24.04.2014 Views

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HARNESS TRACKS OF AMERICA<br />

Executive Newsletter<br />

A daily fax and e-mail report on racing and gaming developments in North <strong>America</strong> and beyond<br />

Stanley F. Bergstein, Editor June 28, <strong>2002</strong><br />

INDY DOWNS INVESTIGATION<br />

Joe Gorajec, executive director <strong>of</strong> the Indiana<br />

Horse Racing Commission, has notified Indianapolis<br />

Downs, currently building a track near the capitol<br />

city, that it is under investigation and that he<br />

has recommended it be fined $1.2 million for nondisclosure<br />

<strong>of</strong> information that has “seriously tarnished<br />

the reputation and the image <strong>of</strong> the Commission.”<br />

The allegations concern seven findings <strong>of</strong> fact<br />

charging nondisclosure involving the role and actions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Larry Mohr, who the commission says<br />

acted as advisor and consultant for Indianapolis<br />

Downs during its license application hearings. The<br />

allegations contend Mohr had improper communications<br />

with commission members on at least five<br />

occasions during that period. The track contends<br />

Mohr’s services and those <strong>of</strong> DSB Associates, the<br />

firm with which he was affiliated, were “fully disclosed<br />

to the Commission in Indianapolis Downs’<br />

February 2001 Shelby county permit application.”<br />

Gorajec calls that statement “an insult to the intelligence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Commission, its staff, the horse<br />

racing community in Indiana and the general public,”<br />

and says “There is simply no reasonable way<br />

to arrive at the conclusion suggested by Indianapolis<br />

Downs when a fair and objective analysis<br />

is made <strong>of</strong> facts which have been long known to<br />

them but which have only recently been provided<br />

to the Commission.”<br />

Gorajec’s recommendation to the Commission<br />

calls for a $1 million fine for nondisclosures, and a<br />

$200,000 fine for “attempting to perpetrate a misrepresentation<br />

on the Commission.” His letter to<br />

Indianapolis Downs’ attorneys called the charges<br />

“a very serious <strong>of</strong>fense,” and he closed his letter<br />

by saying, “When it comes to disclosing<br />

required information, you don’t play ‘hideand-seek’<br />

with the Indiana Horse Racing<br />

Commission.”<br />

HOW ABOUT A BILLION?<br />

As expected, the Illinois Gaming Board unveiled<br />

a plan yesterday to hold an open, competitive auction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the state’s last gaming license, one that<br />

could bring a casino to the immediate Chicago area.<br />

The auction sale, regardless <strong>of</strong> what it brought,<br />

would compensate the investors in the embattled<br />

and stalemated Emerald Casino only what they had<br />

invested, and no more. The gaming board is expected<br />

to vote on the proposal next Monday. While<br />

new money would not enrich the original investors,<br />

the proposal calls for the successful buyer to pick<br />

up as much as $150 million in lawyers’ fees and<br />

other liabilities incurred by Emerald during the last<br />

three years <strong>of</strong> bitter litigation. That money includes<br />

a parking garage already built and a steel skeleton<br />

<strong>of</strong> the stalled casino in suburban Rosemont,<br />

which may or may not be the location <strong>of</strong> the casino,<br />

when it finally gets built. No commitment<br />

has been made on that, but the fact that the successful<br />

buyer would have to pay for the garage<br />

and existing steel structure, and has a favorable<br />

city management behind the idea, now makes it<br />

seem that Rosemont may wind up with the casino<br />

after all. Gaming board chief Philip Parenti thinks<br />

the bidding process will determine if the $669 million<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered earlier by MGM/Mirage could be “the<br />

high water mark or whether it could be higher,”<br />

and the attorney for the board thinks the license<br />

might be worth a billion dollars. The managing<br />

director <strong>of</strong> J.P. Morgan in New York, Harry Curtis,<br />

disagrees strongly. He says, “if they think they’re<br />

going to get someone to pay a billion dollars in a<br />

state where the legislature is clearly anti-gaming,<br />

then they’re smoking something. For them to use<br />

the gaming industry as a whipping boy by taking<br />

their tax rate up 10% is going to scare any potential<br />

buyer from paying a premium for that license.”<br />

MGM/Mirage already dropped out <strong>of</strong> the bidding<br />

after the tax hike on riverboat casinos.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!