st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
"<br />
Come<br />
"<br />
"<br />
SERMONS. I I<br />
7<br />
"<br />
then, brethren," he concludes, as many<br />
as received the name <strong>of</strong> believers, who have been<br />
. . .<br />
counted worthy to be called the people <strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong>, let<br />
us not make our calling void, nor defile our faith by<br />
unseemly deeds. Tis not enough to be called a<br />
believer ;<br />
let us manife<strong>st</strong> our faith by works<br />
Let us remember the renunciation and the covenant<br />
which we made in baptism. We renounced the devil<br />
and his angels, and all his service. Let us keep our<br />
renouncing<br />
let us not return ;<br />
again like the dog to his<br />
vomit." He then enumerates the works <strong>of</strong> the devil,<br />
which they should renounce ;<br />
and the graces <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Spirit, which they should follow (c. vi); ending with the<br />
"<br />
prayer Hold thou the dominion over my heart, O<br />
:<br />
Lord, and keep<br />
it as Thine inheritance. Make Thou<br />
Thy dwelling in me, along with the Father and the<br />
Holy Gho<strong>st</strong>. Widen in me the cords <strong>of</strong> Thy taber<br />
nacle, even the operations <strong>of</strong> Thy mo<strong>st</strong> holy Spirit.<br />
F^or Thou art my God, and I will praise Thee, together<br />
with Thy Eternal Father and Thy quickening Spirit,<br />
now, henceforth, and for ever.<br />
Amen."<br />
The third sermon is on Good Friday Sanda<br />
Parasceve, the day <strong>of</strong> preparation for the Jewish<br />
Sabbath. In some manuscripts<br />
it is attributed to<br />
St. John Chryso<strong>st</strong>om, and was included in the works<br />
<strong>of</strong> that writer by Sir Henry Savile. Lequien seems<br />
to think it<br />
genuine, by asserting that it is wrongly<br />
ascribed to Chryso<strong>st</strong>om, and by introducing<br />
it in his<br />
own edition <strong>of</strong> Damascenus s works without further<br />
remark. I am bound to say that the <strong>st</strong>yle appears to<br />
me to show a higher order <strong>of</strong> eloquence than is found