04.04.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wilson v. Wilson, 224 Neb. 589, 399 N.W.2d 802 (1987)<br />

The Mother of all parenting/visitation schedule cases. Considered the “Holy Grail” in Family<br />

Law for over two decades.<br />

Default Judgments/Paternity<br />

§ 25-2001(1) (Reissue 2008)<br />

The inherent power of a district court to vacate or modify its<br />

judgments or orders during term may also be exercised after the end of<br />

the term, upon the same grounds, upon a motion filed within six<br />

months after the entry of the judgment or order.<br />

§43-1412. Paternity; action to establish; procedure; public<br />

hearings prohibited; evidence; default judgment; decree; payment of costs and fees.<br />

(Reissue 2004)<br />

(1) ….<br />

(2) A default judgment shall be entered upon a showing of service and failure of the defendant to<br />

answer or otherwise appear.<br />

Fredericks v. Western Livestock Auction Co., 225 Neb. 211, 403 N.W.2d 377 (1987)<br />

A “ default judgment will not ordinarily be set aside on the application of a party who,<br />

by his own fault, negligence, or want of diligence, has failed to protect his own<br />

interests. . . .’”<br />

Joyce v. Joyce, 229 Neb. 831, 834, 429 N.W.2d 355 (1988)<br />

This court held in Tejral v. Tejral, 220 Neb. 264, 267, 369 N.W.2d 359, 361 (1985)<br />

that "where a party in a dissolution of marriage case is served personally with a<br />

summons and a copy of the petition in the case, and that party chooses not to file<br />

any pleading nor to enter an appearance in the case, and has not otherwise<br />

requested notice of hearing, notice of default hearing need not be given to such<br />

party. We further hold that it is an abuse of the trial court's discretion under § 42-<br />

372 to set aside a dissolution decree, properly entered, on the sole basis that notice<br />

of hearing was not sent to the party in default of filing any pleading or entering an<br />

appearance in the case." The same rule is applicable in a URESA [Revised Uniform<br />

Reciprocal <strong>Enforcement</strong> of <strong>Support</strong> Act] case.<br />

The same rule is also applicable in this case. Appellant failed to file an appearance or<br />

a pleading in this case. Local court rules do not supersede the common law of this<br />

state. Notice of the default hearing was not required, and therefore appellant's third<br />

assignment of error is without merit." Starr v. King, at 342.<br />

State on behalf of A.E. vs. Buckhalter, 273 Neb. 443, 730 N.W.2d 340 (2007)<br />

[A] party who is served with summons and a copy of the complaint and fails to<br />

answer or make an appearance in a case is not entitled to further notice of a<br />

hearing.<br />

“A party’s voluntary inaction and inattention should not be permitted to paralyze<br />

the ordinary and orderly functioning of the legal process.” Citing Tejral v. Tejral,<br />

220 Neb. 264, 369 N.W.2d 359 (1985).<br />

- 51 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!