of air for the removable of gas, this<br />

strong current would raise the dust lodging<br />

on the timbers or along the floors or<br />

sides of airways and carry it in suspension<br />

and whiie the gas being removed may of<br />

itself not be sufficient when mixed with air<br />

to make an explosive mixture, yet with the<br />

addition of coal dust a very explosive mixture<br />

may be generated and if any kind of<br />

flame came in contact with said mixture a<br />

very disastrous explosion would occur.<br />

The question naturally arises, what means<br />

or methods should be applied to remove<br />

this agent of destruction from our midst?<br />

Some have proposed covering the roads<br />

with common salt believing that it would<br />

retain a continual dampness being delignescent<br />

or an absorber of water. Nitrate<br />

of Soda has been proposed and tried for<br />

the same purpose, wetting the roads with<br />

streams of water has been tried, but from<br />

some cause or other these methods have<br />

either entirely failed or partially so. In the<br />

writer's opinion, the coal dust should be<br />

loaded and taken out of the mine as far<br />

as practical, yet in doing this the dust in<br />

transit along the haulage roads in the<br />

mine wagons would leak out through the<br />

crevices of said wagons on the road as in<br />

our improved systems of transporting the<br />

coal from the face to tipple, the trains are<br />

run at a great speed and the dry coal and<br />

coal dust carried in the wagons is subject<br />

more or less to jolting and jarring and the<br />

dust leaking out gradually settles on<br />

some part of the haulage, the finer particles<br />

remaining longer in suspension settling<br />

for the most part on the timbers and sides,<br />

and if an explosion should occur in any<br />

one district of the mine and the dust deposited<br />

on haulage or other districts may<br />

not be set aflame, yet the dust will be much<br />

more violently agitated and the atmosphere<br />

become so impregnated with the dust, as to<br />

render it fatal to any one inhaling it while<br />

trying to escape from the mine, not having<br />

been affected by the said explosion in the<br />

other district. To keep the haulage ways<br />

as free as practical from this danger a water<br />

wagon attached to the rear end of trips<br />

going in or out of mine, preferably behind

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!