Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A decree awarding alimony and child support in an action for divorce does not<br />
become dormant by lapse of time and the defense of the statute of limitations is not<br />
available to defeat recovery of delinquent payments.<br />
Foster v. Foster, 266 Neb. 32, 662 NW2d 191 (2003)<br />
It is clear that the marriage dissolution statutes do not empower district courts to<br />
order a parent to contribute to the support of children beyond their majority.<br />
Groseth v. Groseth, 257 Neb. 525, 600 N.W.2d 159 (1999)<br />
Courts have jurisdiction to enforce court-approved settlement agreements wherein a<br />
parent voluntarily promises to support a child beyond the age of majority.<br />
Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 916, 653 N.W.2d 226 (2002)<br />
Parents have a duty to support their minor children until they reach majority or are<br />
emancipated, and a parent is not relieved of this duty by virtue of divorce. [see Neb.<br />
Rev. Stat. § 42-371.01]<br />
In effect, the mother asks us to read the word “minor” out of the statute and to add<br />
words such as to include adult children who are handicapped to the extent they<br />
cannot support themselves. More than that, she wishes us to write into the statute a<br />
requirement that divorced parents maintain their handicapped offspring in an<br />
institution of higher learning to an indefinite age. This we cannot do.<br />
Henke v. Guerrero, 13 Neb. App. 337, 692 N.W.2d 762 (2005)<br />
The requirement of support begins at the time of the birth of a child, whether the<br />
child is born in lawful wedlock or otherwise.<br />
Kracman v. Kracman, 232 Neb. 152, 440 N.W.2d 194 (1989)<br />
In this case, custodial parent sought to waive all past due child support as part of a joint<br />
application to modify support. The court refused to go along with the stipulation.<br />
Questions of custody and support are not controllable by agreement of the parties.<br />
Eliker v. Eliker, 206 Neb. 764, 295 N.W.2d 268 (1980)<br />
Courts are without authority to reduce the amount of accrued child support (absent<br />
equitable estoppel).<br />
Meyers v. Meyers, 222 Neb. 370, 383 N.W.2d 784 (1986).<br />
§ 42-364 is clear and unambiguous in conferring authority to compel divorced<br />
parents to support minor children, but also clear and.unambiguous in conferring no<br />
authority for the support of adult.children.<br />
The dissolution statutes do not empower courts to order a parent to contribute to the<br />
support of an adult handicapped child.<br />
But distinguish:<br />
Parents can agree to enter into a property settlementfagreement.that, among other<br />
things, calls for one parent to support aachild of the.marriage beyond that child’s emancipation.<br />
Such.agreements may be.binding and enforceable by the district court (but. Not the child<br />
support.authorities).<br />
Morrill <strong>County</strong> v. Darsaklis, 7 Neb. App. 489, 584 N.W.2d 36 (1998)<br />
A parent is required to provide his or her child with the basic necessities of life.<br />
- 60 -