24.04.2014 Views

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HARNESS TRACKS OF AMERICA<br />

Executive Newsletter<br />

A daily fax and e-mail report on racing and gaming developments in North <strong>America</strong> and beyond<br />

Stanley F. Bergstein, Editor<br />

THE GOVERNOR SPEAKS OUT<br />

The Arizona Supreme Court slammed the door on<br />

the state’s racetracks yesterday, denying an injunction<br />

request by the state’s horse and dog tracks<br />

to stop Gov. Jane Hull from signing gambling compacts<br />

with Indian tribes. It was the third time in<br />

three days that the tracks lost in court, and this<br />

time the governor, with a mandate from voters,<br />

took to the press to give her response. In a long<br />

open letter titled “My Turn” in The Arizona Republic,<br />

the state’s biggest newspaper, she thanked<br />

voters for supporting Proposition 202, which denied<br />

the tracks slots, and gave her rationale for<br />

her actions. “I spent my first years in Arizona as<br />

a teacher on an Indian reservation,” the governor<br />

wrote, “and saw poverty so pervasive that the<br />

memory lingers even now. In time, my family grew<br />

and prospered and Arizona grew and prospered.<br />

However, prosperity didn’t extend to our Indian<br />

reservations.” Gov. Hull went on to say she was<br />

skeptical at first that gaming would improve Indian<br />

lives, but she came to see that gaming “had<br />

made a real difference to thousands <strong>of</strong> tribal members<br />

in Arizona.” For that reason, she said, she<br />

began to renegotiate compacts. She accused the<br />

state’s tracks <strong>of</strong> “a campaign <strong>of</strong> misinformation<br />

and litigation,” and said millions were spent to create<br />

confusion at the ballot box. She concluded by<br />

saying that the voters <strong>of</strong> Arizona had spoken, and<br />

she intended to sign new compacts before the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> her term. “It is time,” the governor wrote, “to<br />

put this issue to bed.”<br />

COMMISSIONERS SPEAK, TOO<br />

While Arizona’s governor spoke out, deposed racing<br />

commissioners in neighboring New Mexico had<br />

their say too. Three <strong>of</strong> them, fired by Gov. Gary<br />

Johnson to keep them from voting on a new track<br />

on the Texas border, wrote letters calling<br />

their dismissal “New Mexico politics at<br />

its worst.”<br />

November 27, <strong>2002</strong><br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the controversy is the issue <strong>of</strong> R. D.<br />

Hubbard’s application for the new license, in view<br />

<strong>of</strong> his problems that led to him losing his license to<br />

operate in Indiana in the now famous case <strong>of</strong> importing<br />

prostitutes from Las Vegas. The New<br />

Mexico Gaming Control Board’s attorney had recommended<br />

Hubbard’s license not be renewed, but<br />

the commission chose to vote on it despite that<br />

fact, and the governor ended that prospect by firing<br />

three <strong>of</strong> them, leaving the commission without<br />

a quorum to act. The incoming governor, Bill<br />

Richardson, favors a track in Hobbs, and the betting<br />

in New Mexico is that Hubbard will be the<br />

man who gets to build it.<br />

WINNING IS THE GAME, FOLKS<br />

First the Greektown Casino in Detroit, and now<br />

Suffolk Downs in Boston. The Detroit casino<br />

barred nine gamblers who were winning too much<br />

at video poker, and tried to rationalize their decision<br />

by saying it would open up machine opportunities<br />

for others who weren’t winning. Suffolk<br />

Downs in Boston went to the Massachusetts racing<br />

commission and asked to conduct win betting<br />

only on state-bred races, and got it. The move<br />

came after the track had a $24,000 minus pool after<br />

a plunger bet $310,000 to show on a state-bred<br />

race for juvenile fillies. Instead <strong>of</strong> going to the<br />

legislature to get the $2.20 minimum pay<strong>of</strong>f in<br />

Massachusetts changed to $2.10, Suffolk asked<br />

for the “win only” provision, and used it in the<br />

Massachusetts Oaks, where the 3-10 favorite<br />

wound up second in a six-horse field, beaten 12<br />

lengths by a filly owned by a 14-year-old high<br />

school student. The Boston Herald had fun with<br />

the story, and in Detroit Free Press columnist Brian<br />

Dickerson took Greektown apart, saying its<br />

publicist’s claim that the casino “loves winners” is<br />

like saying Augusta National “values diversity.”<br />

We’re <strong>of</strong>f for Thanksgiving, but will be back<br />

with more Friday. Have a great holiday.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!