Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Temporary child support – see § 42-357.<br />
Temporary <strong>Support</strong><br />
Dartmann v. Dartmann, 14 Neb. App. 864, 717 N.W.2d 519 (2006)<br />
“Temporary support” does not mean the support expires when temporary<br />
order expires and is replaced by final decree, which is silent on issue of temporary<br />
support.<br />
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-369(4) (Reissue 2004) provides, in part, that “[o]rders, decrees,<br />
and judgments for temporary or permanent support or alimony . . . have the force<br />
and effect of judgments when entered.” <strong>Child</strong> support payments become a vested<br />
right of the payee in a dissolution action as they accrue. Gress, supra. See Berg v.<br />
Hayworth, 238 Neb. 527, 471 N.W.2d 435 (1991). A court may not forgive or modify<br />
past-due child support.<br />
[T]he district court may, on motion and satisfactory proof that a judgment has been<br />
paid or satisfied in whole or in part by the act of the parties thereto, order it<br />
discharged and canceled of record, to the extent of the payment or satisfaction.<br />
The case law is clear that the district court’s ability to discharge an arrearage of child<br />
support hinges on satisfactory proof that a judgment has been fully paid or satisfied<br />
by the act of both parties.<br />
Jessen v. Line, 16 Neb. App. 197, 742 N.W.2d 30 (2007)<br />
Facts: Apparently wealthy businessman father plays “hide the ball” with his financial records,<br />
preventing mother from ever seeing them, despite 3 court orders. The court of appeals scolds<br />
both sides for not resolving that issue using the “persuasive powers” of the trial court.<br />
[A temporary child] support order was merely an interlocutory order from which no<br />
appeal could be taken.<br />
The fact that the initial [temporary] child support order was interlocutory militates in<br />
favor of making the final order retroactive<br />
Rickus v. Rickus, 183 Neb. 140, 158 N. W. 2d 540 (1969)<br />
[T]emporary orders in the district court allowing alimony, child support, etc.,<br />
terminate with the rendition of a final decree of divorce or the overruling of a motion<br />
for new trial if one be filed. Hall v. Hall, 176 Neb. 555, 126 N. W. 2d 839<br />
Note: All temporary orders are subject to vacation/termination by court order if the parties<br />
do not timely follow up with a final, permanent order of support. If a temporary order ends<br />
up on the dismissal docket, and dismissed under the case progression standards, the<br />
parties will have to start over again. When paternity is involved, the termination of the case<br />
terminates the finding of paternity, forcing the child support interests to “start from scratch”<br />
with a new complaint for paternity and support.<br />
Termination of Parental Rights<br />
This treatise does not attempt to provide an exhaustive treatment on the issue of<br />
termination of parental rights. However, often times families affected by child support orders we<br />
are charged with enforcing end up in juvenile court with allegations of abuse, neglect, or<br />
abandonment. Particularly with the issue of child abandonment our appellate courts seem to be<br />
taking a harder line as to what constitutes grounds for termination of parental rights. I will list<br />
- 182 -