04.04.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dartmann v. Dartmann, 14 Neb. App. 864, 717 N.W.2d 519 (2006)<br />

[T]he district court’s ability to discharge an arrearage of child support hinges on<br />

satisfactory proof that a judgment has been fully paid or satisfied by the act of<br />

both parties. Neb. Rev. Stat. §42-369(4) (Reissue 2004) provides, in part, that<br />

“[o]rders, decrees, and judgments for temporary or permanent support or alimony<br />

. . . have the force and effect of judgments when entered.” A court may not<br />

forgive or modify past-due child support.<br />

<strong>Child</strong> support payments become a vested right of the payee in a dissolution<br />

action as they accrue.<br />

Where the final decree is silent with respect to accrued, unpaid temporary child<br />

support, it remains a judgment against the obligated parent. However, the<br />

district court may, on motion and satisfactory proof that a judgment has been<br />

paid or satisfied in whole or in part by the act of the parties thereto, order it<br />

discharged and canceled of record, to the extent of the payment or satisfaction.<br />

Eliker v. Eliker, 206 Neb. 764, 295 N.W.2d 268 (1980)<br />

Requests for admissions (made upon the county attorney) were irrelevant, not<br />

only to the proceedings under § 42-358, but to the action brought pursuant to §<br />

42-364.01 as well.<br />

When a court orders the payment of child support, it means to have such order<br />

followed. We cannot be more emphatic in that regard.<br />

Gase v. Gase, 266 Neb. 975, 671 N.W.2d 223 (2003)<br />

The <strong>Nebraska</strong> Supreme Court will take judicial notice of general rules and<br />

regulations established and published by <strong>Nebraska</strong> state agencies under<br />

authority of law. Likewise, the court will take judicial notice of rules and<br />

regulations established and published by federal agencies under authority of law.<br />

Golden Five Inc. v. Dept. of Social Services, 229 Neb. 148, 425 N.W.2d 865<br />

(1988)<br />

In Re Applications A-16027 Et Al., 242 Neb. 315, 495 N.W.2d 23 (1993)<br />

[T]he Department (of Health and Human Services) has no power to declare a<br />

statute unconstitutional.<br />

The power to declare an act of the Legislature unconstitutional is a judicial power<br />

reserved solely to the courts under the division of powers between the legislative,<br />

executive, and judicial branches of government set forth in the <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />

Constitution.<br />

Harvey v. Harvey, 6 Neb. App. 524, 575 N.W. 2d 167 (1998)<br />

Part and parcel of the notion that a foreign divorce decree, or as in this case an<br />

order of support, may be collaterally attacked in this state is the doctrine of the<br />

divisibility of foreign divorce decrees. “The ‘divisibility doctrine’ holds that<br />

while a state court may have jurisdiction over the marriage to cause its<br />

termination, that same court may lack personal jurisdiction to adjudicate<br />

‘personal matters’ such as support or alimony.” Tiedeman v. Tiedeman, 195<br />

Neb. 15, 17, 236 N.W.2d 807, 809 (1975).<br />

Although a court may have jurisdiction so that the termination of the marital<br />

status is entitled to full faith and credit, this recognition may be withheld from an<br />

accompanying money judgment when personal jurisdiction is lacking.<br />

- 194 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!