30.10.2012 Views

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 IDAHO MOUNTAIN LION STATUS REPORT · Nadeau<br />

<strong>Lion</strong> Harvest<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1960<br />

1962<br />

1964<br />

1966<br />

1968<br />

1970<br />

1972<br />

1974<br />

1976<br />

Unregulated Harvest Regulated<br />

1978<br />

1980<br />

Figure 2. Unregulated mountain lion harvest<br />

from 1960-71, and regulated harvest from<br />

1972 -1981.<br />

Return Wilderness from 1964-1973 added<br />

significantly to our knowledge. As a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research, <strong>the</strong> mountain lion was<br />

reclassified as a big game species in 1972.<br />

Harvest was <strong>the</strong>n able to be regulated and<br />

resulted in some closed units, bag limits, and<br />

shortened seasons. Mandatory reporting<br />

was started in 1973, and a tag has been<br />

required since 1975.<br />

Populations <strong>of</strong> elk and deer continued to<br />

increase across <strong>the</strong> state during <strong>the</strong> 1980’s<br />

and early 1990’s, and <strong>the</strong> resulting mountain<br />

lion population did as well. The apparent<br />

increase in lion populations allowed <strong>the</strong><br />

department to increase opportunity for<br />

harvest. Harvest continued to increase as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> liberalized seasons and increased<br />

populations and peaked in 1997 (Figure 3).<br />

DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE<br />

<strong>Lion</strong>s were distributed across most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

suitable habitat in <strong>the</strong> state (Figure 4).<br />

Management tended to keep lion<br />

populations at a low density in developed<br />

areas or areas with high road density.<br />

However, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas that received<br />

high harvest lay adjacent to lightly roaded<br />

reservoir areas that seemed to continue to<br />

provide dispersing animals. Distribution<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH MOUNTAIN LION WORKSHOP<br />

Harvest<br />

1992<br />

Year<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

<strong>Lion</strong> Harvest<br />

Figure 3. Statewide mountain lion harvest.<br />

The year on <strong>the</strong> x-axis represents <strong>the</strong> date <strong>the</strong><br />

season started, i.e. seasons run from fall<br />

through spring.<br />

Figure 4. Statewide mountain lion harvest by<br />

management unit and lion DAU where<br />

rankings are based on lions harvested/100mi 2<br />

where very low=. 03, low=. 3-.5, moderate=.<br />

6-1.0, high=1.1-2.0, and very high=2.6-3.0.<br />

The shaded units have female lion quotas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!