WHAT CHILDREN WATCH - Ofcom
WHAT CHILDREN WATCH - Ofcom
WHAT CHILDREN WATCH - Ofcom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>WHAT</strong> <strong>CHILDREN</strong> <strong>WATCH</strong><br />
AN ANALYSIS OF <strong>CHILDREN</strong>’S PROGRAMMING PROVISION<br />
BETWEEN 1997-2001, AND <strong>CHILDREN</strong>’S VIEWS<br />
Kam Atwal, Andrea Millwood-Hargrave and Jane Sancho<br />
with Leila Agyeman and Nicki Karet<br />
June 2003
<strong>WHAT</strong> <strong>CHILDREN</strong> <strong>WATCH</strong><br />
AN ANALYSIS OF <strong>CHILDREN</strong>’S PROGRAMMING PROVISION<br />
BETWEEN 1997-2001, AND <strong>CHILDREN</strong>’S VIEWS<br />
Kam Atwal, Andrea Millwood-Hargrave and Jane Sancho<br />
with Leila Agyeman and Nicki Karet<br />
Broadcasting Standards Commission<br />
Independent Television Commission<br />
June 2003
Contents<br />
Executive summary 1<br />
Introduction 5<br />
Section I:<br />
1 Quantitative Analysis of Children’s Programming<br />
Provision: 1996-2001 7<br />
2 Changing Landscape 9<br />
3 Time Measures 11<br />
4 Daypart Analysis 15<br />
5 Diversity in Programme Provision 23<br />
6 Genre Analysis 25<br />
7 Genre Analysis by Channel 35<br />
8 Children’s Viewing Habits 55<br />
9 New Media 63<br />
10 Changes since the 1997 Study 65<br />
Section II:<br />
Background 69<br />
11 The Role of Television 71<br />
12 When, Where and How are Children Watching? 75<br />
13 Children’s Understanding of Television 83<br />
14 Terrestrial versus Multichannel 91<br />
15 Conclusions 99<br />
Appendix I: Methodology 101<br />
Appendix II: Sample 102<br />
Appendix III: Broadcasting Standards Commission 103<br />
Appendix IV: Independent Television Commission 104
Executive Summary<br />
1. Households with children living in them contain a wider range of in-home<br />
entertainment than childfree households and are more likely to be ‘early adopters’<br />
of such equipment.<br />
2. Children in multichannel homes watch significantly more television per day than their<br />
terrestrial only counterparts (an average of 35 minutes more per day at 2 hours and<br />
27 minutes). However, the amount of time they spend specifically viewing ‘children’s<br />
programmes’ is comparable with those living in analogue terrestrial-only homes<br />
[Source: BARB].<br />
3. There has been a dramatic rise in the amount of children’s programming on analogue<br />
terrestrial and other television services over the past five years.<br />
4. The increase has come about principally from the launch of the new analogue terrestrial<br />
service Five (formerly operating as Channel 5), as well as the introduction of dedicated<br />
satellite and cable-delivered channels. (The detailed analyses do not include the free-toair<br />
dedicated children’s channels, CBBC and CBeebies, launched after the analysis period<br />
in February 2002, increasing provision still further.)<br />
5. Children are able now to tune in to children’s programmes on the dedicated channels at<br />
any time of day. The replay channels which offer rolling schedules, available in<br />
multichannel homes, mean that children in these homes need not worry about missing<br />
their favourite programmes, as they will be repeated.<br />
6. Despite this growth in provision, the range being offered to children, as a proportion of<br />
the time devoted to children’s programming, is variable on different services. In this<br />
context, analogue terrestrial channels offer the most diverse line-up with regard to the<br />
balance of different types of programming e.g. factual, drama, light entertainment,<br />
animation and pre-school, broadcast on a single channel.<br />
7. This being said, the mainstay of the analogue terrestrial channels is animation, as it is<br />
for the dedicated children’s channels. The analyses do not distinguish between types of<br />
animation and, not surprisingly, this is the genre which most children are watching<br />
within children’s programming. In multichannel homes, more than half the time spent<br />
viewing children’s programmes is devoted to this genre.<br />
8. The result of this dramatic increase in animation is a move away, by children in<br />
multichannel homes in particular, from the drama and factual genres in children’s<br />
programming.<br />
9. The provision of drama on the analogue terrestrial channels is more stable than some of<br />
the other genres, with little significant change across the period sampled. On the<br />
dedicated channels, however, there was a steep decline in drama in 2001.<br />
What Children Watch 1
10. Factual programming is almost absent from the dedicated channels and is the genre<br />
most obviously in decline on the analogue channels. The classification system used by<br />
the industry means that some schools programming is classified as ‘factual’, which<br />
boosts the minutage ascribed to this genre. The picture would be even worse, therefore,<br />
if schools programming were removed from the analysis.<br />
11. Light entertainment programming takes a significant proportion of the share of<br />
children’s programming on many channels, and had grown significantly across the<br />
sample period on some of the dedicated channels.<br />
12. Pre-school programme provision was significant within the basket of dedicated<br />
channels as they split to form new services, focused on particular age groups. Provision<br />
of this genre had increased also on the analogue terrestrial channels.<br />
13. Much of the increase in children’s programme provision on the analogue terrestrial<br />
channels is centred on the breakfast slot, while after-school provision remains constant.<br />
14. Children are spending significant amounts of their viewing time per day watching genres<br />
other than those targeted at children. These other genres are not analysed in this report,<br />
which concentrates on children’s programming provision.<br />
15. Interviews with children underscore many of these findings. Television is of significant<br />
importance in their lives. It is pervasive - most homes have more than one television set,<br />
and many of the children interviewed have a set in their bedrooms.<br />
16. With 59% penetration of multichannel television in homes with children, many of the<br />
children in the sample who live in analogue terrestrial-only homes have been exposed to<br />
the other channels and services as well and therefore have some knowledge of them.<br />
17. Television is a prime source of entertainment, if not a preferred activity. The children<br />
interviewed watch at all times; very often the television is on, even if not actively attended to.<br />
18. Children under the age of eight are confused about what is a programme and what is<br />
a channel, especially those in multichannel homes who are switching between so many<br />
more channels and programmes.<br />
19. Those in analogue terrestrial-only homes have more awareness of the times their<br />
favourite programmes are on and what channel they are on, simply because they follow<br />
a linear programme schedule and there is a limited choice of channels. Those with access<br />
to the dedicated channels have many more channels to choose from. They tend to know<br />
which channels their favourite programmes are on, but otherwise have less awareness of<br />
which channel they are watching and flick around more often. They use the electronic<br />
programme guide to navigate their way around and ‘create’ their own schedules.<br />
2<br />
What Children Watch
20. Children in multichannel homes are more demanding of their television schedules,<br />
expecting a large number of different programmes, constantly changing. The research<br />
does not suggest that multichannel children are calling for greater diversity in the type of<br />
content they watch, but this may be a reflection of the fact that they are accustomed to<br />
the range of material they are offered.<br />
21. The issue of programme origination was raised with children, but was not found to<br />
be of significant interest, although many of the children spoke of their enjoyment of<br />
programmes produced in the United States. (The quantitative, BARB-based analysis does<br />
not distinguish country of origin.)<br />
22. Parents, especially parents in analogue terrestrial-only homes, are particularly keen that<br />
UK-originated programming should be available for their children to watch. They feel it<br />
is more authentic and culturally relevant and some felt that it had more of an<br />
educational value.<br />
23. The level of parental knowledge about the material being watched is mixed. While<br />
parents voice concerns, many admit that they police the viewing of their secondary<br />
school-age children less than their younger children.<br />
24. Parents expressed concern about certain aspects of taste and decency when talking about<br />
children’s programming. When talking about programming in general, and not<br />
programming targeted specifically at children, the use of swearing and offensive<br />
language was particularly disliked.<br />
25. Parents felt it was important to retain children’s programme provision on the analogue<br />
terrestrial channels, despite the alternative sources available on cable and satellite<br />
channels. They considered it essential that terrestrial broadcasters catered for the<br />
child audience.<br />
26. Analogue terrestrial parents, in particular, felt that the terrestrial channels offered a better<br />
range of children’s genres which included quality British made programmes.<br />
Additionally, parents who had not chosen to subscribe to satellite or cable channels said<br />
they would resent being forced to pay for additional services in order for their children<br />
to have something to watch.<br />
27. However, there was an acceptance that multichannel television opportunities were part<br />
of the television environment and that it was incumbent on broadcasters to continue to<br />
create programming that captured the attention and fed the demands of the child<br />
audience.<br />
What Children Watch 3
4<br />
What Children Watch
Introduction<br />
Programming for children on television continues to increase. This report updates the survey<br />
last undertaken five years ago, which covered the period from 1992-1996. 1 This study,<br />
which considers the five years since then, from 1997-2001, shows that the amount of<br />
children’s programming available (as defined by the industry measurement system, BARB)<br />
has tripled. Some of this has come about because of the launch - during that period - of an<br />
analogue, free to air, terrestrial television channel (Five) and some of the change has been<br />
due to the introduction of new satellite or cable delivered channels. In 2002, two further<br />
dedicated channels were introduced, CBBC and CBeebies, available as free-to-air digital<br />
services. The detailed quantitative analysis only presents limited data on these channels,<br />
however, as they were launched after the sample period.<br />
Within the five years under consideration (to 2001), the television landscape has also<br />
changed. Digital services, satellite, cable and terrestrial, have been introduced and DVDs are<br />
taking the pre-recorded content market by storm. As has been found over many years, it is<br />
within homes with children that the newest forms of in-home entertainment are most<br />
quickly adopted.<br />
The sheer volume of targeted children’s programming available means that there is a wide<br />
range of programme types available. However, the data also show, as did the report which<br />
ran from 1992-1996, that the proportions of diverse content are restricted. While a<br />
significant proportion of the material is animation-based, the terrestrial analogue television<br />
channels still provide a more diverse programme line-up, with regard to the balance of<br />
programme types, than the dedicated services available to multichannel homes. This, in<br />
turn, affects the type of material children in multichannel homes are watching in<br />
comparison with children in analogue terrestrial-only homes. The data also show that<br />
children in multichannel homes watch approximately 35 more minutes of television per day<br />
than those in homes without access to additional broadcast channels.<br />
The previous report, by Professor Messenger Davies, had included a series of interviews<br />
with professionals and those interested in children’s programming provision. At that time,<br />
the research had shown the genre to be under pressure, especially as channels competed for<br />
audiences in what were often seen to be lucrative (within commercial television channels)<br />
time slots. Certain programme categories were felt to be at risk and there was general<br />
pessimism, especially among the traditional broadcasting community, about the<br />
continuation of children’s programming. Those interviewed who came from the emerging<br />
satellite and cable industries were far less pessimistic. This study will examine, through the<br />
analysis of programme provision, whether the pessimism or optimism was justified.<br />
However, it also takes on board one of Professor Messenger Davies’s key calls, which was<br />
for children’s opinions to be heard. The study included interviews and discussions with<br />
children aged 6 to 12, asking them about their viewing habits and the importance of<br />
children’s programming in their lives, while also seeking parents’ views about children’s<br />
programme provision.<br />
1 Messenger Davies, M, and Corbett, B., The Provision of Children’s Television in Britain: 1992-1996; Broadcasting Standards<br />
Commission, 1997.<br />
What Children Watch 5
6<br />
What Children Watch
Section 1<br />
1 Quantitative analysis of children’s<br />
programming provision: 1996-2001<br />
The quantitative component of this research is based on statistics from the BARB industry<br />
panel. The analysis builds on the findings of the 1997 report The Provision of Children’s<br />
Television in Britain: 1992-1996 published by the Broadcasting Standards Commission and<br />
is split into four elements:<br />
■<br />
Analysis of programming provision by daypart - looking at trends in children’s output<br />
across the terrestrial channels throughout the day.<br />
■<br />
The breakdown of provision by programme genre - this section looks at the total time,<br />
in hours, devoted to each genre by channel, investigating any changes in total provision<br />
as well as the role of each of the channels in providing relevant programming.<br />
■<br />
Genre analysis by channel - analysis of the proportion of children’s broadcasting<br />
hours dedicated to each genre by channel between 1996-2001, illustrating the mix of<br />
programming across the terrestrial and dedicated children’s channels.<br />
■<br />
Analysis of children’s viewing habits, in general, and to children’s programming<br />
in particular<br />
Methodological issues<br />
The objective of this study is to highlight the current trends and the changes seen in the provision<br />
of children’s television in the five years from, and including, 1996 (the period of time since the<br />
previous report) to 2001. The analysis is based on genre classifications defined by BARB for<br />
children’s programmes. The advantage of using universally recognised industry data such as<br />
BARB is that it facilitates any future comparisons of trends. The genre categories used are:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
children’s drama<br />
children’s factual<br />
children’s animation<br />
children’s light entertainment<br />
children’s pre-school<br />
There are some drawbacks, however, to using the BARB genre classifications for children’s<br />
programming. For example, some shows targeted at young viewers, either within dedicated<br />
slots or on children’s cable and satellite channels, are not classified as such. For example, the<br />
US-originated comedy show Boy Meets World has been classified as ‘light entertainment -<br />
sitcom US’ rather than ‘children’s light entertainment’. By including ‘light entertainment -<br />
sitcom US’ in the analysis, the figures would be distorted by the inclusion of those<br />
programmes within the genre which are not specifically targeted at children. This means<br />
that a number of programmes targeted at and of appeal to younger viewers may be<br />
excluded from this study.<br />
What Children Watch 7
Since the Messenger Davies study which looked at the five years leading up to 1996, easier<br />
access to computerised data has meant that a broader analysis of trends in the provision of<br />
children’s programming can be conducted. Whereas that study was based on an analysis of<br />
four sample weeks (first week of February, May, August and November) for each year<br />
between 1992-1996, this analysis is based on data for the whole year from 1996 to 2001.<br />
Like the 1997 study, time is the measure used to look at children’s programming provision<br />
on each channel, and within each of the five genres considered.<br />
As the data for the current study are driven entirely by the BARB analyses, data showing<br />
origination of programming are not available. In the 1997 study, as only a sample of<br />
programmes was taken for each year, each programme was analysed individually for<br />
country of origin.<br />
The similarities and differences between the two studies have been summarised below:<br />
Data source<br />
Period of analysis<br />
The Provision of Children’s<br />
Television in Britain: 1992-1996<br />
BARB<br />
4 sample weeks (first week of<br />
February, May, August and<br />
November) for each year between<br />
1992-1996<br />
What Children Watch,<br />
2003<br />
BARB<br />
Whole year data 1996-2001<br />
Measure<br />
■<br />
Time<br />
■<br />
Time<br />
■<br />
Access to extra information on<br />
source and origin of<br />
programmes and details of first<br />
or repeat showing<br />
Genre classifications<br />
BARB classifications:<br />
■ Children’s Drama<br />
■ Children’s Factual - excludes<br />
Schools programming<br />
■ Children’s Animation<br />
■ Children’s Light Entertainment<br />
■ Children’s Pre-school<br />
BARB classifications:<br />
■ Children’s Drama<br />
■ Children’s Factual - including<br />
Schools programming<br />
■ Children’s Animation<br />
■ Children’s Light Entertainment<br />
■ Children’s Pre-school<br />
Channel coverage<br />
■<br />
BBC1, BBC2, ITV1 (including<br />
■<br />
BBC1, BBC2, GMTV, ITV1,<br />
TVAM/GMTV),Channel 4<br />
Channel 4, Five<br />
■<br />
The Cartoon Network<br />
■<br />
Boomerang<br />
■<br />
The Disney Channel<br />
■<br />
The Cartoon Network<br />
■<br />
Nickelodeon<br />
■<br />
The Disney Channel, Playhouse<br />
■<br />
Sky One<br />
Disney, Toon Disney<br />
■<br />
The Children’s Channel<br />
■<br />
Fox Kids<br />
■<br />
Nickelodeon, Nick Jr<br />
■<br />
The Children’s Channel<br />
8<br />
What Children Watch<br />
■<br />
Trouble
2 Changing landscape<br />
In-home entertainment provision<br />
The television viewing landscape has changed dramatically over recent years - a significant<br />
part of this has been as a result of the way in which younger viewers are consuming media.<br />
As the results of the report published by the ITC and BSC, The Public’s View 2002<br />
