04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council
04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council
04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DRAFT<br />
(12%) consider the landlord to be poor at keeping them informed. This is a slight<br />
improvement on 2004 results rising from 68% 109 .<br />
The most popular method of contacting <strong>Lambeth</strong> Housing is via the telephone and over<br />
half (52%) select this as their favoured method. This is followed by nearly four in ten<br />
(37%) who prefer contact in person at the housing office. When asked how they would<br />
like to be contacted regarding their views on decisions affecting their home, three<br />
quarters (75%) of <strong>Lambeth</strong> tenants state that they prefer to be contacted by letter. The<br />
next most popular methods of contact are telephone at 34% and by home visit at 27% 110 .<br />
Those tenants who had contacted <strong>Lambeth</strong> Housing in the 12 months prior to the survey<br />
were asked to rate various aspects of their contact. Generally staff are considered to be<br />
helpful and able to deal with problems, although nearly three in ten (29%) indicate staff<br />
were difficult to get hold of. These perceptions may well have improved as a result of the<br />
introduction of the LSC in March 2004. Tenants are less satisfied with the final outcome<br />
of their query, with half (50%) expressing satisfaction compared to nearly four in ten<br />
(38%) expressing dissatisfaction – a pattern consistent with other London Boroughs.<br />
In line with other London boroughs, just under half of all council tenants are<br />
satisfied with the opportunities for participation in decision making (49%).<br />
Tenants do think that their views are taken into account with 49% thinking<br />
<strong>Lambeth</strong> does so ‘a little’ and 25% ‘a lot.’ Improvements are needed however,<br />
with 85% of tenants believing that taking their views into account needed<br />
improvement. In terms of the avenues through which they could participate,<br />
tenants thought that the format of tenants’ meetings was acceptable, although<br />
were critical about the lack of positive outcomes. Those involved in tenants’<br />
committees or the Tenants’ <strong>Council</strong> felt that they were time consuming and<br />
unproductive 111 . Improving feedback to these groups about the outcome of their<br />
participation is therefore vital.<br />
Parents<br />
Satisfaction levels are higher for nursery and primary education within <strong>Lambeth</strong><br />
with 70% and 68% of users rating them as good or excellent respectively.<br />
Satisfaction decreases for the older education service providers with just over<br />
half satisfied with secondary education (51%) and adult education (55%) within<br />
the borough 112 . Only 22% of all residents think <strong>Lambeth</strong> secondary education is<br />
good or excellent compared to 34% across London. Positively, satisfaction with<br />
all types of education has improved since 2003 and fewer residents are<br />
concerned about education than in 200<strong>5.</strong> A focus group with parents conducted<br />
in 2005 found they were pleased with the nursery and primary schools that their<br />
children attended, but became concerned when it was time for them to transfer to<br />
secondary school. Five of the seven parents with children at primary school<br />
stated that improvement to secondary schools in the borough was their top<br />
109 STATUS Tenant Satisfaction Survey 2006.<br />
110 STATUS Tenant Satisfaction Survey. 2006<br />
111 STATUS Tenant Satisfaction Survey 2006.<br />
112 Source: TNS Social <strong>Lambeth</strong> Residents Survey 2007/08. January 2008.<br />
<strong>Lambeth</strong> <strong>JSNA</strong> – Preliminary assessment<br />
Version 4<br />
October 2008<br />
148