Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Gase v. Gase, 266 Neb. 975, 671 N.W.2d 223 (2003)<br />
While the decision to participate in a retirement plan may be voluntary in the first<br />
instance, where contributions made to the plan thereafter become mandatory, the<br />
minimum contribution required by the plan in effect at the time child support is<br />
calculated is deducted from income in determining a party’s net income.<br />
Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N.W.2d 67 (2007)<br />
Issue: How many years back should a court go in averaging income of parents with fluctuating<br />
income.<br />
As a general matter, in the determination of child support, income from a selfemployed<br />
individual is determined by looking to that person’s tax returns.<br />
(Reviewing) a 3-year average (income) tends to be the most common approach in<br />
cases where a parent’s income tends to fluctuate. It is not necessary for a court to<br />
look back more than three years.<br />
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 916, 653 N.W.2d 226 (2002)<br />
The <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines provide that in calculating the amount of<br />
support to be paid, a court must consider the total monthly income, defined as the<br />
income of both parties derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />
assistance benefits. Social Security disability insurance program benefits are not<br />
means-tested public assistance benefits, but are based on prior earnings of the<br />
recipient, not on the financial need of the recipient.<br />
Mehne v. Hess, 4 Neb. App 935, 553 N.W.2d 482 (1996)<br />
Entire net amount received from personal injury settlement award constitutes income<br />
for child support purposes<br />
Robbins v. Robbins, 3 Neb App. 953, 536 N.W.2d 77 (1995)<br />
Findings regarding an employee's level of income should not be based on the<br />
inclusion of income that is entirely speculative in nature and over which the<br />
employee has little or no control.<br />
Simpson v. Simpson, 275 Neb. 152, 744 N.W.2d 710 (2008)<br />
Paragraph D [now § 4-204] of the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines defines total<br />
monthly income as income “derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />
assistance benefits which includes any earned income tax credit and payments<br />
received for children of prior marriages.” The guidelines are very specific — all<br />
income from all sources is to be included except for those incomes specifically<br />
excluded. Not excluded under the guidelines is compensation meant to offset a<br />
spouse’s increased cost of living while residing in a different locale. We conclude,<br />
therefore, that … expatriate compensation is income for purposes of support<br />
calculations.<br />
But…<br />
Under the facts of this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its<br />
discretion when it determined that Robert’s expatriate compensation is not<br />
reasonably available for child support payments.<br />
State o/b/o Joseph F. v. Rial, 251 Neb. 1, 554 N.W.2d 769 (1996)<br />
- 96 -