highlight, there are striking differences in the ownership of home entertainment between<br />
people in homes with and without children. 2<br />
Home entertainment in households<br />
With Children<br />
Without Children<br />
% %<br />
Video recorder 92 85<br />
Teletext 88 81<br />
Multichannel 59 46<br />
NICAM stereo television 49 44<br />
Video games 54 20<br />
Personal computer 54 42<br />
Video camera 35 20<br />
Computer with internet 49 39<br />
Widescreen television 31 24<br />
Computer with television/video 16 10<br />
Source: The Public’s View 2002. Base: All respondents<br />
Those homes with children tend to have a wider range of new technologies in the home.<br />
Two-thirds (59%) of people with children have access to multichannel television, while only<br />
46% without children have it. Similarly, 49% of households with children have Internet<br />
access in the home, compared with 39% of those without children. The presence of such a<br />
wide range of home entertainment equipment in the home is undoubtedly changing the way<br />
in which young viewers spend their leisure-time and, therefore, the ways in which they<br />
watch television.<br />
Equipment in eldest child's bedroom<br />
Age of Children<br />
Total 0 - 3 4 - 9 10 -15<br />
% % % %<br />
Television 57 33 58 79<br />
Radio 48 21 49 69<br />
Games console 28 16 27 42<br />
Video cassette recorder 32 18 31 46<br />
Computer 12 2 12 19<br />
Satellite/cable 6 1 4 11<br />
Computer with internet 3 2 4 5<br />
Source: The Public’s View 2002. Base: All respondents with children<br />
2 Television: The Public’s View 2002; Independent Television Commission and Broadcasting Standards Commission, 2003.<br />
What Children Watch 9
The Public’s View also looks at the equipment in the eldest child’s bedroom. The majority of<br />
children (57%) have a television set in their bedrooms, rising to 79% of those aged 10-15.<br />
Some of the most surprising figures are those for young children, aged four to nine,<br />
of whom 58% had a television, 49% a radio, 27% a games console and 31% a VCR.<br />
10<br />
What Children Watch
3 Children’s programme provision:<br />
time measures<br />
Terrestrial television<br />
Total hours of children’s programming on terrestrial networks<br />
Hours<br />
5,000<br />
4,500<br />
4,000<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 3,494 3,986 4,566 4,449 4,524 4,657<br />
■ GMTV ■ Five ■ C4 ■ ITV1 ■ BBC2 ■ BBC1<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ The overall provision of children’s television across the terrestrial networks has<br />
changed significantly between 1996-2001, with total output increasing by 33% from<br />
3,494 hours to 4,657 hours as a result of the launch of Channel 5 (now Five) and an<br />
increase in time devoted to children on BBC2.<br />
■ Between 1996-1999, skewed by its provision of dedicated schools programming<br />
in the early morning (included, in this analysis, within the children’s factual genre),<br />
Channel 4 was the main provider of children’s programmes.<br />
■ Over this time, BBC2’s role became increasingly significant, overtaking Channel 4<br />
in 2000.<br />
■ BBC1 has steadily increased the number of hours devoted to children since 1997,<br />
making it the second largest supplier of children’s programming, while ITV1’s provision<br />
has fluctuated over the years between a low of 386 hours in 1998 and a high of 448<br />
in 2000.<br />
■ As a result of growing output during breakfast time, GMTV has been facing<br />
increasing competition over the years.<br />
What Children Watch 11
Dedicated channels<br />
The impact of non-terrestrial channels on children’s viewing has been investigated in detail<br />
in this report by examining trends across the following channels (dates indicate month from<br />
which BARB data became available):<br />
■ Boomerang (May 2000)<br />
■ Cartoon Network (November 1996)<br />
■ Disney Channel (October 1995)<br />
■ Playhouse Disney (September 2000)<br />
■ Toon Disney (September 2000)<br />
■ Fox Kids (October 1996)<br />
■ Nickelodeon (September 1993)<br />
■ Nick Jr (September 1999)<br />
■ TCC (January 1993-April 1998)<br />
■ Trouble (September 1998)<br />
Total hours of children’s programming on dedicated channels<br />
Hours<br />
35,000<br />
30,000<br />
25,000<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5000<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 10,236 17,093 15,833 16,334 25,985 32,531<br />
■ Boomerang ■ TCC ■ Playhouse Disney ■ Toon Disney ■ Fox Kids ■ Disney Channel ■ Cartoon Network<br />
■ Nick Jr ■ Nickelodeon ■ Trouble<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
12<br />
What Children Watch
It is important to note that since this study is principally interested in the diversity of<br />
programming available to children, in the multichannel homes analysis we concentrate on<br />
the main channels such as Nickelodeon and Fox Kids and exclude the replay channels.<br />
■ Overall provision has tripled from 10,236 hours in 1996 to 32,531 hours in 2001.<br />
■ Between 1996 and 1997, following the launch of The Cartoon Network, output<br />
increased by 67% to 17,093 hours.<br />
■ With the closure of TCC in 1998 and the launch of Trouble a few months later, total<br />
hours of children’s programming remained fairly constant between 1997-1999.<br />
■ 2000 saw the launch of a number of new channels including Boomerang and the Disney<br />
spin-off channels, Toon Disney and Playhouse Disney, resulting in a 59% rise in<br />
dedicated children’s entertainment. This trend followed through to 2001, the first full<br />
year of transmission for many of the new channels.<br />
■ Since then, two further dedicated channels have been launched as free to air services,<br />
CBBC and CBeebies. These became operational in 2002, after the sample period and so<br />
only limited analyses of their performance are included here.<br />
What Children Watch 13
14<br />
What Children Watch
4 Children’s programme provision:<br />
daypart analysis<br />
Tracking the amount of time dedicated to children’s programming across the five main<br />
networks provides an overview of the changes that have occurred between 1996-2001. In<br />
order to understand these trends in more detail data have been split into the following time<br />
slots:<br />
■ Breakfast (0600-0929)<br />
■ Morning (0930-1159)<br />
■ Early afternoon (1200-1529)<br />
■ After-school (1530-1729)<br />
Although some children’s programming is scheduled after 1730, in line with the 1997 study<br />
this time slot has been excluded, although the ‘total’ figure includes all programming<br />
throughout the day.<br />
Terrestrial television<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: total terrestrial<br />
Hours<br />
5,000<br />
4,500<br />
4,000<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 3,494 3,986 4,566 4,449 4,524 4,657<br />
■ 1530-1729 ■ 1200-1529 ■ 0930-1159 ■ 0600-0929<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
What Children Watch 15
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
As noted, the total hours dedicated to children’s programming across the five terrestrial<br />
channels have increased from 3,494 in 1996 to 4,657 in 2001, an increase of 33%. As<br />
well as increased provision on BBC channels, this trend is associated with the launch of<br />
Five in 1997.<br />
The most significant change has been the rise in breakfast-time programming, making it<br />
by far the most important daypart for children’s entertainment. There has been an<br />
increase of 121% in provision at this time over the five-year period being considered.<br />
There has been a commensurate fall during the 1200-1529 slot, accelerated by<br />
Channel 4 and Five cutting provision during this time segment.<br />
Overall provision during the 0930-1159 and 1530-1729 slots has remained consistent<br />
over the past six years (with BBC1 and ITV1 continuing to be the main providers at this<br />
time of day).<br />
It should be noted that the children’s programming slot in the afternoon on BBC1 is<br />
longer than that on ITV1, although the difference has varied.<br />
BBC1<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: BBC1<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 832 767 795 858 870 889<br />
■ 1530-1729 ■ 1200-1529 ■ 0930-1159 ■ 0600-0929<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
16<br />
What Children Watch
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Since 1996, the total amount of children’s programming on BBC1 has increased<br />
by 7% from 832 hours to 889 hours in 2001, following a dip in 1997. This overall<br />
figure hides a much larger increase (64%) in programming during the breakfast slot<br />
from 206 hours in 1996 to 338 hours in 2001.<br />
The after-school slot remains the most dominant for BBC1- time devoted to children<br />
during this part of the day rose by 22% from 344 hours in 1996 to 420 hours the<br />
following year, remaining fairly consistent between 1997-2001 (416 hours).<br />
However, over this time, output during the morning and early afternoon dayparts<br />
declined. Provision during the 0930-1159 slot fell from 178 hours in 1996 to 64 hours<br />
in 2001 - a decrease of 64%. Output during 1200-1529 fell by 26% from 92 hours in<br />
1996 to 68 hours in 2001.<br />
BBC2<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: BBC2<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 923 930 1,042 1,059 1,183 1,292<br />
■ 1530-1729 ■ 1200-1529 ■ 0930-1159 ■ 0600-0929<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
BBC2’s provision of children’s programming has increased steadily each year from<br />
923 hours in 1996 to 1,292 hours in 2001, and it is now the largest single provider of<br />
children’s programming amongst the terrestrial channels.<br />
Similar to trends observed on BBC1, there has been significant growth in time<br />
devoted to children during the breakfast slot, with the extension of the weekday slot<br />
from 0730-0830 to 0700-0900 in 1999.<br />
Overall, between 1996-2001, children’s programming provision during the<br />
0600-1159 slot has risen from 727 hours to 1,156 hours, an increase of 59%.<br />
What Children Watch 17
ITV1<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: ITV1<br />
Hours<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 460 409 386 406 448 430<br />
■ 1530-1729 ■ 1200-1529 ■ 0930-1159<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
There was a high of 460 hours of children’s programming on ITV1 in 1996, which<br />
declined marginally to 430 hours in 2001.<br />
Provision during the morning slot (0930-1159) more than halved from 105 hours in<br />
1996 to 42 hours in 2001. Over the same period, output during the early afternoon slot<br />
(1200-1529) increased as the start of the after-school slot moved from 1530 to<br />
1525 in 1999 and then 1520 in 2000, allowing for more programming targeted at<br />
the very young.<br />
18<br />
What Children Watch
GMTV 3<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: GMTV<br />
Hours<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 280 320 352 348 386 366<br />
■ 0600-0929<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
As with BBC1 and BBC2, children’s programming during the GMTV slot at breakfast<br />
time increased by 38% from 280 hours in 1996 to 386 hours in 2000, although the rise<br />
has been less dramatic than that seen on the BBC channel and has now fallen back<br />
slightly to 366 hours in 2001.<br />
3 GMTV was not considered separately from ITV11 in the 1997 study.<br />
What Children Watch 19
Channel 4<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: Channel 4<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 1,000 1,008 1,141 1,066 956 835<br />
■ 1530-1729 ■ 1200-1529 ■ 0930-1159 ■ 0600-0929<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
With the disappearance of programming in the afternoon, the total amount of time<br />
devoted to children on Channel 4 has declined from a peak of 1,141 hours in 1998 to<br />
835 hours in 2001.<br />
Back in 1996, the 0930-1159 slot was the predominant daypart for children’s<br />
programmes on Channel 4, providing a long list of factual programming as part of the<br />
schools programme output (4 Learning). However, since 1997 and the increase in time<br />
dedicated to children’s programming between 0600 and 0929 which is associated with<br />
the scheduling of programmes such as Sesame Street, this daypart has become the<br />
mainstay of children’s entertainment on Channel 4.<br />
20<br />
What Children Watch
Five (formerly Channel 5)<br />
Hours of children’s programming by daypart: Five<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 552 850 712 682 845<br />
■ 1530-1729 ■ 1200-1529 ■ 0930-1159 ■ 0600-0929<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ Since its first full year of transmission, Five’s provision of children’s programming has<br />
declined from a high of 850 hours in 1998 to 682 hours in 2000, picking up again in<br />
2001 (845 hours).<br />
■ Much of the fall between 1998-2000 was as a result of a decline in dedicated children’s<br />
programming from 0930-1529, whereas provision during breakfast time has been on<br />
an upward trend, peaking at 728 hours in 2001.<br />
■ Accounting for a small proportion of total hours, programming during the 1530-1729<br />
slot amounted to 29 hours in 1999, rising to 37 hours in 2001, as a result of the<br />
introduction of children’s programming on weekend afternoons.<br />
What Children Watch 21
13 18 30 15 25<br />
9 1 76 7 6<br />
22<br />
What Children Watch
5 Diversity in programme provision<br />
An analysis of trends in children’s programme provision across the entire television<br />
environment shows that the main increase in targeted children’s material is driven by<br />
animation. Drama, on the other hand, has decreased to the level it was at the start of the<br />
sample period while the other genres have remained stable.<br />
Total hours devoted to children’s programming: 1996-2001<br />
Hours<br />
40,000<br />
35,000<br />
30,000<br />
25,000<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 13,729 21,059 20,350 20,751 30,502 37,183<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
Sum of children’s output on terrestrial networks and dedicated children’s channels<br />
■<br />
Closer analysis of the range of children’s programming available on the main networks<br />
and the dedicated channels in 2001 as a proportion of total time devoted to this<br />
audience, further illustrates the difference in choice made available to those in terrestrial<br />
households and those in multichannel homes.<br />
Diversity in children’s programming: 2001<br />
Terrestrial networks<br />
Dedicated channels<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
What Children Watch 23
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Although animation programming dominates in both cases, 4 the main networks provide<br />
greater diversity of programme types in the more restricted amount of broadcast time.<br />
Drama accounts for 13% of the output on the terrestrial channels and 9% on the<br />
dedicated channels.<br />
18% of the output from the terrestrial channels consists of factual material compared<br />
with only 1% of the total output on the dedicated channels; however it must be borne in<br />
mind that the factual genre within BARB includes schools programming.<br />
Light entertainment programming represents 15% of the total time provided for<br />
children’s programmes on terrestrial television, while accounting for 7% of the<br />
dedicated line-up.<br />
The very young are also well catered for on the terrestrial channels with a quarter<br />
of the output devoted to pre-school programming compared with 6% across the<br />
dedicated channels.<br />
As mentioned, some schools programming on BBC2 and Channel 4 is classified by<br />
BARB under the children’s factual category - some will be classified under one of the<br />
various documentaries sub-genres. The data available are not able to offer a finer<br />
analysis, but the figures below indicate the amount (in hours) of schools programming<br />
output on Channel 4 and BBC2 since 1996.<br />
Channel 4 Schools Programming<br />
Hours/Annum<br />
1996 356<br />
1997 457<br />
1998 420<br />
1999 419<br />
2000 399<br />
2001 565<br />
Source: ITC<br />
BBC2 Schools Programming Genre Hours/Annum<br />
1996-1997 Schools (Network) 561<br />
1997-1998 Schools (Network) 435<br />
1998-1999 Schools (Network) 432<br />
1999-2000 Schools (Network) 417<br />
2000-2001 Education for children 892<br />
2001-2002 Education for children 678<br />
Source: BBC Annual Reports<br />
4 The analysis is not able to distinguish within genres by looking at, for example, types of animation.<br />
24<br />
What Children Watch
6 Genre analysis<br />
Analysis of the breakdown of provision by genre provides insight into the diversity of<br />
children’s programming. This section looks at the total time, in hours, devoted to each genre<br />
by channel, illustrating whether there have been significant changes in total provision, as<br />
well as the role of each of the channels in providing relevant programming.<br />
Terrestrial television<br />
Children’s drama<br />
Hours devoted to children’s drama on terrestrial channels<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 429 485 569 620 595 586<br />
■ GMTV ■ Five ■ C4 ■ ITV1 ■ BBC2 ■ BBC1<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Total drama provision across the main networks peaked at 620 hours in 1999, falling<br />
to 586 hours in 2001. Since its launch, Five has played a key role in providing this type<br />
of programming and, along with BBC1, contributed significantly to this peak. BBC2 has<br />
also increased output, whereas ITV1’s provision has remained consistent at an average<br />
of 109 hours per year.<br />
What Children Watch 25
Children’s factual (including schools programmes)<br />
Hours devoted to children’s factual on terrestrial channels<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 817 860 839 914 956 848<br />
■ GMTV ■ Five ■ C4 ■ ITV1 ■ BBC2 ■ BBC1<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ Factual programming, as captured within BARB analyses, includes schools<br />
programming, available primarily on Channel 4 and BBC2. Due to this fact, the total<br />
hours devoted to factual material (including schools programming on Channel 4)<br />
increased steadily from 839 hours in 1998 to 956 hours in 2000.<br />
■ BBC2 is the second largest provider of factual programming, a genre which includes a<br />
mixture of schools and other factual programming. BBC2 dedicated 306 hours of its<br />
2001 schedule to the genre.<br />
■ ITV1’s provision in this genre, while low, has stabilised 5 .<br />
5 Since 2002, the ITC has agreed annual minimum requirements with ITV1 for originated material, including children’s factual (52<br />
hours per annum).<br />
26<br />
What Children Watch
Children’s animation<br />
Hours devoted to children’s animation on terrestrial channels<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 1,252 985 1,108 1,201 1,280 1,381<br />
■ GMTV ■ Five ■ C4 ■ ITV1 ■ BBC2 ■ BBC1<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ Back in 1996, the provision of animation was more equally distributed between the<br />
