Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...
Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...
Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A proposed Wise County, Va., 'clean coal' power plant could be among<br />
Virginia's Top I O polluters<br />
httn:~~~~f~~.tricities. corn/tristafe/tri!news. Pri ntView .-content-a rticles-TR f -2007- 10-21 -0025, htm I<br />
Sunday, Oct 21,2007 - 02:OO AM<br />
By Rex Bowman, Media General News Setvice<br />
A $1.6 billion coal-fired power plant proposed for Wise County is touted by the<br />
utility company that wants to build it as an eco-friendly "clean coal" model <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental design.<br />
But if built to the company's specifications, it would be one <strong>of</strong> the biggest air<br />
polluters in Virginia, according to documents filed with the state.<br />
The plant would give Dominion Virginia Power an extra 585 megawatts <strong>of</strong> power.<br />
enough to support 146,000 new homes.<br />
The proposed Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center would be allowed to pump<br />
more than 12,500 tons - or 25 million pounds - <strong>of</strong> pollution into the air each year<br />
if Dominion Virginia Power goes through with its plans. The pollutants include<br />
nitrogen oxides, an ingredient <strong>of</strong> smog; sulfur dioxide, a major cause <strong>of</strong> acid rain:<br />
and carbon monoxide, which can pose serious breathing problems for those with<br />
respiratory ailments.<br />
The emissions are in addition to the 5.3 million tons <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide the plant<br />
could discharge annually, according to company <strong>of</strong>ficials. Carbon dioxide, though<br />
recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a greenhouse gas,<br />
is not regulated as a pollutant.<br />
Dominion Virginia Power points out, however, that the Wise facility would pollute<br />
less than do older plants. The utility is allowed to call the power plant a "clean<br />
coal" operation under rules laid down by the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, which is<br />
encouraging utilities to use certain coal technologies by giving the technologies<br />
the envi ronmen ta 1 I y-friendly sticker.<br />
But environmentalists fighting to stop state approval <strong>of</strong> the power plant say the<br />
"clean coal" label, though sanctioned by the federal government, is a deceptive<br />
marketing practice that could dampen opposition to the plant even though its<br />
construction could spell disaster for the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Appalachian Virginia,<br />
If approved by the State Corporation Commission, the plant would join other<br />
coal-fired power plants at the top <strong>of</strong> the list <strong>of</strong> roughly 2,000 polluters monitored<br />
by the Virginia Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Quality.<br />
"Any time the utility industry adopts a really effective messaging strategy, it<br />
makes our lives more difficult," said Matt Wasson <strong>of</strong> Appalachian Voices, one <strong>of</strong><br />
several groups opposing the power plant. "The label <strong>of</strong> clean coal is, in my