26.04.2014 Views

04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council

04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council

04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DRAFT<br />

made to customer services elements would be welcomed and may impact on<br />

perceptions of these services overall.<br />

Residents are also less satisfied with the financial management of the council.<br />

The budget consultation found that only 30% of residents believe that the council<br />

provides good value for money for the council tax they pay and only 17% believe<br />

that <strong>Lambeth</strong> has good financial management. Satisfaction with these measures<br />

has decreased since 2005 78 . This ties in with the picture painted by the residents’<br />

survey which shows that although <strong>Lambeth</strong> has maintained its ratings, it<br />

underperforms inner London on five of the six key measures of corporate<br />

performance - Providing good value for money for council tax paid (8 points<br />

lower), doing a good job (8 points lower), being efficient and well run (6 pints<br />

lower), making the area a better place to live (6 points lower) and doing a better<br />

job than one year ago (5 points lower).<br />

Satisfaction with the service offered by the planning service is also decreasing<br />

with satisfaction having dropped ten percentage points between 2003 and 2006.<br />

Six in ten applicants are pleased with the explanation provided for the planning<br />

decision, but 37% believe that the information provided about the progress of<br />

their application has gotten worse, and 46% believe that their application was<br />

dealt with less promptly. These aspects of customer service should be prioritised<br />

for improvement 79 .<br />

The 2007 residents’ survey shows that 61% of <strong>Lambeth</strong> residents rate local<br />

health services as good or excellent. Research conducted by <strong>Lambeth</strong> PCT<br />

about GP practices in 2006 80 shows that patients are largely satisfied with and<br />

were complimentary about reception teams, clinicians and the standard of<br />

healthcare that they receive. Patients were less satisfied with the ease of booking<br />

appointments and the length of time they have to wait in the surgery before being<br />

seen (53%), the lowest satisfaction score. Access to a doctor on the phone for<br />

advice remains an issue for many people and has the second lowest level of<br />

satisfaction at 59%. These findings suggest that, across the PCT, patients are<br />

generally less satisfied than they were in 2005, but are in line with 2004 figures.<br />

In 2008 the national survey of local health services surveyed people over the age<br />

of 16 who are registered with a GP. <strong>Lambeth</strong> is in the best scoring 20% of trusts<br />

for receiving answers from the doctor that patients could understand (scoring<br />

89/100), being kept informed about how long they would have to wait to see a<br />

doctor (34/100), receiving information regarding any potential side effects their<br />

medicine may have (76/100) and receiving copies of letters sent between their<br />

GP and a specialist (62/100). However, <strong>Lambeth</strong> is in the lowest scoring 20% of<br />

trusts for the length of time patients have to wait to see a doctor (79/100), being<br />

78 Your <strong>Lambeth</strong>, your money, your opinion. Budget consultation 2008.<br />

79 BVPI Planning Survey 2006.<br />

80 <strong>Lambeth</strong> PCT General Practice Assessment questionnaire 2006.<br />

<strong>Lambeth</strong> <strong>JSNA</strong> – Preliminary assessment<br />

Version 4<br />

October 2008<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!