channels than any other genre, but since then there have been significant changes in<br />
supply. Following sharp falls in output from BBC1 and Channel 4, the total number of<br />
hours of animation fell from 1,252 (1996) to 985 hours in 1997.<br />
■ Between 1997-2000, BBC1’s animation output continued to decline from 251 to 210<br />
hours, picking up again in 2001 to 252 hours.<br />
■ Over the same period, ITV1’s supply has remained fairly consistent. As BBC2 has<br />
strengthened its position as the key terrestrial provider of children’s television, so has its<br />
role as the supplier of animation expanded, with output increasing from 253 hours in<br />
1997 to 437 hours in 2001.<br />
■ Although it was the move away from animation on BBC1 that led to the fall in<br />
provision across the terrestrial networks in 1997, the total hours devoted to this genre<br />
on BBC channels (1 and 2) increased marginally from 682 hours in 1996 to 689 hours<br />
in 2001.<br />
■ Animated output on GMTV increased from 91 hours in 1997 to a high of 170 in<br />
2000 - a rise of 87%, falling back in 2001 to 127 hours (a decrease of 25%).<br />
What Children Watch 27
Children’s light entertainment<br />
Hours devoted to children’s light entertainment on terrestrial channels<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 460 733 748 599 644 678<br />
■ GMTV ■ Five ■ C4 ■ ITV1 ■ BBC2 ■ BBC1<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ Time devoted to children’s light entertainment peaked at 748 hours in 1998.<br />
■ BBC1’s provision steadily increased between 1996-2001 from 130 hours to 233 hours –<br />
over the same period BBC2’s role weakened.<br />
■ GMTV has consistently been a principal provider of this programming, with 196 hours<br />
dedicated to the genre in 2001.<br />
■ ITV1’s supply has remained stable over time with between 40-55 hours of light<br />
entertainment output.<br />
■ During its first two years Five showed on average 190 hours per year of comedy<br />
programmes, games shows etc. targeted at children, but since then has cut output to<br />
89 hours (2001).<br />
28<br />
What Children Watch
Pre-school<br />
Hours devoted to children’s pre-school on terrestrial channels<br />
Hours<br />
1,400<br />
1,200<br />
1,000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 535 904 1,253 1,084 1,043 1,158<br />
■ GMTV ■ Five ■ C4 ■ ITV1 ■ BBC2 ■ BBC1<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
As a result of increased supply from BBC2, Channel 4 and Five, the total hours of preschool<br />
programming on terrestrial channels more than doubled from 535 hours in 1996<br />
to 1,253 hours in 1998. This peak was followed by a dip between 1999-2000, and<br />
increased supply on BBC2 and Five again led to a rise in pre-school programming<br />
in 2001.<br />
What Children Watch 29
Dedicated channels<br />
The 1997 BSC study did not include analysis of the output by genre across the<br />
numerous non-terrestrial channels dedicated to children’s programming. The growth in<br />
the impact of these channels on viewing habits has meant this should now be a key<br />
component of our study.<br />
Children’s Drama<br />
Total hours of children’s drama on children’s channels<br />
Hours<br />
4,500<br />
4,000<br />
3,500<br />
3,000<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 2,133 1,928 2,872 3,911 4,329 3,061<br />
■ Boomerang ■ TCC ■ Playhouse Disney ■ Toon Disney ■ Fox Kids ■ Disney Channel ■ Cartoon Network<br />
■ Nick Jr ■ Nickelodeon ■ Trouble<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Between 1996-2000, the total provision of drama programming on non-terrestrial<br />
channels doubled, from 2,133 to 4,329 hours as a result of increased supply from established<br />
channels such as Nickelodeon, the Disney Channel and Fox Kids, as well as Trouble,<br />
launched in 1998. However, in 2001, drama output was slashed, falling to 3,061 hours<br />
(a decrease of 29%) as each of the dominant players moved away from this genre.<br />
30<br />
What Children Watch
Children’s factual<br />
Total hours of children’s factual on children’s channels<br />
Hours<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 106 283 109 265 339 398<br />
■ Boomerang ■ TCC ■ Playhouse Disney ■ Toon Disney ■ Fox Kids ■ Disney Channel ■ Cartoon Network<br />
■ Nick Jr ■ Nickelodeon ■ Trouble<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
The Children’s Channel played a major role in the provision of factual programming on<br />
non-terrestrial channels, broadcasting 273 hours in 1997 - however, the majority of this<br />
was accounted for by only one programme, Art Attack.<br />
Although there has been an upward trend in the time devoted to factual programming,<br />
total output across the children’s channels in 2001 amounted to 398 hours. The Disney<br />
Channel is now the most significant, supplying three-quarters of the output.<br />
What Children Watch 31
Children’s animation<br />
Total hours of children’s animation on children’s channels<br />
Hours<br />
30,000<br />
25,000<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 6,339 13,013 11,324 10,326 18,258 24,679<br />
■ Boomerang ■ TCC ■ Playhouse Disney ■ Toon Disney ■ Fox Kids ■ Disney Channel ■ Cartoon Network<br />
■ Nick Jr ■ Nickelodeon ■ Trouble<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Over the past six years, the amount of animation shown across the dedicated channels has<br />
quadrupled from 6,339 hours to 24,679 hours, with all channels except Trouble<br />
screening these programmes. The first significant jump in the provision of animation<br />
was seen in 1997 in this analysis and was associated with the launch of Cartoon<br />
Network (supplying 4,508 hours of animation in 1997) and Fox Kids.<br />
Between 1997-1999, time devoted to animation declined steadily from 13,013 hours<br />
to 10,326 hours as a result of the closure of TCC and a marginal decline in supply<br />
on Nickelodeon.<br />
In 2000-2001, the next notable leap in hours of animation on the dedicated channels<br />
was associated with increased supply from the Cartoon Network and the launch of<br />
Boomerang, Nick Jr, Toon Disney and Playhouse Disney, channels targeted specifically at<br />
the very young.<br />
32<br />
What Children Watch
Children’s light entertainment<br />
Total hours of children’s light entertainment on children’s channels<br />
Hours<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Hours 1,101 1,316 845 1,246 1,810 2,307<br />
■ Boomerang ■ TCC ■ Playhouse Disney ■ Toon Disney ■ Fox Kids ■ Disney Channel ■ Cartoon Network<br />
■ Nick Jr ■ Nickelodeon ■ Trouble<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
There has been a strong upward trend in light entertainment programming across<br />
non-terrestrial channels, with output growing almost three-fold from 845 hours (1998)<br />
to 2,307 hours in 2001. With only a handful of channels supplying this type of<br />
programming, growth has predominantly been as a result of increased emphasis on<br />
Trouble and Nickelodeon, as well as the launch of Toon Disney.<br />
What Children Watch 33
Pre-school<br />
Total hours of children’s pre-school on children’s channels<br />
Hours<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
556 550 682 585 1,250 2,086<br />
■ Boomerang ■ TCC ■ Playhouse Disney ■ Toon Disney ■ Fox Kids ■ Disney Channel ■ Cartoon Network<br />
■ Nick Jr ■ Nickelodeon ■ Trouble<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Between 1997 and 1999, there were only two key channels, Nickelodeon and the Disney<br />
Channel, catering for the needs of very young viewers. However, the launch of channels<br />
devoted specifically to these viewers resulted in total output increasing from 585 hours<br />
in 1999 to 2,086 hours in 2001. Nickelodeon’s pre-school programming was transferred<br />
to Nick Jr, now the most significant channel across this genre, and the Disney Channel<br />
also reduced its provision when Playhouse Disney was launched in 2000.<br />
34<br />
What Children Watch
7 Genre analysis by channel<br />
This section investigates the range of programming supplied by each channel. The total<br />
time dedicated to children has been divided into the five genre classifications as defined<br />
by BARB (children’s drama, factual, animation, light entertainment and pre-school) to<br />
illustrate the mix of programming across each of the terrestrial channels and a range of<br />
non-terrestrial channels. The figures in the following charts are based on the proportion of<br />
the total children’s broadcasting hours dedicated to each genre across each channel between<br />
1996-2001.<br />
Terrestrial television<br />
Children’s programming by genre: total terrestrial<br />
1996 3,494<br />
1997 3,986<br />
1998 4,517<br />
1999 4,417<br />
2000 4,517<br />
2001 4,652<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Although BBC1 dedicated a greater proportion of its schedule to drama, overall drama<br />
provision has remained fairly static at around 14% of the schedule. Factual<br />
programming fell from 23% in 1996 to 18% in 2001 - much of which was driven by<br />
the decline on BBC2, although it continues to be the main provider of such<br />
programming along with Channel 4 (schools programming).<br />
As a result of BBC1 and Channel 4’s move away from animation, the overall proportion<br />
of children’s programming represented by this genre fell from 36% in 1996 to 25% in<br />
1997, but picked up slightly as a result of Five’s launch in 1997. In 2001, BBC1<br />
provided marginally less than the average with 28% of its schedule made up of<br />
cartoons, whereas BBC2 (34%), GMTV (35%), ITV1 (49%) and Five (32%) all devoted<br />
more than a third of total children’s time to the genre.<br />
BBC1 and GMTV are the key terrestrial channels providing children’s light<br />
entertainment. The proportion of children’s programmes on the main networks<br />
represented by game shows, comedy shows etc fluctuated between 13%-18%.<br />
What Children Watch 35
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Pre-school offerings increased from 15% in 1996 to a peak of 28% of the total<br />
provision in 1998. In 2001, a quarter of the time devoted to children across the five<br />
main networks consisted of programmes targeted at the very young - both Channel 4<br />
and Five are particularly strong in this area.<br />
Considerable gaps have appeared in the range of programmes offered by ITV1 and<br />
BBC1. BBC1 has widened the diversity of its programming, with more pre-school and light<br />
entertainment as emphasis has moved away from animation on the channel, although - with<br />
BBC2 - the total hours devoted to this genre have, in fact, increased slightly.<br />
ITV1 has continued to rely heavily on animation.<br />
BBC1<br />
Children’s programming by genre: BBC1<br />
Hours<br />
1996 832<br />
1997 767<br />
1998 795<br />
1999 858<br />
2000 870<br />
2001 889<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
As noted in the 1997 report, drama on BBC1 continued to fluctuate, with a<br />
low of 14% (1996) and a high of 24% (1999).<br />
Similarly, the proportion of children’s television devoted to factual programming, such as<br />
Blue Peter, Newsround and The Really Wild Show, varied between 14%-18%.<br />
The 1997 study highlighted a steady upward trend in animation as a share of the<br />
children’s schedule between 1992-1996. However, the more recent data suggest this<br />
trend has reversed, with animation accounting for 28% of the schedule in 2001,<br />
compared with half (49%) of the schedule in 1996.<br />
As a result of the decline in animated programmes, provision of light entertainment<br />
increased from 16% of the 1996 schedule to 26% in 2001 with the introduction of<br />
shows such as Keenan and Kel and Steps to the Stars.<br />
The downward trend in pre-school programming seen between 1992-1996 also reversed<br />
with 14% of BBC1’s children’s schedule in 2001 dedicated to this genre, including<br />
programmes such as Teletubbies, Tweenies and Bill and Ben.<br />
36<br />
What Children Watch
BBC2<br />
Children’s programming by genre: BBC2<br />
Hours<br />
1996 923<br />
1997 930<br />
1998 1,041<br />
1999 1,057<br />
2000 1,176<br />
2001 1,288<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Drama programmes represented 15% of BBC2’s schedule in 1996. This share fell to a<br />
low of 7% in 1999, picking up again in 2001-2002 with the launch of programmes such<br />
as Maid Marion and Her Merry Men as well as re-runs of Byker Grove on Sunday<br />
mornings.<br />
With programmes such as Record Breakers, The Really Wild Show and Take Two,<br />
factual was the dominant genre in 1996, but has since been in decline, representing a<br />
quarter of the 2001 schedule, despite the fact that schools programming forms part of<br />
the total output.<br />
Over this period, animation replaced factual as the dominant feature of BBC2’s<br />
children’s line-up, accounting for a third of total provision.<br />
Pre-school programming increased from 14% in 1996 to 20% in 1997 when the<br />
Teletubbies phenomenon began, and since then, has varied between 20%-23% of the<br />
total children’s broadcasting hours on BBC2.<br />
What Children Watch 37
GMTV 6<br />
Children’s programming by genre: GMTV<br />
Hours<br />
1996 280<br />
1997 320<br />
1998 352<br />
1999 348<br />
2000 386<br />
2001 366<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Three key genres, animation, light entertainment and pre-school dominate<br />
GMTV’s schedule.<br />
There is no licensing requirement on GMTV to provide any drama output.<br />
In 1997, there was a decline in the proportion of total time devoted to animation,<br />
falling from 38% of the schedule in 1996 to 28% in 1997. During this period,<br />
pre-school programming increased, accounting for 15% of output.<br />
However, in 1998, emphasis moved away from light entertainment, back to animation<br />
and increasingly towards pre-school. The split in provision remained stable between<br />
1998-2000 - in 2001, there was a return to a similar divide in output as seen in 1997.<br />
6 GMTV was not considered separately in the 1997 study.<br />
38<br />
What Children Watch
ITV1<br />
Children’s programming by genre: ITV1<br />
Hours<br />
1996 460<br />
1997 409<br />
1998 386<br />
1999 406<br />
2000 448<br />
2001 430<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
The overall picture on ITV1 has changed little over the past six years. Animation continues<br />
to be by far the most prevalent genre of programming, representing half of the schedule<br />
in 2001. As a result of the increase in animated programming, pre-school material has<br />
been in decline since 1998. The proportion of ITV1’s schedule dedicated to drama has<br />
fluctuated between 20%-26%.<br />
In comparison with the BBC channels, factual programming continues to play a<br />
relatively small role, with only 7% of the schedule devoted to a handful of programmes<br />
such as Art Attack, How II and Brilliant Creatures in 2001.<br />
The share of total time devoted to children’s light entertainment has varied<br />
between 10-13%.<br />
What Children Watch 39
Channel 4<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Channel 4<br />
Hours<br />
1996 1,000<br />
1997 989<br />
1998 1,109<br />
1999 1,041<br />
2000 956<br />
2001 835<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Programming within the factual genre, much of which is accounted for by schools<br />
programming, and the pre-school genre such as Sesame Street and The Hoobs dominate<br />
Channel 4’s schedule for children.<br />
In 1996, animation accounted for 27% of the total schedule. Over the years, however, as<br />
emphasis has moved towards early morning pre-school programming, this genre has<br />
been in decline, representing only 9% of provision in 2001.<br />
It is important to note here that some of Channel 4’s most popular shows targeted at<br />
young viewers during dedicated slots such as T4 are not classified as children’s shows.<br />
Examples of this include:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Boy Meets World: light entertainment - sitcom US<br />
Malibu: drama serials non-UK<br />
Sister, Sister: light entertainment - sitcom US<br />
40<br />
What Children Watch
Five<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Five<br />
Hours<br />
1996<br />
1997 552<br />
1998 834<br />
1999 710<br />
2000 682<br />
2001 845<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ Five’s mix of children’s programming has varied significantly since its launch in 1997.<br />
■ Light entertainment has been on the decline since 1997, accounting for only 11% of total<br />
time in 2002, compared with a third of the schedule in its launch year. Figures suggest this<br />
genre has been cannibalised by animation as the proportion of the schedule dedicated to<br />
such programming has moved steadily upwards from 10% to 32% in 2001.<br />
■ Pre-school programming has consistently represented a large proportion of Five’s<br />
children’s provision, ranging from 30% in 2000 to a high of 44% in 1998.<br />
What Children Watch 41
Dedicated children’s channels<br />
Before analysing the mix of programming available on the dedicated children’s channels, it is<br />
useful to study the profile of each. The chart below looks at the age and gender profile of these<br />
services and illustrates the way in which each channel serves notably different audiences.<br />
Boomerang, Nick Jr, the Cartoon Network, Fox Kids, CBeebies and Playhouse Disney are all<br />
biased towards the younger four to nine year old viewers, whereas Trouble is more specifically<br />
targeted at young teenagers. Audiences of the most established channels, Nickelodeon and the<br />
Disney Channel, are more evenly balanced both by age and gender.<br />
Channel profile, multichannel homes, 2002<br />
Nick Jr<br />
CBeebies<br />
Playhouse Disney<br />
Boomerang<br />
Cartoon Network<br />
Fox Kids<br />
CBBC<br />
Toon Disney<br />
Disney Channel<br />
Nickelodeon<br />
Trouble<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Boys 4-9 ■ Boys 10-15 ■ Girls 4-9 ■ Girls 10-15<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
Base: Children in multichannel homes.<br />
42<br />
What Children Watch
Dedicated channels<br />
Children’s programming by genre: dedicated channels<br />
Hours<br />
1996 10,236<br />
1997 17,093<br />
1998 15,833<br />
1999 16,334<br />
2000 25,985<br />
2001 32,531<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ The chart above represents the split by genre of the combined provision across the<br />
dedicated children’s channels. It highlights once again the overwhelming dominance of<br />
animation, which represents 76% of total time in 2001, compared with 30% on<br />
terrestrial channels.<br />
■ Although the proportion of time devoted to drama peaked at a high of 24% in 1999,<br />
driven in the main by Nickelodeon, the Disney Channel and Fox Kids, this genre<br />
represented only 9% of the line-up in 2001 (versus 13% on terrestrial channels).<br />
■ As a proportion of children’s programming available, factual programming is virtually<br />
non-existent. In comparison, this genre represents 18% of programming across the<br />
terrestrial networks, albeit they are transmitting for a shorter period of time.<br />
