Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
All <strong>Nebraska</strong> IV-D court orders or foreign orders registered under UIFSA or RURESA in <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />
are eligible for a review for possible modification of the child support amount and inclusion of health<br />
insurance if the following criteria are met:<br />
1. The order is for current support;<br />
2. The order is an active <strong>Nebraska</strong> order;<br />
3. The order is not a tribal order;<br />
4. The order is not an order registered for income withholding only;<br />
5. At least one party resides in <strong>Nebraska</strong>;<br />
6. <strong>Nebraska</strong> maintains continuing exclusive jurisdiction under UIFSA or is the proper state to<br />
acquire continuing exclusive jurisdiction under UIFSA for the support order;<br />
7. The non-custodial party is not institutionalized or incarcerated;<br />
8. The current order for support is at least three years old;<br />
9. The order has not been reviewed by <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Support</strong> <strong>Enforcement</strong> in the last three years,<br />
except:<br />
a. an order may be reviewed after one year if it was not referred for a modification because of<br />
financial circumstances lasting for the time period stated in 466 NAC 8-007, number 1; or<br />
b. the requesting party demonstrates a substantial change in financial circumstances that has<br />
lasted for the time period stated in 466 NAC 8-007, number 1.<br />
10. The youngest child in the order will not emancipate within the next 12 months;<br />
11. The location of all parties involved is known; and<br />
12. The order does not require a change in custody to effectuate the modification of support.<br />
Brewer v. Brewer, 244 Neb. 731, 509 N.W.2d 10 (1993)<br />
a request to credit Social Security benefits is a request for a change in only the<br />
source of payment, paid on behalf of the employee, and therefore does not require a<br />
modification hearing, but, rather, only an opportunity for the custodial parent to<br />
adduce evidence of any inequity that might occur as the result of crediting those<br />
benefits to court-ordered child support.<br />
Brodrick v. Baumgarten, 19 Neb. App. 228, 809 N.W.2d 799 (2011)<br />
Facts: parties modify their support order and indicate the new support amount is an upward<br />
deviation from the guidelines. Five months later dad files to modify support back to what the<br />
guidelines would have set it at ($0). District court finds a material change in financial<br />
circumstances despite the fact the parents’ incomes are exactly the same.<br />
Held: No modification is warranted. Parties cannot use a prior deviation from the guidelines as<br />
THE grounds to re-modify to a support amount with no deviation when nothing else changes.<br />
A party seeking to modify a child support order must show a material change in<br />
circumstances which (1) occurred subsequent to the entry of the original decree or<br />
previous modification and (2) was not contemplated when the decree was entered.<br />
Among the factors to be considered in determining whether a material change of<br />
circumstances has occurred are (1) changes in the financial position of the parent<br />
obligated to pay support, (2) the needs of the children for whom support is paid, (3)<br />
good or bad faith motive of an obligated parent in sustaining a reduction in income,<br />
and (4) whether the change is temporary or permanent.<br />
Brooks v. Brooks, 261 Neb. 289, 622 N.W.2d 670 (2001)<br />
There is no precise mathematical formula for calculating child support when subsequent<br />
children are involved.<br />
The calculation is left to the discretion of the court as long as the court considered<br />
the obligations to both families and the income of the other parent of the subsequent<br />
children.<br />
- 129 -