02.04.2014 Views

Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...

Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...

Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AppendixG<br />

JLARC StaffComments on the<br />

Compensation Board Response<br />

We were pleased to see agreement on some <strong>of</strong> the recommendations in the<br />

response <strong>of</strong> the State Compensation Board. The areas in which there is substantial<br />

agreement can be the basis for continued review and discussion <strong>of</strong> the process for<br />

funding the constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

While there is agreement in some areas, there are a number <strong>of</strong>recommendations<br />

with which the Compensation Board disagrees. The Board's response also seems<br />

to show that there are several important points which the Board misunderstands.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong>these misunderstandings, it was important for JLARC staffto comment on<br />

the major elements <strong>of</strong>the Compensation Board response. These comments follow the<br />

format <strong>of</strong>the Compensation Board response.<br />

With regard to the need for staffing standards, the Compensation Board<br />

recognizes that staffing is currently inequitable. We recognize that in the past there<br />

have not always been sufficient resources to fund the positions requested by the<br />

constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers. However, this does not explain why the positions that have<br />

been available have been allocated in an inequitable manner. Had standards <strong>of</strong> the<br />

type recommended by this report been in use, major discrepancies between workload<br />

and staffing would not have occurred. The Compensation Board has recognized this<br />

fact and has stated in its response that it has begun to develop standards <strong>of</strong>its own.<br />

FISCAL IMPACT<br />

The fiscal impact <strong>of</strong>the proposed staffing standards and the other recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong>this report will be determined by the General Assembly. The two examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> funding at the end <strong>of</strong> this report should not be considered recommendations for<br />

specific funding. The examples are provided only to show how the computer models<br />

developed by JLARC staffcan be used to estimate the impact <strong>of</strong>changes on funding for<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fices. Too many key decisions remain to be made by the General Assembly for the<br />

Compensation Board to accurately judge the fiscal impact <strong>of</strong>any specific recommendation<br />

or set <strong>of</strong>recommendations from this report.<br />

OVERALL IMPACT OF STUDy<br />

The changes to the funding system based on the staff recommendations will<br />

be substantial. The General Assembly will need to consider a specific timetable for<br />

implementation. The final schedule for implementation should take into account the<br />

ability <strong>of</strong>the Compensation Board to implement the proposed changes and the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong>revised funding on the constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers and local governments.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!