What Children Watch 43
TCC<br />
Children’s programming by genre: TCC<br />
Hours<br />
1996 2,775<br />
1997 2,621<br />
1998 658<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■ In 1996, more than a third of the TCC schedule was represented by animation (38%),<br />
with a similar proportion of the time devoted to drama programming (36%). However<br />
from 1997, until the close of the channel in April 1998, emphasis shifted to cartoons,<br />
accounting for more than three-quarters of the channel’s output. Factual programming<br />
increased as a proportion of the schedule from 3% in 1996 to 10% in 1997 but,<br />
as with light entertainment and pre-school material, the supply of this genre<br />
diminished in 1998.<br />
44<br />
What Children Watch
Trouble<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Trouble<br />
Hours<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998 636<br />
1999 1,721<br />
2000 1,922<br />
2001 1,276<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Trouble was launched in 1998, and viewing data are available on the BARB panel from<br />
September 1998. Targeted at the teenage market, data illustrates the channel’s reliance<br />
on drama and light entertainment programming. In its first full year of transmission,<br />
63% of the schedule was represented by drama programmes such as USA High, Sweet<br />
Valley High and California Dreams. Over the years there has been a downward trend in<br />
provision of these programmes, substituted by light entertainment programmes including<br />
Saved by the Bell and Planet Pop.<br />
What Children Watch 45
Nickelodeon<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Nickelodeon<br />
Hours<br />
1996 3,312<br />
1997 3,728<br />
1998 3,726<br />
1999 3,728<br />
2000 3,950<br />
2001 4,116<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Nickelodeon continues to depend heavily on animation, which represents more than half<br />
of its total output. The share of its schedule devoted to cartoons declined from 67% in<br />
1996 to 50% in 2000, picking up again in 2001 (58%). During this downward trend<br />
between 1997-2000, animation was substituted by drama programmes such as Two of a<br />
Kind, Animorphs and Driven Crazy, which increased as a proportion of the schedule<br />
from 17% to 37%. However, in 2001, the increase in animation combined with the<br />
growth in children’s light entertainment led to a fall in drama provision. Factual<br />
programming fails to represent a significant amount of the channel’s output, with the<br />
provision in pre-school programming also disappearing over the years.<br />
46<br />
What Children Watch
Nick Jr<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Nick Jr<br />
Hours<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999 400<br />
2000 3,392<br />
2001 3,712<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Nickelodeon’s diminishing provision of pre-school programming since 1999 was<br />
compensated for by the launch of Nick Jr, targeted specifically at the younger end of the<br />
children’s audience. The channel was launched in 1999, and data are available on the<br />
BARB panel from September 1999. Again, there is heavy reliance on animation,<br />
representing more than 60% of the schedule. The remainder is represented by drama<br />
(11%) and pre-school programming such as Mr Men and Little Miss, Sesame Street and<br />
PB Bear and Friends.<br />
What Children Watch 47
Cartoon Network<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Cartoon Network<br />
Hours<br />
1996 759<br />
1997 4,600<br />
1998 4,673<br />
1999 4,781<br />
2000 6,403<br />
2001 5,408<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Predictably, there is little variation in the programming on the Cartoon Network, with<br />
the schedule consisting almost entirely of animation. However, once again, the<br />
drawbacks to the use of BARB data are highlighted with many of the animation<br />
programmes classified as ‘light entertainment-animation cartoons’ including Dino and<br />
Cavemouse, Flintstones and Ed, Edd and Eddy. This results in some of the programmes<br />
shown on the channel being excluded from the analysis.<br />
48<br />
What Children Watch
The Disney Channel<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Disney Channel<br />
Hours<br />
1996 2,603<br />
1997 2,428<br />
1998 3,046<br />
1999 2,888<br />
2000 2,725<br />
2001 2,610<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
In comparison to other non-terrestrial services, the Disney Channel appears to provide a<br />
more diverse schedule. Although animated programmes continue to dominate, its share<br />
of the channel’s total provision dropped from 67% in 1996 to 53% in 2001 as<br />
a result of the move towards children’s drama (including LA7, Miami 7 and Sweet<br />
Valley High) which represented a quarter of the 2001 line-up. Factual programming has<br />
steadily become a more significant part of the schedule, represented by programmes such<br />
as How Things Work, Art Attack and Bug Juice.<br />
What Children Watch 49
Toon Disney and Playhouse Disney<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Toon Disney<br />
Hours<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000 958<br />
2001 4,770<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Playhouse Disney<br />
Hours<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000 660<br />
2001 2,625<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
The steady decline away from animation and pre-school on the Disney Channel may be<br />
associated with the launch of Toon Disney and Playhouse Disney in 2000. Although<br />
animation programmes represent the majority of the schedule on both channels, 15% of<br />
the output on Toon Disney is light entertainment, and a quarter of the total transmission<br />
time on Playhouse Disney is dedicated to pre-school. This may help to explain the<br />
difference in the age profile of the two spin-off channels.<br />
50<br />
What Children Watch
Fox Kids<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Fox Kids<br />
Hours<br />
1996 787<br />
1997 3,716<br />
1998 3,094<br />
1999 2,816<br />
2000 3,203<br />
2001 3,557<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Fox Kids was launched in 1996 - data for the channel are available from October of<br />
that year. Its bias towards a relatively young audience (aged four to nine years) may be<br />
explained by the fact that more than 80% of its programming provision in 2001<br />
consisted of cartoons. Between 1997-1999, there was a steady move away from animation<br />
in favour of children’s drama (representing 37% of the schedule in 1999), including<br />
Fantastic Four and Grimm’s Fairy Tales, but since then emphasis has once again returned to<br />
animated programming. There is little provision of factual, light entertainment or pre-school<br />
programming.<br />
What Children Watch<br />
51
Boomerang<br />
Children’s programming by genre: Boomerang<br />
Hours<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000 2,773<br />
2001 4,458<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
Viewing figures for Boomerang are available from May 2000. The range in<br />
programming on this channel is similar to that seen on the Cartoon Network. In 2001,<br />
cartoons represented 99% of the schedule - the remaining 1% was accounted for by<br />
some light entertainment programming.<br />
52<br />
What Children Watch
CBeebies and CBBC<br />
Children’s programming by genre: BBC channels, February-December 2002<br />
Hours<br />
CBeebies 3,344<br />
CBBC 2,609<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school ■ Miscellaneous<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Although the report does not look in detail at programming provision in 2002, the<br />
impact CBBC and CBeebies have made since launch (page 60, Audience Share by<br />
Channel) suggests some reference needs to be made to the range of programming<br />
provided by the two new BBC channels.<br />
The chart above looks at the proportion of children’s programming output dedicated<br />
to each genre on the two channels based on 11 months of data since launch in February<br />
2002.<br />
As the profile of the two channels suggests (page 42) target audiences are notably<br />
different. With pre-school programming representing more than 50% of its output,<br />
CBeebies caters for younger children - 90% of its audience is aged between four and<br />
nine years. Cartoons account for 15% of the schedule, and both drama and light<br />
entertainment programming represent 10% of output.<br />
In comparison, CBBC targets a wider range of viewers and this is reflected in the range<br />
of programming provided. Although the channel does not offer any pre-school<br />
programming (supplied in the main by CBeebies), 37% of its output in 2002 was<br />
represented by factual programming, including Newsround and Xchange during the<br />
morning segment. Animation (27% of output) and drama (13%) provision is<br />
concentrated during the afternoon slot.<br />
What Children Watch 53
54<br />
What Children Watch
8 Children’s viewing habits<br />
Children’s total viewing<br />
According to BARB figures, the average individual in the United Kingdom in 2002 watched<br />
3 hours 34 minutes of television each day. Viewing among children aged 4-15 is considerably<br />
lower, at an average of 2 hours 23 minutes per day. There are, however, significant differences<br />
in the viewing habits of those in multichannel homes compared with those receiving the five<br />
terrestrial channels. Children in multichannel homes watch on average 35 minutes more per day<br />
(2 hours 27 minutes) than those in analogue terrestrial homes watching only 1 hour 52 minutes<br />
per day. Figures on children’s viewing suggest a similar amount of time (approximately 30<br />
minutes) is spent watching children’s programming. Therefore the difference in total viewing<br />
between analogue terrestrial and multichannel children must be accounted for by other genres<br />
such as drama, films and music.<br />
Non-terrestrial channels account for over a third of children’s viewing, compared with only<br />
22% of viewing by the average individual. Both ITV1 and BBC1 combined represent 41%<br />
of viewing, compared with 50% of viewing by individuals. BBC2, as the most dominant<br />
provider of children’s material across the five main networks, maintains its audience share<br />
among viewers aged 4-15 years (11%). The popularity of BBC2 is further demonstrated in<br />
terrestrial homes where the channel makes up 16% of viewing by individuals and 22% of<br />
children’s viewing. More significantly, over half of all viewing by children in multichannel<br />
homes is of channels other than the main networks, compared with 42% of viewing by<br />
individuals in these homes. BBC2’s share falls to 6% in multichannel homes, as children turn<br />
to the niche children’s channels. ITV1 and BBC1 account for 32% of children’s viewing.<br />
Within multichannel homes, viewing by children of the main networks has decreased by<br />
20% from an average of 1 hour 25 minutes/day in 1997 to 1 hour 8 minutes/day in 2002.<br />
Viewing by this audience of children’s programmes on the terrestrial channels has decreased<br />
by a greater amount: from 12 minutes per day in 1997 to 8 minutes in 2002 - a fall of 33%.<br />
Audience share by channel: individuals vs children, 2002<br />
All individuals<br />
All children<br />
Terrestrial individuals<br />
Terrestrial children<br />
Multichannel individuals<br />
Multichannel children<br />
■ BBC1 ■ BBC2 ■ ITV1 ■ C4 ■ Five ■ Others<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
What Children Watch 55
The chart above shows how total children’s viewing is divided between channels across TV<br />
household type in comparison with the average individual.<br />
Average TVR by quarter hour, children<br />
30<br />
25<br />
All children<br />
Terrestrial children<br />
Multichannel children<br />
20<br />
Average TVR<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0600 - 0615<br />
0645 - 0700<br />
0730 - 0745<br />
0815 - 0830<br />
0900 - 0915<br />
0945 - 1000<br />
1030 - 1045<br />
1115 - 1130<br />
1200 - 1215<br />
1245 - 1300<br />
1330 - 1345<br />
1415 - 1430<br />
1500 - 1515<br />
1545 - 1600<br />
1630 - 1645<br />
1715 - 1730<br />
1800 - 1815<br />
1845 - 1900<br />
1930 - 1945<br />
2015 - 2030<br />
2100 - 2115<br />
2145 - 2200<br />
2230 - 2245<br />
2315 - 2330<br />
Quarter hour<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday (2002)<br />
The graph above illustrates children’s viewing patterns throughout the day. The first peak of<br />
the day occurs during the breakfast time slot and peters out after 0900. The second peak<br />
starts at 1530 as audiences return home from school, representing the start of the evening’s<br />
viewing which reaches a pinnacle between 1945-2000 when 26% of children are watching<br />
(2.4 million children). Children are watching, in significant numbers, programmes that fall<br />
outside the children’s programming genre. After this time, there is a steady decline in<br />
audiences although even after the Watershed a significant proportion of this group continues<br />
to watch television. The data suggest 18.79% of all children are watching between 2100-<br />
2230, rising to 19.5% of those in multichannel homes. Viewing during this segment is also<br />
higher among older children with 23.8% of 10-15 years old watching compared with<br />
13.5% of four to nine year olds.<br />
56<br />
What Children Watch
As the table below shows, the top television programmes, across the entire children’s<br />
audience in 2002, were….<br />
Top programmes (all children) 2002<br />
Programme Genre Channel 000s Viewers<br />
EastEnders Drama: soap operas UK BBC1 2,371<br />
Pop Idol Live Final Entertainment: family shows ITV1 2,218<br />
Only Fools and Horses Entertainment: situation comedy UK BBC1 2,087<br />
A Bug's Life Films: cinema US BBC1 1,942<br />
The Mummy Films: cinema US BBC1 1,919<br />
World Cup 2002:<br />
Argentina vs England Sport: football BBC1 1,910<br />
Coronation Street Drama: soaps UK ITV1 1,804<br />
World Cup 2002:<br />
England vs Denmark Sport: football BBC1 1,738<br />
World Cup 2002:<br />
England vs Nigeria Sport: football BBC1 1,733<br />
World Cup 2002:<br />
England vs Sweden Sport: football BBC1 1,696<br />
Source: BARB (Highest occurrence only)<br />
What Children Watch 57
Viewing to children’s programmes<br />
Diversity in children’s viewing, 2002<br />
Terrestrial children<br />
Multichannel children<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%<br />
■ Drama ■ Factual ■ Animation ■ Light entertainment ■ Pre-school ■ Miscellaneous<br />
Viewing to children’s programming, 2002<br />
Average Minutes of Viewing Per Day Terrestrial Children Multichannel Children<br />
Total 30 29<br />
Drama 3.6 1.6<br />
Factual 5.2 1.6<br />
Animation 11.9 15.6<br />
Light entertainment 5.0 3.0<br />
Pre-school 3.8 4.6<br />
Miscellaneous 0.7 2.4<br />
Source: BARB Monday-Sunday<br />
Terrestrial Children: BBC1, BBC2, ITV1, Channel 4, Five<br />
Multichannel Children: BBC1, BBC2, ITV1, GMTV, Channel 4, Five, Boomerang, Cartoon Network Total, Disney<br />
Channel Total, Playhouse Disney, Toon Disney, Fox Kids Total, Nickelodeon Total, Nick Jr Trouble, CBBC, CBeebies<br />
The above graph and table illustrate the differences (by proportion of viewing time and in<br />
terms of actual minutes per day, respectively) in the viewing of children’s programmes<br />
between children in terrestrial households and those in multichannel homes. The graph<br />
shows how viewing in 2002 was split across the children’s genres. In multichannel homes,<br />
we look at total viewing of Nickelodeon, Fox Kids, Cartoon Network and the Disney<br />
Channel, taking into account viewing of the replay channels.<br />
Although children in multichannel homes have a wide range of children’s channels available,<br />
the amount of time spent watching programmes classified within the children’s genres stands<br />
at around 30 minutes per day - similar to the amount spent by children in terrestrial homes.<br />
58<br />
What Children Watch
Although children in multichannel homes have many more programmes to watch, the split<br />
in viewing by genre suggests that the domination of animation across dedicated channels<br />
influences their viewing choices. Animated programmes make up 39% of viewing by<br />
children with access to analogue terrestrial channels only - in comparison, more than half of<br />
all viewing of children’s programmes in multichannel homes was of animation (54%). Thus,<br />
while multichannel children have access to more programming, they are watching a less<br />
diverse range of children’s programmes than those living in terrestrial homes. In particular,<br />
faced with a wider choice of other programming, only 5% of the total viewing time in<br />
multichannel homes was spent watching factual material.<br />
What Children Watch 59
Audience share by channel: multichannel children<br />
Boomerang<br />
Cartoon Network<br />
Cartoon Network Total<br />
CBBC<br />
CBeebies<br />
Disney Channel<br />
Disney Channel Total<br />
Toon Disney<br />
Playhouse Disney<br />
Fox Kids<br />
Fox Kids Total<br />
Nick Jr<br />
Nickelodeon<br />
Nickelodeon Total<br />
Trouble<br />
■ 2000 ■ 2001 ■ 2002<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Sunday<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7%<br />
60<br />
What Children Watch
With the influx of new channels over the years, the dedicated children’s channels have seen<br />
dramatic movements in audience share. The more established channels, Cartoon Network,<br />
Nickelodeon and the Disney Channel, have all suffered from declining audience share. At<br />
the same time, new players such as Boomerang, the spin-off Disney Channels, Trouble and,<br />
more recently, the new BBC channels, CBBC and CBeebies, have made a notable impact on<br />
the long-running channels.<br />
Audience share by quarter hour, 2002<br />
Weekday viewing by children in multichannel homes<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
BBC1<br />
BBC2<br />
ITV1<br />
C4<br />
Five<br />
Other<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0600 - 0615<br />
0645 - 0700<br />
0730 - 0745<br />
0815 - 0830<br />
0900 - 0915<br />
0945 - 1000<br />
1030 - 1045<br />
1115 - 1130<br />
1200 - 1215<br />
1245 - 1300<br />
1330 - 1345<br />
1415 - 1430<br />
1500 - 1515<br />
1545 - 1600<br />
1630 - 1645<br />
1715 - 1730<br />
1800 - 1815<br />
1845 - 1900<br />
1930 - 1945<br />
2015 - 2030<br />
2100 - 2115<br />
2145 - 2200<br />
2230 - 2245<br />
2315 - 2330<br />
2400 - 2415<br />
Share, %<br />
Source: BARB, Monday-Friday<br />
Channel performance throughout the day highlights some interesting trends in the viewing<br />
habits of multichannel children. Viewing of non-terrestrial channels is highest during the<br />
daytime segment between 0930-1530, when viewing of terrestrial channels is at its lowest.<br />
In the early morning (0600-0930) the terrestrial channels, in particular BBC2, perform<br />
relatively well, although it is clear that, as viewing of the non-terrestrial channels increases,<br />
