04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DRAFT • 83% of adult residents definitely agreed or tended to agree that people from different backgrounds get on well together in Lambeth (Residents’ survey 2007). • However, 50% of adult residents felt that “people not treating other people with respect or consideration” was a very or fairly big problem in Lambeth. • 34% of Lambeth residents perceive a “high” level of ASB within Lambeth. • The highest proportion of recorded ASB incidents were categorised as “Disregard for Community/Personal wellbeing” 57 • Main concerns relating to ASB highlighted by adults in the Residents’ survey 2007 were “parents not taking responsibility for their children” (52% rated this a very/fairly big problem), “teenagers hanging around on the streets” (50%), and “people using or dealing drugs” (50%). • Overall, 70% of adult residents of Lambeth are very or fairly satisfied with Lambeth as a place to live (Residents’ survey 2007). SIGNIFICANT INEQUALITIES IDENTIFIED • NATIONAL PRIORITIES Reference NI 1 NI 2 NI 5 NI 17 NI 22 NI 23 NI 35 Indicator % of people who believe people from different backgrounds get on well together in their local area % of people who feel that they belong to their neighbourhood Overall / general satisfaction with local area Perceptions of anti-social behaviour Perceptions of parents taking responsibility for the behaviour of their children in the area Perceptions that people in the area treat one another with respect and consideration Building resilience to violent extremism CURRENT RELEVANT STRATEGIC PRIORITIES • Support more active and respectful communities (Safer Lambeth strategic plan 2008) • Facilitate the development of an independent, borough-wide Multi-Faith Forum (Lambeth Communities First strategy 2007-10) • Work with interested parties and groups to prepare a Together as One plan (Lambeth Communities First strategy 2007-10) • Contribute to the defining and piloting of neighbourhood working in Lambeth (Lambeth Communities First strategy 2007-10) Do they enjoy informed access to a broad range of support services, personalised to their needs and abilities? STATUS • 81% of initial requests for social care support made by residents aged 18 or over are progressed through to a completed assessment within the 28 day 57 Comprising: Rowdy behaviour (shouting, swearing, fighting, drunken behaviour, hooliganism), Noise, Nuisance behaviour (including fireworks, urinating in public, arson, throwing missiles, climbing on buildings, impeding access, games in restricted/inappropriate areas, misuse of air guns, letting down tyres), Hoax calls, Animal related issues. Lambeth JSNA – Preliminary Assessment Version 4 October 2008 68
DRAFT statutory time limit (NI 132 2007/08). This is a new baseline for this information. • The care support services for 94% of residents aged 65 and over are in place within the statutory time limit of 28 days from their completed assessment (PAF D56 2007/08). This is in line with the inner London average of 94%. • 13% of carers received a specific carer’s service (PAF C62 2007/08). This is above the inner London average of 10.8% for 2006/07. • 17 care service users have their own individual support budgets through the In Control pilot scheme allowing them to seek and buy alternatives to traditional care services. • 239 people aged 18 or over received direct payments in 2007-08. This equates to 127.13 people per 100,000 population. The inner London average for 2006/07 was 115 people per 100,000 population. • The level of delayed transfers of care per 100,000 population aged 65 and over is 21.2 (PAF D41 2007/08). There is considerable variation between councils with values ranging from 4 to 55 in 2006/07. • 84% items of equipment and minor adaptations were delivered within 7 working days (PAF D54 2007/08) This falls below the inner London average of 90% for 2006/07. • 48% of users of the adult social services provision in Lambeth rate the services good/excellent and 53% of users of children/family social services rate them good/excellent (Residents’ survey 2007). • 61% of residents rate local health services good/excellent (up from 47% in 2003 and 58% in 2005) However, positive ratings are lowest among middle class residents (AB 56%, C1 54%), those who work full or part-time (56% and 55% respectively), Black Caribbean (55%), residents of Norwood (56%) and of Streatham (52%). SIGNIFICANT INEQUALITIES IDENTIFIED • NATIONAL PRIORITIES Reference Indicator NI 140 NI 132 NI 133 NI 54 NI 127 NI 128 NI 130 NI 131 NI 134 NI 103 NI 135 NI 175 Fair treatment by local services Timeliness of social care assessment (all adults) Timeliness of social care packages following assessment Services for disabled children Self reported experience of social care users User reported measure of respect and dignity in their treatment Social Care clients receiving Self Directed Support per 100,000 population Delayed transfers of care The number of emergency bed days per head of weighted population Special Educational Needs – statements issued within 26 weeks Carers receiving needs assessment or review and a specific carer’s service, or advice and information Access to services and facilities by public transport, walking and cycling CURRENT RELEVANT STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Lambeth JSNA – Preliminary Assessment Version 4 October 2008 69
