24.04.2014 Views

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

2002 - Harness Tracks of America, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HARNESS TRACKS OF AMERICA<br />

Executive Newsletter<br />

A daily fax and e-mail report on racing and gaming developments in North <strong>America</strong> and beyond<br />

Stanley F. Bergstein, Editor<br />

“IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN”<br />

That was the boast -- or promise -- <strong>of</strong> powerful<br />

Republican state senator William Gormley after<br />

a meeting <strong>of</strong> New Jersey’s Economic Growth Committee<br />

yesterday to discuss slots for the Meadowlands.<br />

Gormley told reporters following the meeting<br />

that the bill never will make it out <strong>of</strong> committee<br />

stage. “It’s not going to happen. It will never<br />

happen,” Gormley said. Representing Atlantic<br />

City casinos as he does, Gormley’s statements<br />

were hardly surprising. But what actually happens<br />

is more likely to involve New Jersey’s budget woes<br />

and what happens to New Jersey wagering after<br />

Pennsylvania, New York and Maryland introduce<br />

slots at their tracks. For one thing, Gormley may<br />

be good at politics but is poor at arithmetic. He<br />

tossed around numbers yesterday, saying slots at<br />

the Meadowlands would gut an industry that provides<br />

50,000 jobs -- Atlantic City cocktail waitresses,<br />

dealers, etc. -- for one that provides 5,000,<br />

but he presumably ignored the very substantial<br />

agricultural industry in New Jersey that includes<br />

farms, training centers, and green space throughout<br />

the state.<br />

HOW TO AVERT A PROBLEM<br />

The New Mexico Racing Commission has been<br />

agonizing over applicants for a license to open a<br />

racetrack in Hobbs, in the southeastern part <strong>of</strong><br />

the state. One <strong>of</strong> the applicants is R. D. Hubbard,<br />

who was ousted this year from his role with Pinnacle<br />

gaming in Indiana. Another was Shawn Scott,<br />

who has had some licensing problems <strong>of</strong> his own.<br />

The governor <strong>of</strong> New Mexico, Gary Johnson,<br />

wasn’t anxious to have the issue resolved right<br />

now, preferring to find out if New Mexico needs<br />

another track and how it would affect Indian tribes.<br />

So he fired the entire commission, his spokesman<br />

saying they had deserted their initial philosophy<br />

that the state had enough tracks.<br />

November 19, <strong>2002</strong><br />

HOW TO KEEP A FIRE BURNING<br />

One way to make sure a scandal stays in the media<br />

is to keep hashing it over even after the problem<br />

has been discovered and is being fixed. The<br />

NTRA, determined to show that it is on top <strong>of</strong> this<br />

thing, now has announced that it’s wagering technology<br />

group will go back and review more than<br />

1,000 pick four and pick six wagers around the<br />

nation made within the last year. What that will do<br />

for public confidence is not clear, other than keep<br />

the issue alive and the NTRA name in front <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public. All that talent at NTRA apparently thinks<br />

this is a wonderful public relations move. We hope<br />

it doesn’t mind at least one dissenting vote.<br />

DECISIVE ACTION IN INDIANA<br />

The Indiana Horse Racing Commission took decisive<br />

action yesterday on two issues brought before<br />

it by Indiana Downs, scheduled to open its<br />

inaugural season Dec. 6.<br />

In one, the commission refused Indiana Downs’<br />

request to split $11 million in riverboat subsidies<br />

for <strong>2002</strong> equally between it and Hoosier Park, and<br />

voted to enforce the existing rule that the subsidy<br />

revenues would be split between the two tracks on<br />

the bases <strong>of</strong> purses generated.<br />

The commission also declined with thanks an Indiana<br />

Downs invitation to step into the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

how much tracks pay for their simulcasting signals.<br />

The track has requested a rule that would<br />

have required tracks sending signals into Indiana<br />

to sell to both tracks at a “prevailing market rate.”<br />

Racing commission chairman Richard Darko said<br />

it was “too early” for regulators to interfere in that<br />

area <strong>of</strong> simulcast negotiations, but added, “We<br />

could come back to this in the future if it’s necessary.”<br />

The commission did not deny the request<br />

outright, but tabled it for future consideration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!