these channels lose audiences. The fall in viewing of non-terrestrial channels and the<br />
increase in viewing of BBC1 and ITV1 between 1530-1730 demonstrates the continuing<br />
importance of the main networks in multichannel homes - this is also illustrated by the list<br />
of top-rating children’s programmes in these homes. Viewing of non-terrestrial channels dips<br />
during the evening as viewing of BBC1 and ITV1 increases, although audiences switch back<br />
to these channels after 2030.<br />
What Children Watch 61
Top children's programmes, 2002<br />
Programme Genre Channel Viewers, proportion Viewers, 000s<br />
of children(%)<br />
All children<br />
Newsround Factual BBC1 10.9 1,007<br />
Smart on the road Factual BBC1 10.7 989<br />
All About Me Light Entertainment BBC1 10.6 976<br />
Christmas at Club Blue Peter Light Entertainment BBC1 10.4 958<br />
CBBC at the Fame Academy Light Entertainment BBC1 10.3 949<br />
Blue Peter Factual BBC1 9.9 915<br />
Grange Hill Drama BBC1 9.7 894<br />
Film: Snow White Animation CH4 9.7 893<br />
Viva S Club Drama BBC1 9.6 885<br />
Mona the Vampire Animation BBC1 9.4 865<br />
Multichannel children<br />
All About Me Light Entertainment BBC1 7.8 446<br />
Newsround Factual BBC1 6.7 385<br />
Bob the Builder Animation BBC1 6.2 355<br />
Stig of the Dump Drama BBC1 6.1 352<br />
Fingertips Factual ITV1 6.1 349<br />
Smart on the Road Factual BBC1 6.1 348<br />
Blue Peter Factual BBC1 6.0 346<br />
The Ghost Hunter Drama BBC1 6.0 343<br />
The Cramp Twins Animation BBC1 5.9 340<br />
The Story of Tracy Beaker Drama BBC1 5.7 330<br />
Source: BARB (highest occurrence only)<br />
62<br />
What Children Watch
9 New media<br />
Since the previous study conducted by the Broadcasting Standards Commission in 1997,<br />
Internet penetration has risen from 5% to 43% (The Public’s View 2002). Figures show<br />
penetration is skewed towards households with children - 49% of these households have<br />
access via a computer in the home.<br />
This, along with the technical development of games consoles and the growth of mobile<br />
‘phone penetration, has meant that today’s children are faced with more diverse media<br />
choices, both as a source of entertainment and of communication. These extra choices will<br />
undoubtedly lead to the fragmentation of children’s leisure time as they spend time away<br />
from the television, using their PCs, mobile phones or games consoles.<br />
Netvalue measures the usage of the Internet at home and is based on a panel of 7000<br />
households. In June 2002, the average child connected to the internet 10 times, spending<br />
28 minutes online during each session. Frequency of usage is marginally lower than among<br />
adults, who connect 17 times per month, but the average session for children is two minutes<br />
longer. Usage is highest on weekends, between 1800-2100 and after school, between<br />
1500-1800, whereas adult usage is heaviest between 1800-midnight.<br />
Figures suggest 52% of 7-16 year olds own a mobile phone, rising to 82% of 14-16 year<br />
olds (Source: NOP). As well as contributing significantly to the millions of SMS messages<br />
sent via mobile phones each day, children are heavy users of the Internet as a means of<br />
communication. They are more likely than the average Internet user to participate in instant<br />
messaging (38% of online children versus an average of 28% of the Internet population)<br />
and visit chat rooms (8% of online children versus an average of 5% of the Internet<br />
population), as shown below.<br />
Online activities: children vs all individuals<br />
Leisure/games<br />
Leisure/entertainment<br />
Media/television<br />
Instant messaging<br />
Chat<br />
■ Children 4-5 ■ All individuals<br />
Source: Netvalue, June 2002<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50%<br />
What Children Watch 63
The chart highlights sectors that children have a strong affinity with compared with the<br />
average Internet user. Surfers aged 4-15 are more likely to visit sites categorised under the<br />
games (ea.com, gamesdomain.com, gamefaqs.com), entertainment (neopets.com,<br />
warnerbros.com, disney.com), instant messaging, and television (BBC, Channel 4, Cartoon<br />
Network, Nickelodeon etc) sectors.<br />
64<br />
What Children Watch
10 Changes since the 1997 study<br />
The analysis conducted in 1997 had been an update of a project, with similar objectives,<br />
conducted for the Broadcasting Standards Commission by Professor Blumler in 1992 7 . That<br />
study had considered the provision and range of children’s programming on the terrestrial<br />
channels between 1981 and 1991. There were significant methodological differences<br />
between the two studies, but broad trends and changes could be found.<br />
This analysis, of children’s programme provision in the five years to 2001, updates Professor<br />
Messenger Davies’s study, which had tracked changes from 1992 to 1996. Again, there are<br />
methodological differences. While Professor Messenger Davies had used BARB-based<br />
analysis tools, she also conducted desk research looking at issues such as origination of<br />
production. The analysis presented here is taken entirely from the BARB, industry-based<br />
measurement system. Despite these differences, an overview of trends in children’s<br />
programme provision can be taken, both in terms of time and variety of material. Data<br />
presented here offer a further analysis of the changes since 1991:<br />
1. Growth in children’s programme provision: measured by time<br />
■ The time devoted to children’s programming between 1991 and 1996 had risen<br />
considerably, due to more programming offered on BBC2, Channel 4 and,<br />
in particular, the introduction of the satellite and cable-delivered channels, devoted<br />
to children’s programming.<br />
■<br />
The current analysis found a further increase. The introduction of Channel 5 (now<br />
Five) and an increase in children’s programming provision on BBC2 have<br />
contributed to this change. In addition, a number of new channels have been<br />
introduced for those in multichannel homes. These are either new services or<br />
channels which target particular age groups, having split from ‘host’ channels (e.g.<br />
from the Disney Channel stable have come two new channels, Toon Disney and<br />
Playhouse Disney). 8<br />
2. Change in children’s programme provision: daypart analysis<br />
■ The 1997 study had noted that the increase in children’s programming provision<br />
occurred primarily during the morning slot and weekends.<br />
■<br />
This analysis of the years from 1996 showed that the increase on analogue terrestrial<br />
channels continued to be in the provision of children’s programming in the early<br />
morning or breakfast slot (0600-0929).<br />
■<br />
There was little change in the late morning (0930 –1159) or after school<br />
(1530-1729) slots.<br />
■<br />
Provision in the early afternoon slot (1200-1529) had fallen over this period.<br />
7 Blumler, J. G., The Future of Children’s Television in Britain: An Enquiry for the Broadcasting Standards Council, 1992.<br />
8 It needs to be borne in mind that two further BBC children’s channels were launched in 2002.<br />
What Children Watch 65
3. Diversity in children’s programme provision<br />
■ Professor Messenger Davies’s study had shown that animation had become the dominant<br />
form of children’s programming on all channels, regardless of whether they were<br />
terrestrial or satellite or cable-delivered. While recognising that the general increase<br />
in this genre was driven by provision on the dedicated satellite and cable channels,<br />
the study was also able to show significant increases on the BBC and commercial<br />
terrestrial channels.<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
The analysis of genres since Professor Messenger Davies’s study shows that<br />
animation is still the main genre within children’s output across all channels.<br />
However, the analyses do not differentiate between the styles of animation, which<br />
are varied, nor is any information available on country of origin.<br />
Three-quarters of the output on the dedicated channels falls within this category.<br />
BBC2 also increased its output of animated programming, as did Five and GMTV,<br />
the breakfast time commercial Channel 3 service.<br />
■<br />
The 1997 study had shown that, despite the increased concentration on animation in all<br />
the schedules, the provision of drama on the BBC channels had remained stable, while<br />
Channel 4 had increased its provision. The analysis had also shown an arrest in the<br />
decline of time devoted to the drama genre on ITV1.<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
The analysis of output since then confirms that drama provision has continued to<br />
increase, albeit slowly, with Five making a significant contribution to this genre,<br />
especially around 1999. This peak in provision on the channel appears to have fallen<br />
back in the past two years (to 2001).<br />
BBC1 also made a significant contribution to this genre, but the level of output has<br />
decreased since 1999, with BBC2 taking an increasing share.<br />
Provision on ITV1 has remained constant.<br />
While there had been growth in this genre across the period sampled on the<br />
dedicated satellite- and cable-delivered channels, a sharp decline was noted in 2001,<br />
and the output will have to be tracked to see what is happening.<br />
■<br />
BBC1 was noted to be the main home of factual programming in the 1997 study, with<br />
provision on BBC2 overtaking it in the last year considered (1996). While Channel 4<br />
was noted to be increasing its minutage across the sample period to 1996, the genre was<br />
considered to be declining across all the schedules.<br />
66<br />
What Children Watch
■<br />
■<br />
In this analysis to 2001, the dedicated channels offered virtually no factual<br />
programming, while Channel 4’s dominance continued. This is due primarily to the<br />
fact that schools programming, a significant proportion of Channel 4’s output, is<br />
classified by BARB as factual.<br />
BBC2 is another key provider of factual programming (including schools<br />
programming) while the other commercial analogue terrestrial services continue to<br />
show a decline in provision in this area.<br />
■<br />
Light entertainment programming on ITV1 was high in the 1997 study and represented a<br />
far greater share of its schedule than BBC1. By 1996, this genre on BBC2 was beginning<br />
to match the levels on BBC1.<br />
■ Comparative data, to 2001, showed there was some provision of light entertainment<br />
on the dedicated children’s channels, based around a few channels. Output had<br />
grown almost threefold across the period monitored.<br />
■ BBC1 led BBC2 in this area within the sample period.<br />
■ ITV1's output remained stable while there was some decline noted in Five’s<br />
provision<br />
in this area.<br />
■ This genre was the main constituent of children’s programming for GMTV.<br />
■<br />
Both Professor Blumler and Professor Messenger Davies referred to the importance of<br />
‘the provision of pre-school programmes as a separate indicator of a broadcasting<br />
organisation’s commitment to children as a unique and different audience’. There was,<br />
however, a decline noted in this category on both Channel 4 and BBC1, as the latter<br />
shifted programmes to BBC2.<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
The analysis of the years from 1996 to 2001 suggested fluctuating provision of<br />
programming aimed at the pre-school audience on analogue terrestrial television,<br />
with a dip in provision corrected by 2001.<br />
Much of the increase in provision in the last year surveyed came from Five.<br />
On the dedicated channels, the increased targeting of age groups meant that<br />
pre-school provision increased dramatically, with both Nickelodeon and the Disney<br />
Channel creating formats designed exclusively for this audience.<br />
What Children Watch 67
68<br />
What Children Watch
Section 2<br />
The opinions of children and parents<br />
about children’s programming provision<br />
Background<br />
The study carried out previously by Professor Messenger Davies included interviews with<br />
professionals, but not children themselves. This latest study, as well as providing an update<br />
of the actual amount and range of children’s programming available, includes qualitative<br />
research with both children and some parents to find out their respective expectations of<br />
children’s programming and whether these are being met.<br />
Qualitative research is useful for telling us something about the story behind the viewing<br />
figures. It does not provide statistics, but offers an insight into the views and opinions held<br />
by audiences. It helps to answer questions such as: what do children think about what they<br />
watch? How do they select the programmes they see, and how has multichannel television<br />
changed their viewing habits? What are parents’ concerns with current output, and are these<br />
different from children’s concerns? Are children happy with the range and diversity of<br />
programming aimed specifically at them? How are children using the electronic programme<br />
guide (EPG), and what effect has it had on their viewing habits?<br />
Focus groups and trio depth interviews were carried out with a range of children aged<br />
6 - 12 years, along with some family observations and discussion groups with parents. 9 This<br />
research provides an understanding of the importance of children’s television to children,<br />
both on terrestrial and digital channels.<br />
Objectives<br />
The key objective for this part of the project was to understand both children’s and parents’<br />
responses to current children’s programming in the United Kingdom, in the context of the<br />
growth of multichannel access and digital television and its associated interactive services.<br />
More specifically, the research aimed to look at:<br />
■ the differences between multichannel and terrestrial-only homes, both in terms of their<br />
demands, and perceptions of what they get, from the children’s genre;<br />
■ the impact of scheduling and of the electronic programme guide (EPG) on viewing;<br />
■ audience responses to ‘traditional’ quality measures;<br />
■ attitudes towards merchandise-based programming;<br />
■ opinions about the origination of programmes.<br />
9 See Appendices 1 and 2 for details of methodology and sample.<br />
What Children Watch 69
70<br />
What Children Watch
11 The role of television<br />
The work of Professor Livingstone and Moira Bovill (2001) 10 found that the importance of<br />
television to young people and children is very clear. It is the most pervasive medium in<br />
European homes and the one children spend most time with by far. Out of a list of 16<br />
media, both boys and girls in the majority of the 12 European countries surveyed named<br />
television as the medium they would miss most. This finding was particularly true for<br />
British children, emphasising the United Kindom’s strong screen entertainment culture. UK<br />
children have one of the highest levels of personal ownership of television sets in Europe.<br />
Uniquely, they are as likely to have a television set in their bedroom as they are to have a<br />
shelf of books.<br />
Livingstone and Bovill set out to look at the role of the media and how they shape, as well as<br />
are shaped by, children’s and young people’s identity and culture, and their relations with<br />
family, peers, school and community. The framework for their study was initially conceived as<br />
a follow-up to Himmelweit et al’s 1958 postwar study, Television and the Child. 11 Despite the<br />
dramatic technological changes over the decades since this original study, in many respects<br />
children’s lives are as they were 20 or even 40 years ago. ‘Children grow up, watch television,<br />
ride their bikes, argue with their parents, study hard, or become disaffected with school, just<br />
as they always did... Then, just as we find today, children prefer to play outside with their<br />
friends than use the media, mainly watching television to relieve boredom.’<br />
This new, much smaller scale qualitative research shows a high degree of continuity with<br />
previous studies. The findings reinforce the continued importance of television viewing<br />
within the context of children’s busy lives, but also show that, regardless of the increased<br />
access to new media, additional television channels etc, children continue to enjoy doing<br />
many of the things that they have always enjoyed doing. The research took place over the<br />
summer months when most children said that their favourite thing to do was to play outside<br />
with their friends. Parents encourage their children to be outside if the weather is good,<br />
although there are concerns for their children’s personal safety.<br />
There are well-documented differences in media use between the genders. In this study, the<br />
boys were found to enjoy computer games and games consoles - PlayStation 2 was still a<br />
firm favourite. The girls were more likely to read on occasions, although this was not a<br />
popular activity for the majority, and to listen to music.<br />
In general, however, television is very much the main leisure activity in the home. Most of<br />
the children in the study could not imagine life without television. They were asked what<br />
they would do if their television was taken away:<br />
‘I wouldn’t be able to live without my TV.’<br />
(Girl, aged 9, Manchester)<br />
‘I would be really disappointed if I didn’t have TV anymore.’<br />
(Boy, aged 8, London)<br />
10 Livingstone, S. and Bovill, M., Children and Their Changing Media Environment A European Comparative Study, 2001.<br />
11 Himmelweit, H. T., Oppenheim, A. N. and Vince, P., Television And The Child, 1958.<br />
What Children Watch 71
‘Life without TV... no way!’<br />
(Girl, aged 8, Birmingham)<br />
‘I would be really angry if I didn’t have TV to watch. What would I do?’<br />
(Girl, aged 11, London)<br />
The light bulb effect<br />
Just like a light bulb, the television is always on. It tends to be put on first thing in the morning<br />
when the household wakes up, and it is often still on last thing at night. One father said:<br />
‘I switch it off when I go to bed at night - I’m usually the last one awake - and the kids<br />
turn it on in the morning.’<br />
(Father, London)<br />
The television is almost like a member of the family in its own right. And it is continually<br />
evolving, especially in multichannel homes where there are new channels and programmes<br />
on offer all the time. In these homes, children find it almost impossible to turn it off<br />
because there is always something to watch. BARB data show that children in multichannel<br />
homes are watching 35 minutes more per day (four hours a week) than children in<br />
terrestrial homes.<br />
In many households, the television stays on even when no one is in. Parents in these<br />
households see it as a burglar deterrent. It also stays on while mothers are getting on with<br />
their household chores. They like to have some background noise in the house, so they just<br />
