st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
"<br />
126 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />
to be believed on and worshipped by every creature ;<br />
(c. xxi.).<br />
A figure <strong>of</strong> the cross is found, somewhat artifi<br />
cially, in the act <strong>of</strong> Moses, when bidden to //// up<br />
his rod and <strong>st</strong>retch out his hand over the sea; the<br />
uplifted rod, as it would seem, being meant for a<br />
type <strong>of</strong> the upright beam <strong>of</strong> the cross, and the out<br />
<strong>st</strong>retched arm for the transverse beam across it. 1<br />
The reason why Chri<strong>st</strong> should have been laid in a<br />
new sepulchre<br />
is thus <strong>st</strong>ated : But why He is laid<br />
in a new sepulchre, wherein no dead was ever yet<br />
laid? Methinks it was that the resurrection might<br />
not be supposed to have been that <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> its<br />
former occupants. For the men who thus looked<br />
with evil eye on their own salvation were ready for<br />
any device, and mo<strong>st</strong> prompt to disbelieve. And,<br />
therefore, that the resurrection <strong>of</strong> the Lord may<br />
be visibly and conspicuously displayed, He is buried<br />
in a new and unused tomb. He, the spiritual Rock<br />
<strong>of</strong> life, from which as it followed them the unmindful<br />
Israelites drank ; He, the corner <strong>st</strong>one, not hewn with<br />
This seems the true explanation <strong>of</strong> an obscure passage.<br />
Damascene s words are: "Does not the same Moses again<br />
smite the sea with his rod, and by the tw<strong>of</strong>old manner <strong>of</strong> his<br />
<strong>st</strong>roke, the upright and the transverse, betoken the figure <strong>of</strong><br />
the cross?" (c. xxv.) Lequien briefly refers to Exod. xiv. 27;<br />
but in that verse there is mention only <strong>of</strong> the <strong>st</strong>retching out <strong>of</strong><br />
the hand over the sea. To complete the fanciful idea in the<br />
text, we want the mention <strong>of</strong> the uplifted rod as well, found in<br />
xiv. 1 6 ;<br />
unless indeed there has been some confusion in the<br />
writer s mind between this and the smiting the rock twice ;<br />
as<br />
there is nothing in Exod. xiv. to sugge<strong>st</strong> that Moses smote the<br />
sea.