Page 1 and 2:
DRAFT LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH JOI
Page 3 and 4:
DRAFT Foreword (Director of Childre
Page 5 and 6:
DRAFT 1. Introduction The concept o
Page 7 and 8:
DRAFT - Health as a way of life. -
Page 9 and 10:
DRAFT 6. End of Life Care over the
Page 11 and 12:
DRAFT Lambeth Local Area Agreement
Page 13 and 14:
DRAFT LAMBETH JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS
Page 15 and 16:
DRAFT Population - Mid Year Estimat
Page 17 and 18: DRAFT Lambeth Population Projection
Page 19 and 20: DRAFT Population Density People per
Page 21 and 22: DRAFT living in other boroughs but
Page 23 and 24: DRAFT How do they live? • There a
Page 25 and 26: DRAFT Town Centre Commn Town well t
Page 27 and 28: DRAFT How is Lambeth ranked on depr
Page 29 and 30: DRAFT People with substance misuse
Page 31 and 32: DRAFT there are approximately 1,000
Page 33 and 34: DRAFT admissions in 2007-08 over 20
Page 35 and 36: DRAFT • Trauma: falls - The morta
Page 37 and 38: DRAFT NATIONAL PRIORITIES Reference
Page 39 and 40: DRAFT GUM services • HIV/AIDS •
Page 41 and 42: DRAFT • Of the 95,726 people from
Page 43 and 44: DRAFT Overview of green spaces and
Page 45 and 46: DRAFT • The Home Office estimates
Page 47 and 48: DRAFT • Alcohol related ambulance
Page 49 and 50: DRAFT 5. Economic development - Are
Page 51 and 52: DRAFT • The business sectors with
Page 53 and 54: DRAFT • Lambeth residents are emp
Page 55 and 56: DRAFT benefit, job seekers allowanc
Page 57 and 58: DRAFT • With an average house pri
Page 59 and 60: DRAFT Safety, Parking and Enforceme
Page 61 and 62: DRAFT 6. CYP - Do they enjoy and ac
Page 63 and 64: DRAFT NI 88 NI 89 NI 90 NI 91 NI 10
Page 65 and 66: DRAFT Do the people of Lambeth part
Page 67: DRAFT Do they live in strong, cohes
Page 71 and 72: DRAFT NI 125 NI 129 NI 141 NI 142 N
Page 73 and 74: DRAFT Reference NI 4 Indicator % of
Page 75 and 76: DRAFT facilities good to excellent
Page 77 and 78: DRAFT 7. Are they safe? a. Are they
Page 79 and 80: DRAFT SIGNIFICANT INEQUALITIES IDEN
Page 81 and 82: DRAFT high crime partnership areas
Page 83 and 84: DRAFT Rowdy / Inconsiderate Behavio
Page 85 and 86: DRAFT NI 27 NI 21 NI 24 NI 25 NI 41
Page 87 and 88: DRAFT SIGNIFICANT INEQUALITIES IDEN
Page 89 and 90: DRAFT A great deal of useful feedba
Page 91 and 92: DRAFT The main finding of the consu
Page 93 and 94: DRAFT The entire review is enclosed
Page 95 and 96: DRAFT Licensing and community appro
Page 97 and 98: DRAFT keeping, use of electronic re
Page 99 and 100: DRAFT Physical activity Summary of
Page 101 and 102: DRAFT • Prisoners sometimes use n
Page 103 and 104: DRAFT 10. Lambeth priorities Priori
Page 105 and 106: DRAFT The following describes the p
Page 107 and 108: DRAFT Lambeth JSNA - Preliminary As
Page 109 and 110: DRAFT The comprehensive discussion
Page 111 and 112: DRAFT Thomas’ Charity and Marie C
Page 113 and 114: DRAFT Initiative Outcome Indicators
Page 115 and 116: DRAFT Initiative Outcome Indicators
Page 117 and 118: DRAFT 2. Proportion of eligible pop
Page 119 and 120:
DRAFT Chapter 6. Recommendations Th
Page 121 and 122:
DRAFT LAMBETH JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS
Page 123 and 124:
DRAFT Objectives: • To develop a
Page 125 and 126:
DRAFT 1. A population-based approac
Page 127 and 128:
DRAFT C22a,c D13a,b&d Core standard
Page 129 and 130:
DRAFT JSNA Steering Group membershi
Page 131 and 132:
DRAFT Project timetable with provis
Page 133 and 134:
DRAFT Appendix II Lambeth JSNA - Pr
Page 135 and 136:
DRAFT Executive Summary This litera
Page 137 and 138:
DRAFT Introduction What is the Citi
Page 139 and 140:
DRAFT Service delivery The table be
Page 141 and 142:
DRAFT treated with respect by their
Page 143 and 144:
DRAFT (25%), that their personal da
Page 145 and 146:
DRAFT are shown what has happened a
Page 147 and 148:
DRAFT Although council tenants are
Page 149 and 150:
DRAFT priority for improvement. The
Page 151 and 152:
DRAFT Other issues that the CFP sho
Page 153 and 154:
DRAFT Glossary A&E ACS AIDS BME C&Y
show all

04a JSNA Appendix , item 5. PDF 6 MB - Lambeth Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?