04.04.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Erica J. v. Dewitt, 265 Neb. 728, 659 N.W.2d 315 (2003)<br />

A court is not justified in crediting $100 of the NCP’s bankruptcy plan payment<br />

directly against the initial child support that was computed based upon the combined<br />

monthly net income of both parents, in order to reduce the NCP’s child support<br />

obligation.<br />

Faaborg v. Faaborg; 254 Neb. 501, 576 N.W.2d 826 (1998)<br />

Discusses high income cases, where a party has monthly income exceeding<br />

$10,000. (note: present guidelines address net income up to $15,000 per month)<br />

Gartner v. Hume, 12 Neb. App. 741, 686 N.W.2d 58 (2004)<br />

The main principle behind the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines is to recognize<br />

the equal duty of both parents to contribute to the support of their children in<br />

proportion to their respective net incomes.<br />

Under certain circumstances, an amendment to the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong><br />

Guidelines can itself be considered a material change in circumstances<br />

warranting modification of a parent’s child support obligation.<br />

[T]ier II railroad retirement contributions constitute mandatory retirement<br />

contributions and, as such, are deductible under paragraph E(4) of the Guidelines.<br />

Gase v. Gase, 266 Neb. 975, 671 N.W.2d 223 (2003)<br />

Interpretation of the <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines presents a question of<br />

law, regarding which an appellate court is obligated to reach a conclusion<br />

independent of the determination reached by the court below.<br />

The owner of a wholly owned subchapter S corporation is self-employed within the<br />

meaning of the child support guidelines.<br />

Gress v. Gress, 274 Neb. 686, 743 N.W.2d 67 (2007)<br />

Absent a clearly articulated justification, any deviation from the NCSG is an<br />

abuse of discretion.<br />

(the trial) court abused its discretion if its child support order drives (the noncustodial<br />

parent’s) income below the poverty line set forth in paragraph R.<br />

(Reviewing) a 3-year average (income) tends to be the most common approach in<br />

cases where a parent’s income tends to fluctuate. It is not necessary for a court to<br />

look back more than three years.<br />

Daycare and medical reimbursement obligations are also subject to paragraph R's<br />

[ now § 4-218’s] basic subsistence limitation.<br />

Henderson v. Henderson, 264 Neb. 916, 653 N.W.2d 226 (2002)<br />

The <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> Guidelines provide that in calculating the amount of<br />

support to be paid, a court must consider the total monthly income, defined as the<br />

income of both parties derived from all sources, except all means-tested public<br />

assistance benefits. Social Security disability insurance program benefits are not<br />

means-tested public assistance benefits, but are based on prior earnings of the<br />

recipient, not on the financial need of the recipient.<br />

A noncustodial parent is entitled to credit against a monthly child support obligation<br />

for Social Security benefits paid to his or her minor child as a result of the<br />

noncustodial parent’s disability.<br />

- 84 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!