- Page 1 and 2: THE FIVE FACTORS OF PERSONALITY AND
- Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincere thanks
- Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACT This study utilized the co
- Page 7 and 8: CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION According to
- Page 9 and 10: particular interaction episode" (p
- Page 11 and 12: proximal context, which in turn aff
- Page 13 and 14: contextual model should examine the
- Page 15: Hypotheses The following hypotheses
- Page 19 and 20: experience and interpersonal intera
- Page 21 and 22: stability, and (e) culture McCrae a
- Page 23 and 24: samples of aduhs and children They
- Page 25 and 26: personality descriptors. In the sec
- Page 27 and 28: the five factors were identified in
- Page 29 and 30: When creating a new scale, it is ne
- Page 31 and 32: item adjective list. McCrae and Cos
- Page 33 and 34: was .72 and the largest divergent c
- Page 35 and 36: Another study conducted by McCrae a
- Page 37 and 38: as measured by the PRF, can be view
- Page 39 and 40: Longitudinal studies provide insigh
- Page 41 and 42: The major weakness of this line of
- Page 43 and 44: interactions, men report higher inh
- Page 45 and 46: more likely to avoid initiation int
- Page 47 and 48: concluded that individuals high in
- Page 49 and 50: type of self-disclosure was also as
- Page 51 and 52: Emotional Support Emotional support
- Page 53 and 54: likely to be desired if they have t
- Page 55 and 56: self-esteem, self-confidence, inter
- Page 57 and 58: colored by other information about
- Page 59 and 60: confederates, but more negative soc
- Page 61 and 62: esults cannot be generalized to opp
- Page 63 and 64: Lloyd (1990) contacted the same cou
- Page 65 and 66: poshively related to discussing and
- Page 67 and 68:
contrast, unstable couples were cha
- Page 69 and 70:
Personality and Interpersonal Compe
- Page 71 and 72:
partner's personaHty (e.g., extrave
- Page 73 and 74:
negatively associated whh prosocial
- Page 75 and 76:
ated by peers on assertiveness and
- Page 77 and 78:
These results support the premise t
- Page 79 and 80:
maintenance O'Brien and DeLongis (1
- Page 81 and 82:
satisfaction, distal factors (persp
- Page 83 and 84:
marriage and then annually for thre
- Page 85 and 86:
study indicated that spouses' attri
- Page 87 and 88:
Other studies have acknowledged bot
- Page 89 and 90:
CHAPTER m METHOD Participants Parti
- Page 91 and 92:
(steady dating=61%, engaged=9%, coh
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 2. Distribution of scores for
- Page 95 and 96:
elationship The hems were summed to
- Page 97 and 98:
Beliefs Test (Eiedlson & Epstein, 1
- Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER IV RESULTS Preliminarv Anal
- Page 101 and 102:
^ CN -.16* m .19* .29** O ON O .19*
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 5 Regressions of proximal fac
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 6. Regression of liking on th
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 7 Regression of liking on the
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 8 Hierarchical regression of
- Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER V DISCUSSION This study exa
- Page 113 and 114:
hierarchical level (Costa & McCrae,
- Page 115 and 116:
Finally, the measure of satisfactio
- Page 117 and 118:
"real" me, "I told my partner about
- Page 119 and 120:
For example, openness may be more c
- Page 121 and 122:
examined Neuroticism was negatively
- Page 123 and 124:
Future research should examine how
- Page 125 and 126:
developmental theory would help us
- Page 127 and 128:
Boyle, G. J (1989) Re-examination o
- Page 129 and 130:
Costa, P T , iS: McCrae, R R (1985)
- Page 131 and 132:
Forgas, J , Levinger, G., & Moylan,
- Page 133 and 134:
Kentle, R. L (1994) An examination
- Page 135 and 136:
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989
- Page 137 and 138:
Rusbuh, C. E . Johnson, D J., & Mor
- Page 139 and 140:
Wildman, B. G. (1986) Perception of
- Page 141 and 142:
Subject We would like you to answer
- Page 143 and 144:
IF YOU ARE NOT IN A ROMANTIC RELATI
- Page 145 and 146:
STRONGLY STRONGLY DISAGREE AGREE 1
- Page 147 and 148:
I AM POOR I .AM EXTREMELY .AT THIS
- Page 149 and 150:
Please answer the following questio
- Page 151 and 152:
Next, we are interested in how your
- Page 153 and 154:
NOT AT ALL EXTREMELY 1 2 3 4 5 4 Co