Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...
Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...
Funding of Constitutional Officers - Virginia Joint Legislative Audit ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AppendixG<br />
JLARC StaffComments on the<br />
Compensation Board Response<br />
We were pleased to see agreement on some <strong>of</strong> the recommendations in the<br />
response <strong>of</strong> the State Compensation Board. The areas in which there is substantial<br />
agreement can be the basis for continued review and discussion <strong>of</strong> the process for<br />
funding the constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />
While there is agreement in some areas, there are a number <strong>of</strong>recommendations<br />
with which the Compensation Board disagrees. The Board's response also seems<br />
to show that there are several important points which the Board misunderstands.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong>these misunderstandings, it was important for JLARC staffto comment on<br />
the major elements <strong>of</strong>the Compensation Board response. These comments follow the<br />
format <strong>of</strong>the Compensation Board response.<br />
With regard to the need for staffing standards, the Compensation Board<br />
recognizes that staffing is currently inequitable. We recognize that in the past there<br />
have not always been sufficient resources to fund the positions requested by the<br />
constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers. However, this does not explain why the positions that have<br />
been available have been allocated in an inequitable manner. Had standards <strong>of</strong> the<br />
type recommended by this report been in use, major discrepancies between workload<br />
and staffing would not have occurred. The Compensation Board has recognized this<br />
fact and has stated in its response that it has begun to develop standards <strong>of</strong>its own.<br />
FISCAL IMPACT<br />
The fiscal impact <strong>of</strong>the proposed staffing standards and the other recommendations<br />
<strong>of</strong>this report will be determined by the General Assembly. The two examples<br />
<strong>of</strong> funding at the end <strong>of</strong> this report should not be considered recommendations for<br />
specific funding. The examples are provided only to show how the computer models<br />
developed by JLARC staffcan be used to estimate the impact <strong>of</strong>changes on funding for<br />
the <strong>of</strong>fices. Too many key decisions remain to be made by the General Assembly for the<br />
Compensation Board to accurately judge the fiscal impact <strong>of</strong>any specific recommendation<br />
or set <strong>of</strong>recommendations from this report.<br />
OVERALL IMPACT OF STUDy<br />
The changes to the funding system based on the staff recommendations will<br />
be substantial. The General Assembly will need to consider a specific timetable for<br />
implementation. The final schedule for implementation should take into account the<br />
ability <strong>of</strong>the Compensation Board to implement the proposed changes and the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong>revised funding on the constitutional <strong>of</strong>ficers and local governments.<br />
94