Jamaica: Macro-Socio-Economic and Environmental Assessment of ...
Jamaica: Macro-Socio-Economic and Environmental Assessment of ...
Jamaica: Macro-Socio-Economic and Environmental Assessment of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
50<br />
Based on the above information it is possible to assert that the disaster caused by hurricane<br />
Ivan in <strong>Jamaica</strong> can be described, in broad terms, as one that destroyed or damaged assets<br />
<strong>of</strong> housing, transport infrastructure, the environment <strong>and</strong> some permanent agricultural<br />
plantations, while at the same time imposing a decline in future agriculture <strong>and</strong> livestock<br />
<strong>and</strong> food processing production <strong>and</strong> in the tourism industry, as well as bringing about<br />
decreased revenues <strong>and</strong> increased operational costs <strong>of</strong> utilities in the electricity, water<br />
supply, telecommunications <strong>and</strong> transport sectors. In the following chapter, an analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the repercussions that these damages <strong>and</strong> losses will have on the macroeconomic position<br />
<strong>of</strong> the country will be presented.<br />
When the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the hurricane on the national economy <strong>and</strong><br />
the living conditions <strong>of</strong> the population are considered in their entirety, the perception that<br />
the country only sustained minor effects cannot be sustained. In fact, the figures provided<br />
above speak for themselves. Furthermore, the impact can more easily be understood when<br />
the analysis is carried down to the parish level 14 . A relatively high proportion <strong>of</strong> damage<br />
<strong>and</strong> losses were concentrated in the parishes <strong>of</strong> the southern parishes <strong>of</strong> Manchester, St.<br />
Elizabeth, Clarendon <strong>and</strong> St. Catherine, where the action <strong>of</strong> winds, storm surge, rains <strong>and</strong><br />
floods was stronger.<br />
It is also <strong>of</strong> interest to note that in 1988 hurricane Gilbert (See box) produced much higher<br />
impacts in <strong>Jamaica</strong>, <strong>and</strong> also to compare the impact <strong>of</strong> Ivan with that <strong>of</strong> other disasters that<br />
have occurred in the Caribbean area in the recent past. 15<br />
Table 6-2<br />
Selected natural disasters in the Caribbean <strong>and</strong> their impact<br />
Natural disaster Year Country Impact<br />
Gilbert 1988 <strong>Jamaica</strong> 65% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Hugo 1989 Montserrat 200% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Debbie 1994 St. Lucia 18% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Luis <strong>and</strong> Marilyn 1995 Antigua 65% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Luis <strong>and</strong> Marilyn 1995 St. Kitts <strong>and</strong> Nevis 85% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Georges 1998 St. Kitts <strong>and</strong> Nevis 50% <strong>of</strong> sugar harvest<br />
Lennny 1999 Barbuda 95% <strong>of</strong> primary sector GDP<br />
Michelle 2001 <strong>Jamaica</strong> 1% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Ivan 2004 Grenada 200% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Ivan 2004 <strong>Jamaica</strong> 8% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
Source: On the basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial information<br />
14 Not sufficient time was available to undertake a more detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the disaster<br />
impact at parish level.<br />
15 Prior to Hurricane Gilbert, <strong>Jamaica</strong> was affected by a Hurricane in 1980 <strong>and</strong> by floods<br />
in 1986 <strong>and</strong> 1991. The respective losses are estimated at 2%, 3% <strong>and</strong> 6% <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />
respectively. See, Charveriat, C. Natural Disasters in Latin America <strong>and</strong> the Caribbean: An<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> Risk. IDB, Working Paper #434, October 2000.<br />
50