03.04.2014 Views

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

~<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

Q. WITH RESPECT TO THE NEED FOR THIS NEW TRAIL LINE, MUCH HAS<br />

BEEN MADE OF THE GROWING ELECTRICAL DEMAND IN THE STATE OF<br />

VIRGINIA. WHAT IS YOUR ASSESSMENT IN THIS AREA?<br />

A.<br />

1) Northern Virginia has a very large population base. Many may not realize Fairfax<br />

County, VA is not much different in population that the entire State <strong>of</strong> West Virginia.<br />

There are many such large population centers in Virginia, Maryland, <strong>of</strong> Washington,<br />

D.C. As such, this large concentration represents a huge and untapped energy<br />

conservation and efficiency resource. As an example <strong>of</strong> this huge potential to conserve<br />

energy, I <strong>of</strong>fer Attachment 11,2006 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, published June<br />

2007 by the American Council for Energy-Efficient Economy.’ This report shows<br />

Virginia ranked 3gfh among states for Energy Efficiency and Virginia’s Electric Utility<br />

companies tied for last among all 50 States and receiving a score <strong>of</strong> 0 out <strong>of</strong> a possible 15<br />

points for energy efficiency spending. It should also be noted that West Virginia<br />

performed slightly better (ranked 35fh) than Virginia and West Virginia’s utility<br />

companies received one-half <strong>of</strong> one point. The key is that even modest success<br />

improving such measures would eliminate the need for TrAIL. I’d like to remind the<br />

Commission that PJM boasts more than 51 million customers. If each <strong>of</strong> them conserved<br />

an amount equal to a single light bulb, 51 OOMW would be saved. It makes you wonder if<br />

a better alternative to TrAIL might be for the power companies to simply send each<br />

household a coupon in their electric bill for two free compact fluorescent light bulbs from<br />

Home Depot.<br />

2) Attachment 12 is a page out <strong>of</strong> the US. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy’s 2006 Transmission<br />

Congestion Study.” It states, there are three primary ways to deal with long-term<br />

congestion: 1) Build new generation; 2) Build new or upgrade transmission capacity; 3)<br />

Reduce electricity demand through energy efficiency, demand response, and distributed<br />

generation. In TrAILCo’ s application, TrAILCo has chosen to not provide alternatives<br />

using options 1 and 3 and focus entirely on the more controversial additional TrAILCo<br />

line, option 2. Options 1 and 3 would clearly contribute to meeting any reliability and<br />

For brevity, I‘ve only included the referenced pages. The remainder is available upon request.<br />

lo For brevity, I’ve only included the referenced pages. The remainder is available upon request.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!