leave it on even if they are not watching it.<br />
Equipment in the home<br />
Virtually every home these days contains more than one television set, and the number of<br />
sets per household in the United Kingdom is increasing. Nowadays, particularly in homes<br />
with children, there is practically a television set in every room in the house. Some families<br />
who took part in this research were found to have as many as six or seven televisions in the<br />
home. The bathroom seems to be the only room that does not contain a television, although<br />
one family admitted that they did have a small portable that on occasions found its way<br />
into the bathroom. Television sets were usually located in:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
the living room<br />
parents’ bedroom<br />
the kitchen<br />
all the children’s bedrooms<br />
TV room/play room<br />
It is not uncommon for all the televisions in the house to be on at the same time.<br />
72<br />
What Children Watch
Access to multichannel television<br />
Normally only one of the television sets in the home has multichannel access on it, however,<br />
and this is usually the main set. In some homes, there is the ability to watch these additional<br />
channels one other set, but this television is still controlled via the main set. This main set is<br />
the one family members fight for control of, with the exception of mothers who rarely<br />
becomes involved in debates over viewing. As long as they have access to soap operas on the<br />
main set, most mothers are happy.<br />
TVs in bedrooms<br />
Many children aged nine and over have a television in their bedroom. It is usually a handme-down<br />
or they have been given it as a birthday or Christmas present. Most children are<br />
now being bought a combined television/video. Parents have an issue about televisions in<br />
bedrooms if they have younger children (under nines), or are first-time mothers. They often<br />
feel uncomfortable admitting that their child has a television in his/her bedroom. They feel<br />
they have to justify it in some way and will say that it helps their child to get to sleep or<br />
that it is just there for the PlayStation, or that there is no aerial because it is only used for<br />
watching videos.<br />
The VCR<br />
The video recorder still plays an important role in children’s lives. All children have a video<br />
collection and regularly watch videos, especially younger children. Mothers of younger<br />
children like the control this offers - they appreciate the reassurance of knowing exactly<br />
what their children are watching. Watching films on video is an activity which many<br />
families enjoy together. Perhaps this contributes to the fact that many children are watching<br />
films targeted at a much older age group. Most of the children who took part in this<br />
research had seen films with certificate ratings of 12 and 15. Parents are less concerned<br />
about their children watching these kinds of films if they are around to check up or to<br />
watch with them.<br />
What Children Watch 73
74<br />
What Children Watch
12 When, where and how<br />
are children watching?<br />
When and where?<br />
To a large extent, children are watching when they want. Most children are<br />
watching television:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
in the morning before school<br />
as soon as they get home from school<br />
some during dinner<br />
while doing their homework<br />
weekend mornings<br />
weekend evenings<br />
Although some parents do try to control the amount of television their children watch, in<br />
reality there seems to be very little ‘policing’.<br />
Mornings before school<br />
Since 1996, there has been a significant growth (over 120%) in the provision of children’s<br />
programming on the terrestrial channels during the breakfast slot (0600-0929), particularly<br />
on the BBC channels, Five and Channel 4. In line with this, and coupled with the<br />
availability of children’s programmes on the dedicated channels, most children are watching<br />
television in the morning before school. Parents and children give a number of different<br />
reasons for this ‘morning fix’. Some children say that having background noise helps wake<br />
them up. Parents say it helps kto eep them occupied until they themselves get up. Children<br />
watch television while having their breakfast and just before they leave for school. It fills in<br />
time if they are waiting for friends to collect them en route. Some say their parents offer<br />
them the chance to watch television as a reward for getting ready for school.<br />
There are some households where television is not allowed in the morning as ‘it gets in the<br />
way’, but these families are very much in the minority.<br />
Afternoons after school<br />
Viewing patterns show that the second peak for the child audience occurs at 1530 (Page 56<br />
of this report). Putting the television on is almost like a reflex action. Children arrive home<br />
from school, and often the first thing they do is to put the television on. They immediately<br />
want to know what is on. Children, especially those from terrestrial-only homes, know that<br />
the afternoon is when the ‘good’ programmes are scheduled.<br />
What Children Watch 75
(Boy, aged 12, Birmingham)<br />
(Girl, aged 9, Manchester)<br />
Afternoon television is seen by both children and parents as time to relax after a hard day at<br />
school. It is children’s ‘chill out’ time - a chance to escape from the real world. The mother<br />
endorses this time and hands over responsibility to her children. She trusts what is on<br />
during weekday afternoons, and especially on the analogue terrestrial channels, knowing the<br />
programming is targeted at children. She allows them to take control of their viewing while<br />
she is busy elsewhere.<br />
76<br />
What Children Watch
Over dinner/tea<br />
It is taken for granted in most homes that the television is left on when children do their<br />
homework. Children themselves often say it helps them to concentrate. They are used to<br />
having background noise; it is something they have always done and is a comfort to them.<br />
‘You might not necessarily be really watching and listening, but it’s always<br />
on in the background.’<br />
(Boy, aged 12, Birmingham)<br />
Children have learnt to screen in and out; to attend to the television and then to filter it out if<br />
they are doing something else, e.g. homework. It is almost as if they have developed the ability<br />
to multi-task. Some parents insist that the television goes off, but the vast majority feel that, as<br />
long as their children finish their homework, the television can stay on. Most of the children<br />
who took part in the research were amazed that turning the television off might be a<br />
consideration. They could not conceive why it would be thought necessary.<br />
Weekend mornings<br />
Weekend mornings were thought by most respondents to provide the best children’s<br />
television. Children felt there was always something on for them to watch at this time,<br />
whether they had terrestrial or multichannel television. Terrestrial-only viewers considered<br />
that they were particularly well catered for.<br />
‘I love it when I wake up on a Saturday, and you just know there is going<br />
to be good telly.’<br />
(Terrestrial, boy, aged 12, Manchester)<br />
Evenings<br />
In the lounge<br />
Children have less control over viewing in the evenings. Evenings tend to be more family<br />
viewing time where the household is often watching more ‘adult’ programming. Parents take<br />
more control if there is a specific programme on that they want to watch. As another<br />
report, Striking a Balance 12 found, parents are keen to protect their own ‘leisure space’.<br />
After the Watershed there is some regulation of children’s viewing. The more potentially<br />
inappropriate adult programmes are often banned outright, or parents decide to watch with<br />
their children. For example, Bad Girls and Big Brother were cited as programmes that<br />
parents watched with their children. Watching these kinds of programmes, from the<br />
children’s point of view, is often a good way to negotiate going to bed later, every child’s<br />
primary goal. Parents admitted that they often gave in to pestering.<br />
‘They’re always like, “Please, please, please, I have to watch it.”‘<br />
(Father, London)<br />
12 Edited by Hanley, P., Striking a Balance: the control of children’s media consumption, British Broadcasting Corporation,<br />
Broadcasting Standards Commission and Independent Television Commission, 2002.<br />
What Children Watch 77
In the bedroom<br />
Many children watch television in bed before going to sleep. They say it helps them to fall<br />
asleep. Children have ultimate control over what they watch in the evening in their<br />
bedroom, but currently it is only the terrestrial channels they are viewing.<br />
‘You can watch anything you want in your room, but there’s not many channels.’<br />
(Girl, aged 8, Manchester)<br />
Some mothers of younger children control their viewing by having the bedroom<br />
television linked to a VCR rather than to an aerial. They may watch part of a video<br />
before going to sleep.<br />
‘I always put on a video just before they go to bed - one of their favourites. It helps<br />
them to unwind and relax before sleeping.’<br />
(Mother, Manchester)<br />
Children tend to flick during evening viewing in their bedrooms and stay up beyond their<br />
official bedtime. This is something parents are aware of, but nevertheless tolerate.<br />
How do children watch?<br />
Children sit very close to the television set. The best seat is the one nearest the television. It<br />
is the chair or space that siblings argue over. It is likely to be the easiest place to flick from.<br />
It is easier for multichannel children to read the electronic programme guide (EPG) if they<br />
are sitting close to the television.<br />
‘You just get the best view when you sit near.’<br />
(Girl, aged 10, London)<br />
Sitting close means less disturbance from other family members. Children described the<br />
sense of control they have when they are in close proximity to the television set where<br />
no one can get in their way.<br />
78<br />
What Children Watch
(Boy, aged 10, Edinburgh)<br />
Who do children like to watch with?<br />
Given the choice, all the children in the research said that they would prefer to watch on<br />
their own. The reasons that they gave were to do with control. When alone, they gain<br />
control of the remote control and choose what to watch and when to flick. If they are on<br />
their own they can choose where to sit as well. Children mentioned the fact that watching<br />
with others can be annoying because their parents always talk through programmes,<br />
younger siblings are a nuisance, and older siblings take away control of the remote.<br />
(Girl, aged 9, Manchester)<br />
What Children Watch 79
They did mention some programmes that they preferred to watch with others, such as<br />
football with their father, films and game shows such as Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?<br />
with the whole family, and soap operas with their mother.<br />
(Girl, aged 9, Manchester)<br />
Control of the remote<br />
For all the children, having control of the remote control is the ultimate aim. They<br />
acknowledge that whomever has it in their hands has control, so the ‘controller’ rarely puts<br />
it down. If s/he does, someone else will take it and assume control. Others in the room<br />
usually make requests to the ‘controller’. These ‘back seat controllers’ are typically peers<br />
who may or may not be listened to. Ownership will be passed on when the ‘controller’<br />
leaves the room.<br />
Older siblings tend to be in charge, so younger children often have to watch what their older<br />
brothers and sisters want to watch. Younger children gain control when the older members of<br />
the family do not want to watch any more or are not that bothered about what is on.<br />
Parental regulation<br />
Pre-Watershed, children are given free range to watch pretty much what they want. Parents<br />
assume that programming before 2100 is suitable for their children to watch alone. Post<br />
2100 parents differ in terms of what they consider suitable for their children to watch. Some<br />
parents are stricter than others, but most seem to give in quite easily to their children’s<br />
pestering. Many parents feel it is just not worth the argument, especially with children aged<br />
10 years and older. Ten appears to be the age when parents start to become more relaxed<br />
about monitoring their children’s viewing. This ties in with the findings from Striking a<br />
Balance, which found that, around this age (the top class in junior school), there is a drive<br />
towards separation from parental influences.<br />
All the parents were aware that their children may watch ‘unsuitable’ programmes when not<br />
in their care, e.g. at friends’ houses, grandparents’ homes, in their bedrooms.<br />
80<br />
What Children Watch
Fathers know more than mothers do?<br />
Mothers think they know what their children watch, but the reality is that most rarely<br />
watch television with their children. They are usually too busy elsewhere, clearing up and<br />
making dinner etc.<br />
‘I’d like to think I know what they watch, but I never remember the [programme]<br />
names or anything.’<br />
(Mother, Birmingham)<br />
Fathers, on the other hand, say they do not have a clue about their children’s viewing, but in<br />
practice were found to spend more time watching television with their children than they<br />
said they did or realised they did. It appears to be almost subconscious viewing. One father,<br />
for example, was unaware that he was singing along, word perfect, to the tune of the Power<br />
Puff Girls! It is likely that mothers find it hard to sit down and watch television with their<br />
children because they are always conscious of the chores that have to be done.<br />
Summary<br />
To summarise, the role of television in children’s lives is a bit like a noisy light bulb. It is on<br />
all the time, and everywhere in the home. Children prefer, ideally, to watch it on their own.<br />
They feel they would be lost without television and spend most of their time trying to gain<br />
control of it.<br />
What Children Watch 81
82<br />
What Children Watch
13 Children’s understanding<br />
of television<br />
Programmes and channels<br />
Children are confused as to what is a programme and what is a channel, particularly those<br />
under the age of eight years. Multichannel viewing has largely created this confusion<br />
because today’s children are switching, between so many more channels and programmes.<br />
They get the words mixed up and call programmes ‘channels’ and vice versa.<br />
‘BBC is a programme with lots of programmes on it.’<br />
(Girl, aged 8, Manchester)<br />
Children are unaware that they are mixing up programmes and channels, and believe that<br />
they know exactly what they are talking about. They do not ‘feel’ confused and do not<br />
regard it as a problem.<br />
Genres<br />
Younger children under the age of eight years have some understanding of different<br />
programmes and segment them on a very basic level - programmes ‘for me’, programmes<br />
‘for adults’ and programmes ‘for everybody’. The main bulk of viewing of children this age<br />
is of the children’s programming genre only. By about nine years of age, however, children<br />
start to understand and become more aware of the different genres and their repertoire of<br />
genres increases. They talk about preferring to watch music programmes versus cartoons, or<br />
real-life programmes, nature programmes etc.<br />
Channel loyalty<br />
In general, there is less channel loyalty than there once was. Children are programme<br />
seekers, rather than channel seekers. They tend to search out their favourite programmes.<br />
Multichannel children are aided by the EPG to search for programmes rather than to look<br />
for specific channels. Although they do still have favourite channels, the distinction between<br />
channels is blurred when there are so many to choose from. Multichannel children are not<br />
always aware of what is on when.<br />
Terrestrial-only children, with a limited number of channels to choose from, and in the<br />
absence of an EPG to help organize their viewing, are more aware of the channel they are<br />
watching at a given time. This does not necessarily result in greater channel loyalty,<br />
however, as terrestrial children do not feel a particularly strong affinity with any of the five<br />
channels on offer. That said, they are aware of CITV and CBBC as branding, and the<br />
younger children in the research spontaneously referred to CBeebies, so they do have a sense<br />
that parts of the terrestrial networks are dedicated to programming especially for children,<br />
and this is appreciated. Terrestrial parents feel that this demonstrates that broadcasters care<br />
about their child audience. They considered it would be unacceptable for any of the<br />
What Children Watch 83
terrestrial channels to stop showing children’s programming or to limit the provision. They<br />
thought it would demonstrate a lack of interest on the part of terrestrial broadcasters in serving<br />
a part of their viewing audience. Additionally, these parents had so far resisted paying for more<br />
channels and strongly objected to being forced down the route of having to pay for dedicated<br />
channels as a result of a diminished children’s service on free-to-air channels.<br />
‘If children’s television was taken away, then it would be videos, I suppose. It certainly<br />
wouldn’t make me necessarily be lulled into purchasing digital TV.’<br />
(Mother, Edinburgh)<br />
When talking of the removal of children’s television from one of the terrestrial channels:<br />
‘I think it’s saying that the kids aren’t good enough so we’re putting the boring cricket<br />
match on instead of programmes for the kids.’<br />
(Mother, Edinburgh)<br />
‘Not everybody has access [to digital] and not everybody can afford digital, so the BBC<br />
has a duty to give everybody across the range the opportunity to watch programmes<br />
they enjoy. Possibly ITV1 don’t have that duty, but then it can fund programmes from<br />
advertising, so it should cater for everyone, too.’<br />
(Mother, Edinburgh)<br />
Favourite programmes<br />
Children have lots of favourite programmes, and these change all the time. For terrestrial<br />
viewers, in particular, their favourites are dependent on the schedules and what is currently<br />
being broadcast. Children easily forget if a programme has not been on for a few weeks.<br />
Multichannel schedules are far more predictable, as they show most of the same<br />
programmes each day/week.<br />
But in reality there is little difference between the ‘favourites’ of multichannel and terrestrial,<br />
however, only children. They tend to like the same programmes. The key difference is that<br />
children in multichannel homes get to see their favourite programmes more often.<br />
84<br />
