03.04.2014 Views

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

13) Not withstanding my belief that TrAILCo is not a WV public utility, para 10.8.1<br />

states, “a public utility operating in West Virginia may not, directly or indirectly,<br />

in any manner or by any device whatsoever, <strong>of</strong>fer or grant to a person any form <strong>of</strong><br />

promotional practice except such as is uniformly and contemporaneously<br />

extended to all persons in the same reasonably defined class.” The techniques<br />

used by agents acting on behalf <strong>of</strong> TrAILCo, as was determined by the<br />

Pennsylvania <strong>Consumer</strong> <strong>Advocate</strong> (Attachment 3) make a clear and convincing<br />

case that these techniques and practices are unlawll. Statements and remarks<br />

were described by Robbie Matestic, Greene Co. Economic Development <strong>Direct</strong>or<br />

as “over and over we hear that the facts <strong>of</strong> the project process and the project are<br />

being misrepresented, and information is not consistent between neighbors. ”<br />

People are being told to take the money because “thisproject is 99% approved.”<br />

14) This shows a clear violation <strong>of</strong> rules, regulations, and the public trust. These<br />

particular examples are from PA but it is reasonable to assume the same types <strong>of</strong><br />

statements, misrepresentation <strong>of</strong> the facts, and high pressure tactics are being used<br />

in West Virginia. I attempted to confirm this by asking discovery question R23 in<br />

<strong>Hildebrand</strong>’s First Set <strong>of</strong> Discovery Requests. TrAILCo objected and said they<br />

were “entirely irrelevant to the Commission ’s consideration <strong>of</strong> request for<br />

TrAIL. ” If unlawful practices by agents employed by TrAIL are also occurring in<br />

West Virginia, these may be highly relevant to the Commission.<br />

Q. YOU STATED TRAIL IS NOT NEEDED. PLEASE EXPLAIN.<br />

A.<br />

1) Mr. George C. Loehr testified in Pennsylvania as a subject matter expert and he has<br />

over 40 years experience in electrical reliability. In his direct testimony before the PA<br />

Public Utility Commission. Mr. Loehr concludes,<br />

“I can unequivocally state that the proposed TrAILCo Project is not needed to<br />

address reliability issues. ’’<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!