03.04.2014 Views

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

Direct Testimony of Thomas M. Hildebrand - Consumer Advocate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

opinion, a focus group's phrase, and a very effective one, to justify all these<br />

planned coal-fired plants."<br />

James K. Martin, a senior vice president at Dominion Virginia Power, defends the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the term as accurate, illustrating that the proposed plant can be seen two<br />

ways. While environmentalists view the plant as a setback in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

nationwide efforts to curb pollution, power industry <strong>of</strong>ficials such as Martin see<br />

the plant as a step forward in the context <strong>of</strong> evolving energy technology because<br />

it pollutes less than older plants.<br />

For instance, while Dominion Virginia Power is asking for permission to annually<br />

emit more than 12,500 tons <strong>of</strong> pollutants in Virginia City, the company's<br />

Chesterfield County power station - the state's biggest air polluter - released<br />

more than 76,800 tons <strong>of</strong> pollutants into the atmosphere last year.<br />

Furthermore, said Dominion Virginia Power spokesman Dan Genest, a plant the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the one planned for Virginia City potentially could emit more than 167,000<br />

tons <strong>of</strong> nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide into the air each year if none <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art technological controls were in place. With controls, the amount is<br />

projected at about 5,340 tons per year.<br />

"We think it's an exciting technology," Martin said <strong>of</strong> the proposed plant's<br />

cleaning system. He also noted that the plant likely would operate at 90 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> capacity, meaning emissions would never hit the 12,500-ton mark.<br />

Dominion Virginia Power wants to build the power plant on 1,700 acres <strong>of</strong><br />

abandoned strip mine just west <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> St. Paul and fuel it with Virginia<br />

coal and waste wood products.<br />

The company, which hopes to win approval from the State Corporation<br />

Commission by April and have the plant up and running by 2012, says the<br />

electricity is necessary to help it meet an anticipated 4,000-megawatt jump in<br />

demand from Dominion Virginia Power customers by 201 7.<br />

The General Assembly gave its blessing to the plant in 2004, when it decreed as<br />

a public good any power station in Southwest Virginia that used only Virginia<br />

coal. Sen. William C. Wampler Jr., R-Bristol, pushed for the measure, and he<br />

recently said he still supports the plant.<br />

"We have to have it as part <strong>of</strong> the mix to power Virginia,'' he said, adding that the<br />

state should also look at using more nuclear power.<br />

The federal Energy Department regards the proposed Virginia City plant as a<br />

potential "clean coal" operation because it would use a process known as<br />

"circulating fluidized bed combustion technology," or CFB. The process involves

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!