What Children Watch
Some favourite programmes<br />
Young girls<br />
Power Puff Girls<br />
Recess<br />
Sabrina<br />
Tom and Jerry<br />
EastEnders<br />
Older girls (9+)<br />
Saved by the Bell<br />
The Simpsons<br />
EastEnders<br />
Friends<br />
Recess<br />
Casualty and Holby City<br />
Sabrina<br />
Young boys<br />
Bay Blades<br />
Dragon Ball Z<br />
The Simpsons<br />
Wrestling (some)<br />
Dexter’s Laboratory<br />
Robot Wars<br />
Older boys (9+)<br />
Lads Army<br />
The Simpsons<br />
Football<br />
Malcolm in the Middle<br />
Buffy<br />
Scrap Heap Challenge<br />
Robot Wars<br />
What Children Watch 85
(Girl, aged 9, Manchester)<br />
The Simpsons<br />
The Simpsons is a show for the whole family. Everyone enjoys it, even mothers. It is the<br />
kind of programme that children like watching over and over again. It has something in it<br />
for everyone. It was spontaneously mentioned as a ‘favourite’ in every children’s group. It is<br />
easy watching and a programme that makes everyone laugh.<br />
You’ve Been Framed<br />
Children love this programme. It is funny, easy to watch and they hugely enjoy seeing adults<br />
making fools of themselves. This is a really popular programme with all age groups.<br />
Sabrina<br />
Sabrina is still very popular, especially with girls who relate strongly to the main character.<br />
They see her as ‘a girl like me but a bit different’. It has make-believe and fantasy for<br />
younger children, but also real-life teenage issues for the older girls. Children also think it<br />
looks good, in terms of its production values. They have a sense that it is ‘high quality’.<br />
Again, they like to watch it repeatedly.<br />
‘The kind of programme you can watch over and over again.’<br />
(Girl, aged 8, London)<br />
86<br />
What Children Watch
‘I think for children like mine, Sabrina is less harmful than Grange Hill. Grange Hill is<br />
very real, whereas Sabrina is a bit of a fantasy really.’<br />
(Mother, Edinburgh)<br />
Blue Peter<br />
Blue Peter remains popular with terrestrial viewers, but multichannel children are less<br />
enthusiastic about it. Some of the children said that they tuned in to the parts of the<br />
programme they liked, but often did not watch the whole programme. They thought it was<br />
quite mixed, with good and bad bits. Multichannel viewers have less patience when<br />
watching and switch over more quickly. They are less likely to return because of the choice<br />
of other programmes available.<br />
Art Attack<br />
Art Attack is still very popular. It is one of the programmes that all children enjoy watching<br />
and talking about. It is clever and intriguing.<br />
‘You always want to be able to do what he does.’<br />
(Boy, aged 10, Edinburgh)<br />
They know their parents approve of them watching this programme and they recognise<br />
themselves that it has an educational value, but it is also fun.<br />
Newsround<br />
Newsround is not a programme that most children say they actively choose to watch,<br />
although viewing figures show that it was the top children’s programme in 2002. Many are<br />
perhaps watching it because of its scheduling, i.e. immediately before Neighbours on BBC1.<br />
But children say they are interested in news stories that are especially relevant to them,<br />
e.g. if they involve children or are of great significance, such as the terrorist attack on the<br />
Twin Towers and the war in Iraq. Some multichannel children are watching adult news<br />
channels i.e. Sky News and BBC News 24.<br />
Soap Operas<br />
Ownership of the soap operas resides with mother. Most children watch them because their<br />
mothers do. Girls and mothers refer to watching soap operas together as ‘bonding’ time.<br />
Viewing soap operas allows children a window into the adult world. They feel more grown<br />
up watching programmes that deal with real-life issues and relationships. Striking a Balance<br />
comments on the fact that parents feel that their children are maturing earlier; although they<br />
highlight the difficulty in judging whether their physical and social maturity is matched by<br />
their emotional maturity, and that there is a need to educate children about the real world.<br />
The media, and soap operas in particular, are thought by parents to have a role in this. 13<br />
Even young children of six and seven years of age are watching soap operas with their<br />
mothers. There are mothers who have concerns about some of the issues in the soap operas<br />
13 Millwood Hargrave, A. with Gatfield, L., Soap Box or Soft Soap? Broadcasting Standards Commission, 2002.<br />
What Children Watch 87
ut these tend to be the ones who do not watch them. Those who do are largely happy to<br />
continue to allow their children to watch with them.<br />
Sport<br />
Sport is fathers’ domain. Fathers usually control the sport watching, and boys love watching<br />
with them. Football is a favourite. It creates a sense of togetherness when the whole family<br />
watches events such as the World Cup. Other sporting events, which have united the family,<br />
include the Commonwealth Games, Wimbledon etc.<br />
Music channels<br />
Multichannel children, especially older children, are watching music channels a lot. They<br />
find them easy to turn to - they are always there and there is always something to watch.<br />
These channels offer good ‘in between’ viewing, even the young ones aged five or six will<br />
tune in for short periods. They learn the moves and the words, and it allows them into the<br />
world of music, a world that terrestrial viewers rarely get to see on a regular basis.<br />
Nature programmes<br />
Nature and wildlife programmes are very popular with both girls and boys and these are<br />
often watched as a family. Children know that their parents like them to watch these<br />
programmes, but they do enjoy them.<br />
‘They’re good because you actually learn something.’<br />
(Girl, aged 11, London)<br />
Nature programmes are more popular with terrestrial viewers, especially when shown on a<br />
Sunday night. Boys tend to enjoy the more violent series such as Ultimate Killers and<br />
Walking with Beasts, and episodes about sharks or crocodiles. Girls prefer programmes<br />
about cuter animals such as dolphins, elephants or baby animals.<br />
Cartoons<br />
Cartoons are what children love to watch. They see them as television they own - television<br />
that is really for them. They watch cartoons every day, especially the boys. They are fun and<br />
easy to watch.<br />
‘No brainer TV.’<br />
(Boy, aged 12, Birmingham)<br />
88<br />
What Children Watch
(Girl, aged 11, London)<br />
In general, all children like to watch a variety of programmes. Watching anything for too<br />
long can become boring. As one child said, ‘You can even tire of watching The Simpsons’.<br />
They value diversity in programming, something which is underpinned by the viewing<br />
figures which show that children’s top programmes (see p57 of the report) include a range<br />
of genres: factual (including news), light entertainment, animation and drama. This is the<br />
same across both terrestrial and multichannel households.<br />
What Children Watch 89
Gender differences in programme content<br />
Girls have a clear interest in human relationships, particularly friendships and romance as<br />
they grow older. The girls in this research tended to favour real-life issue programmes. The<br />
cartoons they preferred often had an element of ‘real life’, e.g. Recess and Rugrats. The girls<br />
liked soap operas and dramas such as Casualty and Holby City.<br />
The boys tended to be more into sports, action, adventure, fantasy and noise. They cited<br />
among their favourite programmes action manga cartoons such as BeyBlades and Dragon<br />
Ball Z, and loud and interactive game shows such as Scrapheap Challenge and Robot Wars.<br />
And many were avid watchers of football. Boys’ interests in action and adventure have been<br />
found also to influence their choice of electronic games, reading material and video rentals,<br />
as well as affecting their musical tastes. 14<br />
(Boy, aged 10, Edinburgh)<br />
14 Lemish, D. Liebes, T. and Seidman, V., Gendered Media Meanings and Uses. In: Children and their Changing Media Environment,<br />
edited by Livingstone S. and Bovill M., 2001.<br />
90<br />
What Children Watch
14 Terrestrial versus multichannel<br />
Overview<br />
Terrestrial and multichannel television are two different worlds. Multichannel children<br />
always have something to watch whatever the time of day, so they tend to watch television<br />
more than terrestrial-only children do. Viewing figures show that multichannel children are<br />
watching 35 minutes more per day. It is harder for those in multichannel homes to actively<br />
turn the television off when they know that there are always programmes on for them to<br />
see. But increased choice does not necessarily mean greater diversity. The earlier part of this<br />
report shows that the balance of children’s programming on individual dedicated channels is<br />
more limited, when considered as a proportion of broadcast time, than on the individual<br />
terrestrial channels. Even when the hours of transmission are taken into account, the<br />
balance of programming on the main dedicated channels is weighted towards light<br />
entertainment in the form of animation.<br />
Notably, although multichannel children have more programmes available specifically for<br />
them, they are not watching any more children’s programming than are terrestrial children<br />
(30 minutes per day). The rest of the time, therefore, they are watching genres outside<br />
children’s television.<br />
Terrestrial children do not have the same luxury of always having children’s programmes to<br />
turn to, so often when they turn on the television they cannot find anything to watch. As a<br />
result, they are more selective about their viewing and only watch at certain times. If there is<br />
nothing on that they want to see, they will turn the television off.<br />
Terrestrial children<br />
It is fair to say that terrestrial children are a ‘dying breed’. Most are part-time multichannel<br />
viewers anyway. They may watch at their father’s house if their parents are separated or<br />
divorced, at grandparents’ or at friends’ homes. Given the choice, most would like to have<br />
multichannel television at home. But they accept not having it because there is a sense that<br />
they will get it in the end - it is only a matter of time.<br />
Terrestrial children tend to switch on the television set and flick. Sometimes they know what<br />
is going to be on and have made an appointment to view. More often than not they switch<br />
on and hope they will find something to watch. They have a feel for when their programmes<br />
are on, but otherwise they will flick around until they find something. If nothing is on, they<br />
will turn the television off.<br />
Terrestrial children know exactly when the children’s programmes are on, although not<br />
necessarily the schedules themselves. For example, they know that the best times for them<br />
are immediately after school and on Saturday mornings. If they can read, some will use a<br />
television guide magazine, although most find the guides quite complicated. Some prefer to<br />
use a newspaper and a few said that they turned to teletext.<br />
What Children Watch 91
Sunday night is the one time when many terrestrial children wish they had multichannel<br />
television. It is only terrestrial children who get ‘the Sunday Night Blues’. Not only do they<br />
have homework to complete and school the next day, but also there is nothing to watch on<br />
television. Terrestrial children know that those with multichannel television do not have the<br />
same problem. For those with cable and satellite channels, Sunday night is just the same as<br />
every other night.<br />
‘There’s hardly ever anything to watch on a Sunday, only sometimes they have a good<br />
nature programme on.’<br />
(Boy, aged 12, Birmingham)<br />
.<br />
Multichannel children<br />
All those with multichannel television said that life before Sky was really boring. They were<br />
enthusiastic about having access to lots of channels. Before Sky or cable, they said that they<br />
often found it difficult to find something to watch; there was less choice and not enough<br />
programmes for children. They said that they frequently ended up watching programmes<br />
that they did not really like. They referred to terrestrial television as ‘plain TV’.<br />
When asked about terrestrial or ‘plain TV’, multichannel children said that it was not really<br />
for them. They watched it sometimes, but it was not a first choice to view. They mentioned<br />
that they sometimes watched programmes with the rest of the family on the five terrestrial<br />
channels, but otherwise did not choose to visit these channels very often.<br />
Younger children who had always had multichannel television did not really know about<br />
‘plain TV’. BBC1 to them was just a channel with a number like all the rest. Some referred<br />
to the BBC channels as Channel One and Channel Two.<br />
Multichannel television has changed the lives of mothers who have younger children,<br />
especially those with pre-schoolers. It offers a day-long schedule that the children can turn<br />
to whenever they want, which allows mothers to get on with their chores. It is almost like a<br />
substitute nanny.<br />
Multichannel children are becoming more sophisticated at a younger age. They watch<br />
more and they see more, therefore, they want more and expect more. Although they put<br />
up with more repeats, they are also constantly looking for the new and different, and they<br />
often find it. They have more to explore and are open to a much wider repertoire of<br />
programmes and channels. For many, having five channels is an unimaginable thought.<br />
What would you watch?<br />
92<br />
What Children Watch
The EPG has brought viewing to life and made it more interactive. Multichannel viewers<br />
have a number of different ways to decide what to watch. The length of time children have<br />
had multichannel television affects how they use the EPG. Long-term users tend to know the<br />
numbers of their favourite channels and flick through them in what seems an organised way,<br />
starting with the number of their favourite channel and working their way through. They<br />
are actively looking for programmes, but have an awareness of which channels their<br />
‘favourites’ are on. Those who have not had multichannel television for long start with the<br />
programme guide lists, either looking at ‘All Channels’, or looking in the ‘Kids’ section.<br />
This research uncovered evidence that children do plan their viewing in advance using the<br />
EPG. Children who have little or no control of the remote control in their family are using<br />
the EPG to gain some control. They utilize the EPG’s ‘programme planners’ at the beginning<br />
of the day to plan their viewing. The programme they want to watch flashes up a reminder<br />
on screen five minutes before it is about to start. Other family members will often then<br />
relinquish control and allow them to watch their favourite programme.<br />
The decision on what to watch is quick. Children flick through or read through, making<br />
decisions very quickly. Frequently the channels further on in the electronic guide do not even<br />
get a look-in as children have already made their decision before they get there. Those<br />
channels which may be missing out, currently include CBBC, CBeebies, some of the Disney<br />
channels and Discovery Kids.<br />
Children tend to have some idea of what they want to watch, and as soon as they see it they<br />
press ‘select’. Typically, they do not go back to the TV guide page again. Once they have<br />
made an initial choice, they then flick through, looking at what is on elsewhere while they<br />
watch what they have selected, or alternatively they use numbers they know.<br />
The replay channels<br />
There is no longer any need for children to rush back from something to see a programme<br />
or even to video programmes. The popular children’s channels all have replay channels that<br />
show the same programmes an hour later than the normal channel. Children are aware of<br />
this and will catch up on any programme they have missed. If they do not, they know that it<br />
will be on again in the next few days. There is less urgency to watch their favourite<br />
programmes because they are always available.<br />
What Children Watch 93
Interactive television<br />
Interactive television is by no means being used to its full potential, although most with<br />
multichannel television are aware that interactive services are available to them. Children<br />
rarely use it and have little to say about it at the moment. Some parents said they used it for<br />
news and had used it during the Big Brother 2002 series, which was on when fieldwork was<br />
being conducted. Very few mothers use it for shopping. They do not trust it and feel it lacks<br />
choice - it is easier currently, for example, to order clothes from a mail order catalogue, so<br />
there is low incentive to shop interactively. Children consider the games are reasonable, but<br />
nowhere near as good as their games consoles. They think the graphics are slow and ‘not<br />
that brilliant’. E-mail is currently not as easy to use via the television as it is on the home<br />
computer, so most do not bother.<br />
The majority have an awareness that technology moves on very quickly, however, and that it<br />
is improving all the time, so they believe the future lies with interactivity, but currently it is<br />
far too slow and difficult to use and does not do enough to warrant their involvement.<br />
Quality issues<br />
Children and parents have different views when it comes to what makes a good<br />
programme. Children tend to be looking for a bit of escapism, a good storyline and<br />
humour. Parents prefer children to be watching programmes that have some sort<br />
of moral or educational value, and they especially dislike slang.<br />
A quality programme<br />
For Children<br />
Looks good<br />
Bright and colourful<br />
Good storyline<br />
Humour<br />
Escapism<br />
For Parents<br />
Ideally has a moral<br />
Educational value<br />
Good storyline<br />
Good production values<br />
No slang (especially mothers of younger children)<br />
The one thing that parents will not tolerate is swearing. They find it offensive and<br />
unnecessary. It is not what they want to be seen allowing their children to watch. It works<br />
against what they are trying to teach their children about good manners and behaviour. But,<br />
parents will tolerate it under certain circumstances, e.g. when it is used in a real-life<br />
situation. Parents and children, especially boys, cited Lads Army as an example of a<br />
programme that they were allowed to watch which contained a high level of bad language.<br />
Parents’ reasoning was that this was not swearing for swearing’s sake. They did not consider<br />
programmes such as South Park to be in the same category and objected to the language<br />
