30.10.2012 Views

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DISPERSAL IN MALE PUMAS · Laundré and Hernández 155<br />

Table 1. Average dispersal distances (km), home range sizes (HRS; km 2 ), and home range<br />

diameters (HRD; km) <strong>of</strong> male pumas from various studies. The home range sizes are based on<br />

resident males in <strong>the</strong> study areas. Dispersal distances are only <strong>of</strong> individuals who were known to<br />

establish territories after dispersing or were at least > 24 months old before being killed.<br />

Source n Distance H.R. Size HRD<br />

Lindzey et al. (1989 & 1994) 4 142.2 731.0 30.5<br />

Logan et al. (1986) 3 175.7 320.0 20.2<br />

Spreadbury et al. (1996) 4 74.5 132.3 13.0<br />

Hornocker (1960) &<br />

Seidensticker et al. (1973)<br />

5 102.4 379.5 22.0<br />

Ashman et al. (1983) 6 48.9 355.2 21.3<br />

Logan and Sweanor (2001) 13 128.2 187.1 15.4<br />

This study 13 190.6 302.5 19.6<br />

Averages 123.2 343.9 20.3<br />

at least >24 months old at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

killed (Sweanor et al. 2000). We found<br />

dispersal distances for 48 male pumas from<br />

7 different studies, including 13 estimates<br />

from our study area (Table 1). We did not<br />

use <strong>the</strong> dispersal distances reported by Beier<br />

(1995) because his study area, although<br />

large (2070 km 2 ), was completely<br />

surrounded by urban development, which<br />

limited dispersal opportunities. Dispersal<br />

distances ranged from 31 km (Spreadbury et<br />

al. 1996) to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 550 km (our<br />

study). Estimates <strong>of</strong> resident home range<br />

sizes <strong>of</strong> males in <strong>the</strong>se studies varied<br />

between 132.3 to 731 km 2 (Table 1). The<br />

mean <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se averages was 343.9 km 2 with<br />

a HRD <strong>of</strong> 20.3 km. Dispersal distances<br />

varied from 0.9 to 26 HRDs with a mean <strong>of</strong><br />

6.0 HRDs (Fig. 1). The majority (≈ 50 %)<br />

<strong>of</strong> dispersal distances were between 2 and 4<br />

HRDs with a second peak (25 %) between<br />

8-9 HRD’s. There was a noticeable<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> dispersal settlements between 5<br />

and 7 HRDs (Fig. 1).<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> individual estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

home range size, <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> HRDs<br />

changed in some categories (Fig. 1).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> pattern was similar to <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution based on <strong>the</strong> overall average<br />

HRD, e.g. <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dispersal<br />

PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH MOUNTAIN LION WORKSHOP<br />

distances were between 2 and 4 HRDs. The<br />

one difference was <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> more<br />

settlements in <strong>the</strong> 5-7 HRD range (Fig. 1)<br />

We found estimates <strong>of</strong> male mortality<br />

rates from 4 o<strong>the</strong>r studies (Ashman et al.<br />

1983, Ross and Jalkotzy 1992, Anderson et<br />

al. 1992, Logan and Sweanor 2001) plus our<br />

Figure 1. Frequency distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

dispersal distances, expressed as multiples<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross study average home range<br />

diameter (HRD) and as multiples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

individual study HRDs. The two curves<br />

represent <strong>the</strong> expected frequency<br />

distribution for <strong>the</strong> competition and <strong>the</strong><br />

inbreeding models.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!