Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dartmann v. Dartmann, 14 Neb. App. 864, 717 N.W.2d 519 (2006)<br />
[T]he district court’s ability to discharge an arrearage of child support hinges on<br />
satisfactory proof that a judgment has been fully paid or satisfied by the act of<br />
both parties. Neb. Rev. Stat. §42-369(4) (Reissue 2004) provides, in part, that<br />
“[o]rders, decrees, and judgments for temporary or permanent support or alimony<br />
. . . have the force and effect of judgments when entered.” A court may not<br />
forgive or modify past-due child support.<br />
<strong>Child</strong> support payments become a vested right of the payee in a dissolution<br />
action as they accrue.<br />
Where the final decree is silent with respect to accrued, unpaid temporary child<br />
support, it remains a judgment against the obligated parent. However, the<br />
district court may, on motion and satisfactory proof that a judgment has been<br />
paid or satisfied in whole or in part by the act of the parties thereto, order it<br />
discharged and canceled of record, to the extent of the payment or satisfaction.<br />
Eliker v. Eliker, 206 Neb. 764, 295 N.W.2d 268 (1980)<br />
Requests for admissions (made upon the county attorney) were irrelevant, not<br />
only to the proceedings under § 42-358, but to the action brought pursuant to §<br />
42-364.01 as well.<br />
When a court orders the payment of child support, it means to have such order<br />
followed. We cannot be more emphatic in that regard.<br />
Gase v. Gase, 266 Neb. 975, 671 N.W.2d 223 (2003)<br />
The <strong>Nebraska</strong> Supreme Court will take judicial notice of general rules and<br />
regulations established and published by <strong>Nebraska</strong> state agencies under<br />
authority of law. Likewise, the court will take judicial notice of rules and<br />
regulations established and published by federal agencies under authority of law.<br />
Golden Five Inc. v. Dept. of Social Services, 229 Neb. 148, 425 N.W.2d 865<br />
(1988)<br />
In Re Applications A-16027 Et Al., 242 Neb. 315, 495 N.W.2d 23 (1993)<br />
[T]he Department (of Health and Human Services) has no power to declare a<br />
statute unconstitutional.<br />
The power to declare an act of the Legislature unconstitutional is a judicial power<br />
reserved solely to the courts under the division of powers between the legislative,<br />
executive, and judicial branches of government set forth in the <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />
Constitution.<br />
Harvey v. Harvey, 6 Neb. App. 524, 575 N.W. 2d 167 (1998)<br />
Part and parcel of the notion that a foreign divorce decree, or as in this case an<br />
order of support, may be collaterally attacked in this state is the doctrine of the<br />
divisibility of foreign divorce decrees. “The ‘divisibility doctrine’ holds that<br />
while a state court may have jurisdiction over the marriage to cause its<br />
termination, that same court may lack personal jurisdiction to adjudicate<br />
‘personal matters’ such as support or alimony.” Tiedeman v. Tiedeman, 195<br />
Neb. 15, 17, 236 N.W.2d 807, 809 (1975).<br />
Although a court may have jurisdiction so that the termination of the marital<br />
status is entitled to full faith and credit, this recognition may be withheld from an<br />
accompanying money judgment when personal jurisdiction is lacking.<br />
- 194 -