Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop
Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop
Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COLORADO MOUNTAIN LION STATUS REPORT<br />
JERRY A. APKER, Colorado Division <strong>of</strong> Wildlife, 0722 South Road 1 East, Monte Vista, CO<br />
81144, USA, email: jerry.apker@state.co.us<br />
MOUNTAIN LION CLASSIFICATION<br />
<strong>Mountain</strong> lion (Puma concolor) received<br />
no legal protection and were classified as a<br />
predator in Colorado from 1881 until 1965.<br />
During this time take <strong>of</strong> puma at any time,<br />
any place was encouraged by bounties and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r laws. The first bounty was enacted in<br />
1881 at $10, in 1925 laws instructed game<br />
wardens to destroy predatory animals by<br />
trapping, poisoning, or hunting, and in 1929<br />
<strong>the</strong> bounty was increased to $50. For<br />
comparison <strong>the</strong> 1929 bounty, if <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />
2003 dollars, would be $540. The bounty<br />
was abolished in 1965, but some provisions<br />
for landowner take <strong>of</strong> a depredating puma<br />
remains in Colorado laws to this day. In<br />
1965, puma were reclassified as big game.<br />
Each Data Analysis Unit (DAU) within<br />
<strong>the</strong> State has a management plan developed<br />
with objectives for hunter harvest, game<br />
damage, and human-puma conflicts.<br />
Objectives are stated as <strong>the</strong> maximum level<br />
on a three-year running average.<br />
Implementation <strong>of</strong> DAU plans began in<br />
2001. Recent interest in annual puma kill<br />
revealed conflicting direction depending<br />
upon which objectives managers weighed<br />
most heavily. These conflicts pointed out a<br />
shortfall within <strong>the</strong> plans in that <strong>the</strong>y do not<br />
state a specific strategic goal for <strong>the</strong> DAU.<br />
Currently this must be inferred in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> plan. Some DAUs are managed to<br />
suppress puma populations while o<strong>the</strong>rs are<br />
managed to maintain stable populations –<br />
recognizing <strong>the</strong> inherent difficulty in<br />
determining population changes. Within <strong>the</strong><br />
next year all management plans will be<br />
required to develop a strategic goal. We<br />
14<br />
<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seventh</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> <strong>Workshop</strong><br />
consider this an essential step for informing<br />
management decisions within a DAU about<br />
season structure and annual license<br />
allocation.<br />
In 1996 <strong>the</strong> Colorado Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture (CDA) was granted “exclusive<br />
jurisdiction over <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> depredating<br />
animals that pose a threat to an agricultural<br />
product or resource”. Thus, CDA has<br />
exclusive authority to determine <strong>the</strong><br />
disposition <strong>of</strong> an individual puma if it is<br />
depredating on livestock, while <strong>the</strong> Colorado<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Wildlife (CDOW) retains<br />
authority to manage puma populations and<br />
all forms <strong>of</strong> recreational or scientific use.<br />
DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE AND<br />
MONITORING<br />
The state is divided into 21 DAUs for<br />
<strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> puma management (Figure<br />
1). DAUs are assemblages <strong>of</strong> Game<br />
Management Units (GMUs) within which<br />
Figure 1. Data analysis Units and relative<br />
abundance <strong>of</strong> puma within each DAU in<br />
Colorado.