02.04.2014 Views

Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...

Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...

Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Workload standards should accomplish two goals. The first goal<br />

is to measure the staff needs <strong>of</strong> Offices to meet their statutory<br />

mandates. When <strong>Officers</strong> perform duties beyond these basic statutory<br />

mandates, they should not benefit from this election. Secondly,<br />

when statutes allow <strong>Officers</strong> several alternatives to meet their<br />

responsibilities, the standards should serve as a Statewide measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> performance to distribute positions. We believe ~he staff's<br />

development <strong>of</strong> standards does not meet either <strong>of</strong> these goals.<br />

The Board has undertaken the development <strong>of</strong> workload standards<br />

over the past three years after discussions with and assistance <strong>of</strong><br />

constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficer associations. We recognize the difficulty in<br />

setting Statewide standards, but believe this is a more equitable<br />

method. The Board wishes to advise the Commission that the use <strong>of</strong><br />

standard workload measures may cost the Commonwealth additional<br />

funding. Since workload standards are a primary par~ <strong>of</strong> funding,<br />

localities will move functions into these Offices under the<br />

standards developed by the staff. As in our example, if<br />

re-assessment is part <strong>of</strong> the locality's funding base then the<br />

Assessor's Offices funded directly by the locality will be moved to<br />

the Commissioner's Office.<br />

As an alternative to JLARC<br />

Board suggests the following:<br />

recommendation (1), the Compensation<br />

The General Assembly may wish to consider requiring the<br />

Compensation Board to develop staffing standards for<br />

constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers, and require that the Compensation<br />

Board consider these standards prior to allocating additional<br />

positions. The Standards should be based on measurable<br />

statutory required duties. In developing the standards, the<br />

Compensation Board should allow for participation and input<br />

<strong>of</strong> the constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers and their associations.<br />

Recommendation (2).<br />

The General Assembly may wish to establish a statewide average<br />

staff salary for each constitutional <strong>of</strong>fice for use in determining<br />

the costs recognized for State funding.<br />

WE DISAGREE. The compensation Board has established uniform<br />

salary scales for all positions in all constitutional <strong>of</strong>fices. Job<br />

classifications, pay grades and salary steps were developed in<br />

cooperation with the Department <strong>of</strong> Personnel and Training some years<br />

ago. This results in, for example, the salary <strong>of</strong> a deputy sheriff<br />

in Lee County with 2 years experience being reimbursed by the<br />

Compensation Board at the same amount as a deputy sheriff in<br />

Gloucester County. Perhaps more importantly, it results in 2<br />

employees in the same <strong>of</strong>fice having identical experience and<br />

assigned duties receiving the same rate <strong>of</strong> pay.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!