Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Marr v. Marr, Jr., 245 Neb. 655, 515 N.W.2d 118 (1994)
Facts: Obligated parent/self employed paving contractor tried to get his child support modified
and reduced, but evidence showed he owed $14,000 in past due support and had made no real
effort to pay support despite earning a modest income. Held: Unclean hands prevents the
court from modifying his support order.
"He who seeks equity must do equity" and … a party seeking equitable relief must
come into court with "clean hands
Had appellant presented a record where he consistently attempted to discharge his
duty to support his child, in an amount reflecting a bona fide effort to perform his
parental (and court-ordered) duty of support, a different case might be presented
Snodgrass v. Snodgrass, 241 Neb. 43, 486 N.W.2d 215 (1992)
Facts: Noncustodial father, after having been found to be in willful contempt of court for failure to
make child support payments for his two minor children, filed an application to modify the
divorce decree. In the application, he alleged that he was not the father of the older child and
sought a paternity determination as well as custody of the younger child. The mother of the
children successfully contended that the application should be dismissed on the ground that the
petitioner had failed to come to the court with clean hands by virtue of the contempt order and
child support arrearage.
In affirming the district court’s dismissal of the application, we determined that it was
supported by a record which showed that the “[father’s] conduct since the dissolution
of the marriage has been to pay no child support unless compelled by the court” and
that it was his “flagrant and continuing contempt of court” which precluded him from
obtaining relief.
State o/b/o Pathammavong v. Pathammavong, 268 Neb. 1, 679 N.W.2d 749 (2004)
When a party owes past-due child support, the failure to pay must be found to be a
willful failure to pay, in spite of an ability to pay, before an application to modify child
support may be dismissed on the basis of unclean hands.
Voichoskie v. Voichoskie, 215 Neb. 775, 340 N.W.2d 442 (1983)
Conduct which forms a basis for a finding that a party has “unclean hands” must be
willful in nature.
Citing 1 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (3d ed.) sec. 397: ‘Whenever a party,
who, as actor, seeks to set the judicial machinery in motion and obtain some
remedy, has violated conscience, or good faith, or other equitable principle, in his
prior conduct, then the doors of the court will be shut against him in limine; the court
will refuse to interfere on his behalf, to acknowledge his right, or to award him any
remedy.’
Visitation Credits
§ 4-210 of the guidelines provides in part:
Visitation or parenting time adjustments or direct cost sharing should be specified in the
support order. An adjustment in child support may be made at the discretion of the court when
visitation or parenting time substantially exceeds alternating weekends and holidays and 28 days
or more in any 90-day period. During visitation or parenting time periods of 28 days or more in
- 192 -