04.04.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Temporary child support – see § 42-357.<br />

Temporary <strong>Support</strong><br />

Dartmann v. Dartmann, 14 Neb. App. 864, 717 N.W.2d 519 (2006)<br />

“Temporary support” does not mean the support expires when temporary<br />

order expires and is replaced by final decree, which is silent on issue of temporary<br />

support.<br />

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-369(4) (Reissue 2004) provides, in part, that “[o]rders, decrees,<br />

and judgments for temporary or permanent support or alimony . . . have the force<br />

and effect of judgments when entered.” <strong>Child</strong> support payments become a vested<br />

right of the payee in a dissolution action as they accrue. Gress, supra. See Berg v.<br />

Hayworth, 238 Neb. 527, 471 N.W.2d 435 (1991). A court may not forgive or modify<br />

past-due child support.<br />

[T]he district court may, on motion and satisfactory proof that a judgment has been<br />

paid or satisfied in whole or in part by the act of the parties thereto, order it<br />

discharged and canceled of record, to the extent of the payment or satisfaction.<br />

The case law is clear that the district court’s ability to discharge an arrearage of child<br />

support hinges on satisfactory proof that a judgment has been fully paid or satisfied<br />

by the act of both parties.<br />

Jessen v. Line, 16 Neb. App. 197, 742 N.W.2d 30 (2007)<br />

Facts: Apparently wealthy businessman father plays “hide the ball” with his financial records,<br />

preventing mother from ever seeing them, despite 3 court orders. The court of appeals scolds<br />

both sides for not resolving that issue using the “persuasive powers” of the trial court.<br />

[A temporary child] support order was merely an interlocutory order from which no<br />

appeal could be taken.<br />

The fact that the initial [temporary] child support order was interlocutory militates in<br />

favor of making the final order retroactive<br />

Rickus v. Rickus, 183 Neb. 140, 158 N. W. 2d 540 (1969)<br />

[T]emporary orders in the district court allowing alimony, child support, etc.,<br />

terminate with the rendition of a final decree of divorce or the overruling of a motion<br />

for new trial if one be filed. Hall v. Hall, 176 Neb. 555, 126 N. W. 2d 839<br />

Note: All temporary orders are subject to vacation/termination by court order if the parties<br />

do not timely follow up with a final, permanent order of support. If a temporary order ends<br />

up on the dismissal docket, and dismissed under the case progression standards, the<br />

parties will have to start over again. When paternity is involved, the termination of the case<br />

terminates the finding of paternity, forcing the child support interests to “start from scratch”<br />

with a new complaint for paternity and support.<br />

Termination of Parental Rights<br />

This treatise does not attempt to provide an exhaustive treatment on the issue of<br />

termination of parental rights. However, often times families affected by child support orders we<br />

are charged with enforcing end up in juvenile court with allegations of abuse, neglect, or<br />

abandonment. Particularly with the issue of child abandonment our appellate courts seem to be<br />

taking a harder line as to what constitutes grounds for termination of parental rights. I will list<br />

- 182 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!