used in the cartoon, which they felt was designed to appeal to children, even though<br />
children are not the target audience.<br />
94<br />
What Children Watch
About programming generally:<br />
‘I can’t bear it when they swear all the time and my kids are watching with me. It makes<br />
them think it’s okay to swear, and it’s just not helpful.’<br />
(Mother, Birmingham)<br />
Merchandising<br />
The issue of merchandising was raised with parents. There was not a great deal of<br />
antagonism towards merchandise-based programming. The popularity of merchanised<br />
products is at its peak among children under the age of four. Mothers get a great deal of<br />
vicarious pleasure from giving their youngsters presents, they know their children will love.<br />
To children this age it is the real thing.<br />
By seven years, however, the desire to have lots of favourite television programme products<br />
lessens considerably. At this age, it is more the occasional T-shirt or pencil case that is being<br />
bought, often as a gift rather than something the seven year old has specifically asked for.<br />
As children grow older, they tend to look for products that are endorsed or sponsored by<br />
their favourite personalities, e.g. sportsmen or women, or pop stars.<br />
Repeats<br />
Children tolerate repeats well. They use them to get a ‘quick fix’. If they have seen<br />
something many times before, they might dip in and out. Repeats used to be more of an<br />
issue, but now many see there are some benefits. Most children will not watch the same<br />
episode twice in a day, but other than that they are happy to watch the episode over and<br />
over again. It does not appear to be a contentious issue, but rather something they have<br />
grown used to and accept. For those who have always had multichannel television, it is<br />
what they have always known.<br />
‘I’d rather watch a repeat of something I like than a new episode of something I don’t.’<br />
(Girl, aged 9, London)<br />
That is not to say, however, that, if new and different programmes were to dry up, children<br />
would not eventually become bored with the limited choice of programming available.<br />
What Children Watch 95
Programme origination<br />
American children’s programming dominates the dedicated channels and, in many cases, is an<br />
increasing part of the terrestrial broadcasters children’s schedules. In 1996, American<br />
productions made up a quarter of the output of children’s programming on ITV1 (Source: ITC).<br />
This has risen to 30% in 2002, although the level has been relatively stable over the past four<br />
years. Five has seen a marked increase year-on-year from 16% of total output in 2001 to 35%<br />
in 2002. Channel 4 shows a significant reduction in its purchase of American content (down<br />
from 84% of total children’s output in 1997 to 43% in 2001 to 27% in 2002).<br />
Children’s views<br />
Most children, especially those under the age of 10-11 years, know little about the origin of<br />
the programmes that they watch. It is not something that concerns them. Children in<br />
London often assume a programme is from the United States and children outside London,<br />
e.g. Scotland, often believe that everything comes from London. It is not until around 11 or<br />
12 years that they start to understand and have an opinion about ‘foreign’ material and<br />
then they can be quite judgmental, e.g. ‘It’s American rubbish’.<br />
Parents’ views<br />
The majority of the parents interviewed were quite happy with the type of children’s<br />
programmes on offer, but more so on the terrestrial channels. Some were critical of the<br />
domination of animation on most of the dedicated children’s channels. They were aware of<br />
the American influence across children’s programming generally, but were pragmatic about<br />
the fact that their children enjoy many of the American shows such as Sabrina, Hey Arnold,<br />
and Keenan & Kel. They felt that these kinds of programmes enable children to escape into<br />
a fantasy world away from the reality of school and homework. They offer a bit of light<br />
relief and are often funny and make children laugh.<br />
‘I just like good programmes, I don’t care where they come from.’<br />
(Mother, Manchester)<br />
Mothers of younger children (under eight) and especially terrestrial-only mothers had more<br />
issues. Some were concerned about children picking up American accents, but the main<br />
worry was that these programmes were not ‘homemade’ and therefore were considered to<br />
be less culturally relevant. Some mothers also felt they were less educational.<br />
‘There are certain American ones which do actually really annoy me... teaching kids to<br />
pronounce things in a certain way, and the language isn’t right for British kids.’<br />
(Mother, Edinburgh)<br />
‘Cheap, rubbish. Bought-in TV.’<br />
(Mother, Manchester)<br />
96<br />
What Children Watch
‘I find Friends quite shallow. It’s in snippets. It’s a bit like reading The Sun - a little bit<br />
here and a bit there. The British ones tend to follow more of a story, more of a theme -<br />
a bit more in depth.’<br />
(Mother, Manchester)<br />
‘Look at the Teletubbies. That’s a UK creation and that swept the world.’<br />
(Mother, Edinburgh)<br />
Given the choice, however, it is the American shows that many children seem to prefer<br />
watching. Children think that they look better and perceive them to have higher production<br />
values. They make them laugh, and they find the humour more sophisticated. They allow<br />
for escapism, and for some children they were seen to be aspirationa,l with clever, funny<br />
characters living in worlds which children found attractive. American programmes were<br />
perceived to be ‘for my age group and above’ which gives children a sense that they are not<br />
being spoken down to. Programming appeal has been found to be linked to perceptions by<br />
children of its positioning as ‘older’ or ‘younger’ than themselves (Messenger Davies et al). 15<br />
While there are different types of UK-based children’s dramas, few seem to incorporate all<br />
of the values of the US-based dramas. Often slapstick humour is used, and, while many<br />
children love it, it can feel young. Programmes such as My Parents Are Aliens are enjoyed,<br />
but tend to be seen as being for younger children. Book-based dramas such as The Worst<br />
Witch and The Queen’s Nose are very popular with the under 10s but, whilst older children<br />
still watch them, given the choice they would prefer more ‘grown up’ programming.<br />
US shows appear to have a far broader appeal. They are more multi-leveled so there is<br />
something in them for everyone. British programmes such as Grange Hill and Byker Grove<br />
are well liked and remembered by terrestrial children, but they are almost forgotten by<br />
multichannel children. The latter always have the choice to watch something else. These<br />
kinds of UK children’s soap dramas are often seen as depressing, and, although they are<br />
more relevant to British children’s lives, they do not fit well with the ‘home from school<br />
mood’ and the need of children for a bit of escapism. Children want to chill out and relax<br />
when they get home from school and not have to think about anything too heavy. Given the<br />
choice, most would opt to watch a funny US programme.<br />
15 Messenger Davies, M., O’Malley, K. and Corbett, B., Channels to the Future. Children’s views about broadcasting provision.<br />
In: What Price Creativity? edited by Ralph, S., Langham Brown, J. and Lees, T., 1997.<br />
What Children Watch 97
98<br />
What Children Watch
15 Conclusions<br />
New media abound, but television retains its importance as the primary source of leisure<br />
entertainment for children. Nevertheless, it has to continue to compete. The leisure industry<br />
is expanding at a rapid rate as new technologies flood the market. Many of the early<br />
adopters of these technologies are households with children. The competition for children’s<br />
leisure time has never been greater.<br />
Television has had to evolve to keep pace. The landscape of children’s television, in<br />
particular, has changed dramatically. Currently, there are 10 main dedicated children’s<br />
channels broadcasting children’s programming 24 hours a day. The provision of children’s<br />
programming overall has tripled in the past five years. Not only do children have access to<br />
their own programmes whenever they want, but also the development of dedicated replay<br />
channels, which repeat schedules every hour, means that they never have to worry about<br />
missing their favourite programmes. Perhaps it is not surprising that it is harder for<br />
multichannel children than it is for terrestrial children to turn the television off.<br />
Terrestrial children have far less flexibility about when they can view and less choice about<br />
what to watch. Television may be a disappointment to them at times, but they do value<br />
what they have and look forward to the times of day when there are programmes on for<br />
them. They are much more able than are multichannel children to turn the television off<br />
when their programmes have ended and to find alternative forms of entertainment.<br />
Most of children’s everyday viewing occurs within the children’s genre, but they also<br />
regularly dip into:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
music<br />
soap operas<br />
real-life dramas<br />
sport<br />
some nature programmes<br />
Multichannel television has created a sense of ownership among the child audience.<br />
Children now feel that they own a part of television. And having additional dedicated<br />
channels has raised their expectations and demands. Children want and expect a good<br />
choice of programmes across a number of channels. They expect to see new programmes on<br />
offer all or most of the time, and they eagerly embrace these new offerings.<br />
Dedicated channels have changed the way children view. This audience no longer has to<br />
worry about missing their favourite programmes because they know they will be on again.<br />
Neither do they have to confine their viewing to certain times of the day because whatever<br />
the time of day there will be programmes on for them to watch. The electronic programme<br />
guide has given children more control over their viewing, and they are adept at using it.<br />
What Children Watch 99
Although terrestrial viewers are less sophisticated, most have regular access to cable or<br />
satellite channels and therefore have many of these expectations as well. They know it is<br />
only a matter of time until they get digital television themselves. Terrestrial parents,<br />
however, would seem to have more conservative views. They do not see a need for any more<br />
television. They consider there is already too much content that is not of good quality. It<br />
may be quite a difficult task to shift these terrestrial ‘die hards’’ views.<br />
In essence, whether multichannel or terrestrial, children are looking for good programmes.<br />
They have little channel loyalty, especially in the multichannel world where there are so<br />
many options to choose from. Children are a critical audience and they want high quality<br />
programmes that entertain, contain humour, provide interesting information and above all,<br />
do not speak down to them.<br />
While multichannel children are watching more television than terrestrial children are, it is<br />
significant that it is not more children’s programmes they are tuning in to but other kinds of<br />
programming. Analogue terrestrial broadcasters offer a better balance of programming<br />
across the hours they broadcast and more original British productions, which are valued by<br />
parents and enjoyed by children. The challenge facing terrestrial broadcasters is to continue<br />
to compete within an increasingly competitive market place. The BBC has taken the step of<br />
creating its own dedicated channels, CBBC and CBeebies, available in multichannel homes.<br />
It remains to be seen whether other terrestrial broadcasters will see an economic need to<br />
follow suit.<br />
As far as the future is concerned, viewers’ expectations are:<br />
■ access to digital channels will be available on every set in the home,<br />
■ interactive television will be used on a regular basis,<br />
■ internet access via the television will be available to all households,<br />
■ there will be televisions in every room and possibly even in the car.<br />
Everyone realises that the future is changing. Children are an audience eagerly embracing<br />
the digital age and families will be the early adopters of the latest technology. There are<br />
still a group of parents, however, who remain to be convinced that more choice means<br />
better quality.<br />
100<br />
What Children Watch
Appendix 1: Methodology<br />
Rosenblatt Research was commissioned by the ITC and the BSC to carry out qualitative research involving<br />
children’s groups, mini groups (trios), and family observations with a range of children aged between six<br />
and 12 years. In addition, a number of parent groups was held. A variety of different techniques were used<br />
in order to facilitate understanding of children’s views in relation to children’s programming. The fieldwork<br />
was carried out by Nicki Karet and Abby Jones.<br />
Children’s photo journals<br />
All the children who took part in the research were asked to keep a journal/diary for a week, prior to<br />
coming to their group/trio. They were asked to describe what television programmes they liked watching,<br />
and why, and to say who they liked watching them with. They were asked also to give an account of<br />
what they liked doing when they were not watching television, e.g., leisure activities, seeing friends.<br />
Each child was given a disposable camera and asked to take pictures to illustrate their interests and the<br />
things/people that were important to them. The aim of the journals was to determine how television fits in<br />
to children’s lives. They contain fascinating insights into children’s lives and thoughts. Illustrations from<br />
these diaries are used in this report.<br />
Family observations<br />
Nicki Karet from Rosenblatt Research returned to a number of families and spent several hours with<br />
them during the evening watching television and observing how the family interacted. These sessions<br />
provided detailed information about how different families negotiate viewing and resolve conflict over<br />
viewing.<br />
Parent groups<br />
Groups were commissioned with parents of children aged between four and 12 years. This was to<br />
enable a comparison to be drawn between children’s views, opinions and concerns and parental issues.<br />
By including some parents of children that took part in the research, it was possible to cross check<br />
responses and iron out any discrepancies.<br />
What Children Watch 101
Appendix 2: Sample<br />
Sample structure: phase I - children<br />
Trio/Group Gender Age Type of TV Location Date<br />
1 (trio) Boys 6-7 (yr 2) Digital Manchester 25 June 02<br />
2 (trio) Boys 7-8 (yr 3) Terrestrial London 27 June 02<br />
3 (trio) Girls 7-8 (yr 3) Digital Birmingham 26 June 02<br />
4 Girls 8-9 (yr 4) Digital Manchester 25 June 02<br />
5 Girls 10-11 (yr 5) Digital London 27 June 02<br />
6 Boys 11-12 (yr 6) Terrestrial Birmingham 26 June 02<br />
Sample structure: phase I - parents<br />
Group Gender Social Class Children’s Age Work Status Type of TV Location and Date<br />
1 Mothers C1C2 5–8 Working Terrestrial Manchester<br />
part/full-time<br />
25 June<br />
2 Mothers C2D 7–12 Working Terrestrial Birmingham<br />
full-time<br />
26 June<br />
3 Fathers BC1 4–12 Working Digital London<br />
full-time<br />
27 June<br />
Sample structure: phase 2 - children<br />
Trio/Group Gender Age Type of TV Location Date<br />
7(trio) Girls 6-7 (yr 2) Terrestrial Edinburgh 18 July 02<br />
8 Boys 9-10 (yr 5) Digital Edinburgh 18 July 02<br />
Sample structure: phase 2 - parents<br />
Group Gender Social Class Children’s Age Work Status Type of TV Location and Date<br />
4 Mothers BC1 2-6 Not working Digital Edinburgh 18 July<br />
Two family groups (reconvened from Stage 1)<br />
■ FAMILY ONE (1600 to 1800)<br />
Mothers (Father was at work)<br />
Five children - 11 year old girl with four older brothers aged 19, 16 (twins) and 13<br />
■ FAMILY TWO (1900 to 2100)<br />
Mother and Father<br />
Two girls aged 10 and six<br />
102<br />
What Children Watch
Appendix 3:<br />
Broadcasting Standards Commission<br />
The Broadcasting Standards Commission is the statutory body for both standards and fairness in<br />
broadcasting. It is the only organisation within the regulatory framework of UK broadcasting to cover all<br />
television and radio. This includes the BBC and commercial broadcasters, as well as text, cable, satellite<br />
and digital services.<br />
As an independent organisation, the Broadcasting Standards Commission considers the portrayal of<br />
violence, sexual conduct and matters of taste and decency. It also provides redress for people who<br />
believe they have been unfairly treated or subjected to unwarranted infringement of privacy. The<br />
Commission has three main tasks set out in the 1996 Broadcasting Act:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Produce codes of practice relating to standards and fairness;<br />
Consider and adjudicate on complaints;<br />
Monitor, research and report on standards and fairness in broadcasting.<br />
This report is published as part of a programme into attitudes towards issues and fairness in<br />
broadcasting. This research, which was carried out by independent experts, is not a statement of<br />
Commission policy. Its role is to offer guidance and practical information to Commissioners and<br />
broadcasters in their work.<br />
© 2003 Broadcasting Standards Commission. All rights reserved.<br />
What Children Watch 103
Appendix 4: The Independent<br />
Television Commission<br />
The Independent Television Commission licenses and regulates all television services broadcast<br />
in or from the United Kingdom, other than services funded by the BBC licence fee and S4C in Wales.<br />
It operates in the interest of viewers by: setting standards for programme content, advertising,<br />
sponsorship and technical quality; monitoring broadcasters’ output to ensure that it meets those<br />
standards and applying a range of penalties if it does not; ensuring that ITV1, Channel 4 and Channel 5<br />
fulfil their statutory public service obligations; planning frequency allocation and coverage for digital<br />
terrestrial services; ensuring that viewers can receive television services on fair and competitive terms;<br />
and investigating complaints and regularly publishing its findings.<br />
104<br />
What Children Watch
105
Broadcasting Standards Commission<br />
7 The Sanctuary<br />
London SW1P 3JS<br />
Tel 020 7808 1000<br />
Fax 020 7233 0397<br />
Email bsc@bsc.org.uk<br />
www.bsc.org.uk<br />
Independent Television Commission<br />
33 Foley Street<br />
London W1W 7TL<br />
Tel 020 7255 3000<br />
Fax 020 7306 7800<br />
Minicom 020 7306 7753<br />
Email publicaffairs@itc.org.uk<br />
www.itc.org.uk<br />
ISBN 1 872521 54 1