Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...
Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...
Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
13) Not withstanding my belief that TrAILCo is not a WV public utility, para 10.8.1<br />
states, “a public utility operating in West Virginia may not, directly or indirectly,<br />
in any manner or by any device whatsoever, <strong>of</strong>fer or grant to a person any form <strong>of</strong><br />
promotional practice except such as is uniformly and contemporaneously<br />
extended to all persons in the same reasonably defined class.” The techniques<br />
used by agents acting on behalf <strong>of</strong> TrAILCo, as was determined by the<br />
Pennsylvania <strong>Consumer</strong> <strong>Advocate</strong> (Attachment 3) make a clear and convincing<br />
case that these techniques and practices are unlawll. Statements and remarks<br />
were described by Robbie Matestic, Greene Co. Economic Development <strong>Direct</strong>or<br />
as “over and over we hear that the facts <strong>of</strong> the project process and the project are<br />
being misrepresented, and information is not consistent between neighbors. ”<br />
People are being told to take the money because “thisproject is 99% approved.”<br />
14) This shows a clear violation <strong>of</strong> rules, regulations, and the public trust. These<br />
particular examples are from PA but it is reasonable to assume the same types <strong>of</strong><br />
statements, misrepresentation <strong>of</strong> the facts, and high pressure tactics are being used<br />
in West Virginia. I attempted to confirm this by asking discovery question R23 in<br />
<strong>Hildebrand</strong>’s First Set <strong>of</strong> Discovery Requests. TrAILCo objected and said they<br />
were “entirely irrelevant to the Commission ’s consideration <strong>of</strong> request for<br />
TrAIL. ” If unlawful practices by agents employed by TrAIL are also occurring in<br />
West Virginia, these may be highly relevant to the Commission.<br />
Q. YOU STATED TRAIL IS NOT NEEDED. PLEASE EXPLAIN.<br />
A.<br />
1) Mr. George C. Loehr testified in Pennsylvania as a subject matter expert and he has<br />
over 40 years experience in electrical reliability. In his direct testimony before the PA<br />
Public Utility Commission. Mr. Loehr concludes,<br />
“I can unequivocally state that the proposed TrAILCo Project is not needed to<br />
address reliability issues. ’’<br />
10