26.01.2014 Views

Temple and Contemplation brings together for the first ... - ImagoMundi

Temple and Contemplation brings together for the first ... - ImagoMundi

Temple and Contemplation brings together for the first ... - ImagoMundi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE IMAGO TEMPLI IN CONFRONTATION<br />

<strong>the</strong> idea that <strong>the</strong> eschatological Israel will be "like God". In a Qumran<br />

document which has already been <strong>the</strong> subject of lengthy research, Melchizedek,<br />

a priestly, messianic <strong>and</strong> eschatological figure, is designated as<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> Elohim. 66 His precursor Abraham was <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> "righteous<br />

plant". All <strong>the</strong> righteous planted after him by God, from age to age, are<br />

chosen from among <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> Jews <strong>and</strong> Gentiles, with <strong>the</strong> result that<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> plant of justice is indissolubly linked to <strong>the</strong> idea of divine<br />

election. By <strong>the</strong> same token, it appears to be inseparable from <strong>the</strong> idea of a<br />

gnosis <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> divine plan in hierohistory.<br />

The plant of justice receives nourishment, in fact, from <strong>the</strong> Water that is<br />

knowledge, <strong>and</strong> this knowledge is <strong>the</strong> gnosis that unveils <strong>the</strong> secret of <strong>the</strong><br />

divine mystery to <strong>the</strong> righteous who are called upon to inaugurate <strong>the</strong> new<br />

era. Thus <strong>the</strong> rise of <strong>the</strong>se "plants of justice" is, if not <strong>the</strong> most important<br />

event, certainly one of <strong>the</strong> most important in <strong>the</strong> divine plan of hierohistory,<br />

whose secret meaning is registered on <strong>the</strong> "celestial tablets" so frequently<br />

mentioned (I Enoch, The Book of Jubilees, Testaments of <strong>the</strong> Twelve Patriarchs), 67<br />

<strong>and</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Angels reveal only gradually to certain privileged men. We<br />

may say that <strong>the</strong>se "Tablets" are <strong>the</strong> "code of <strong>the</strong>ocracy in History", 68 but<br />

only if we specify that, as <strong>the</strong> setting of <strong>the</strong>ocratic activity, History means<br />

something o<strong>the</strong>r than what is understood by <strong>the</strong> word as it is currently<br />

employed. This is why we said earlier that we would ra<strong>the</strong>r use <strong>the</strong> term<br />

hierohistory, in order to avoid all ambiguity. For <strong>the</strong> same reason, it is not<br />

enough to say that History has two dimensions—one vertical <strong>and</strong> one<br />

horizontal—in <strong>the</strong> sense that it must be interpreted not merely in terms of<br />

a "final end" (eschaton) but also in terms of an "up above". Precisely here<br />

one must specify that a vision of History which acknowledges that <strong>the</strong><br />

events that constitute it possess a celestial archetype, confers on this<br />

History a parabolic dimension, a dimension which elevates all events to <strong>the</strong><br />

level of parables. Eschatology cannot simply be an event which one fine<br />

day puts an end to <strong>the</strong> rectilinear perspective of secular history. Equally,<br />

66 The eschatological Israel that is "like God" involves <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of imitatio Dei; cf.<br />

ibid., p. 141 note 1. Here we may remember <strong>the</strong> sentence which recurs frequently in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Islamic mystics: takhallaqu bi-akhlaq Allah, "model your ways on <strong>the</strong> divine<br />

ways". The Qumran fragment about Melchizedek (p. 140 note 3) has already been<br />

<strong>the</strong> subject of a considerable literature. We will return to it elsewhere in connection<br />

with its implications <strong>for</strong> Ismaili Imamology.<br />

67 Cf. Hans Bietenhard, Die himmlische Welt im Urchristentum und Sadtjudentum (Tubingen,<br />

1951), pp. 231-254: 'Die himmlischen Bucher und Tafeln'.<br />

68 Shozo Fujita, <strong>Temple</strong> Theology, pp. 142 ff.<br />

296<br />

THE IMAGO TEMPLI IN CONFRONTATION<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter is incapable of grasping <strong>the</strong> eschatological dimension. What it<br />

offers is a caricature: a social messianism or popularized eschatology. We<br />

will have occasion to recall, when speaking of Qumran, <strong>the</strong> connection<br />

between realized eschatology <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mysterium liturgicum, between <strong>the</strong><br />

existential meaning of eschatology <strong>and</strong> liturgical time.<br />

Only when <strong>the</strong>re is such a connection does <strong>the</strong> Imago of <strong>the</strong> final <strong>Temple</strong><br />

acquire its au<strong>the</strong>ntic <strong>and</strong> existential significance, as <strong>the</strong> eternal <strong>the</strong>ocratic<br />

kingdom. The final <strong>Temple</strong>, built in <strong>the</strong> middle of "<strong>the</strong> eternal planting of<br />

justice", will be <strong>the</strong> centre of <strong>the</strong> new world, where only <strong>the</strong> unique divine<br />

sovereignty will be recognized. The syn<strong>the</strong>sis of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> "planting<br />

of justice" <strong>and</strong> that of <strong>the</strong> restoration of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong>—that is to say, <strong>the</strong><br />

new <strong>Temple</strong> as God's planting, in which <strong>the</strong> "plant of justice" flowers<br />

eternally—establishes an Imago of <strong>the</strong> new world centred on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong>,<br />

an Imago Templi which is faithful to <strong>the</strong> vision of Ezekiel. By means of this<br />

symbolism, <strong>the</strong> pact or alliance between God <strong>and</strong> men takes <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong>—a <strong>for</strong>m which we, <strong>for</strong> our part, will certainly not define as<br />

empirical, since it is a <strong>for</strong>m which is par excellence <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong>'s imaginal<br />

<strong>for</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e experienced on <strong>the</strong> imaginal level, at "<strong>the</strong> meetingplace<br />

of <strong>the</strong> two seas". Thus, <strong>the</strong> Image of <strong>the</strong> future <strong>Temple</strong> {I Enoch <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Book of Jubilees) is inseparable from <strong>the</strong> restoration of <strong>the</strong> primordial<br />

Paradise. This fact is <strong>the</strong> root of all that is said below concerning <strong>the</strong><br />

symbolism of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology at Qumran. 69<br />

4. The celestial <strong>Temple</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cosmic restoration. In this way we re-encounter<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me which marks <strong>the</strong> climax of Ezekiel's templar <strong>the</strong>ology, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>me in which "<strong>the</strong> cosmic restoration <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Temple</strong>" are associated.<br />

The start of our inquiry here is a Jewish tradition according to which <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Temple</strong> is destined to be "in Heaven" until <strong>the</strong> end of days. 70 What is this<br />

celestial <strong>Temple</strong>? The reply to this question embraces three phases: a. <strong>the</strong><br />

celestial liturgy; b. <strong>the</strong> celestial Imago Templi; c. <strong>the</strong> link between <strong>the</strong><br />

celestial <strong>Temple</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> eschatological <strong>Temple</strong>.<br />

a. The Testament of Levi (3:4) contains an account of <strong>the</strong> vision that he<br />

69 Ibid., pp. 148, 150—151.<br />

70 O<strong>the</strong>r traditions situate <strong>the</strong> celestial temple "between heaven <strong>and</strong> earth"; ibid., p.<br />

152, note 1. (Cf. what is signified here by "<strong>the</strong> meeting-place of <strong>the</strong> two seas"). On<br />

<strong>the</strong> celestial temple, cf. I Enoch 61:12.<br />

297

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!