EU funds for roads - CEDR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Page 58 / 80 The allocation of these funds by EU MS (15) was (originally) as follows (in € billion): - Belgium (B) 1.83 - Denmark (DK) 0.75 - Germany (D) 28.16 - Greece (EL) 20.96 - Spain (E) 43.09 - France (F) 14.62 - Ireland (IRL) 3.09 - Italy (I) 28.49 - Luxemburg (L) 0.08 - Netherlands (NL) 2.64 - Austria (A) 1.47 - Portugal (P) 19.03 - Finland (FIN) 1.84 - Sweden (S) 1.91 - United Kingdom (UK) 15.64 -------------------------- --------- TOTAL €183.60 billion Sructural & Cohesion funds 50 40 30 20 10 0 Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxemburg Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Sweden UK Fig. 24: Structural & Cohesion Fund grants to EU member states (2000–2006) o In the period 2007–2013 (2015), the amounts made available are (in € billion): - Objective 1: 76 279.2 - Objective 2: 49.1 - Objective 3: 7.8 ------------------ ---------------------- TOTAL : €336.1 billion 77 76 The enlargement of the EU has significantly increased the number of regions below the threshold at which the EU intervenes to help them catch-up. In the new MS, over 92% of the population lives in regions with a GDP/head below 75% of the EU average). This is why most of the available funds for the period 2007–2013 are going to Convergence Objective 1 regions. 77 This is almost one third of the total EU budget for the years 2007–2013! EU funds for roads
Page 59 / 80 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2000-2006 2007-2013 Structural & Cohesion Funds engaged Structural & Cohesion funds Fig. 25: Fig. 26: Rion-Antirrion bridge (Greece), which was co-funded by the ERDF EU funds for roads
Page 2 and 3:
Page 2 / 80 Authors: This report wa
Page 4 and 5:
Page 4 / 80 EU funds provide subsid
Page 6 and 7:
Page 6 / 80 Table of contents Execu
Page 8 and 9: Page 8 / 80 Of all the EU funds lis
Page 10 and 11: Page 10 / 80 1.1.2 EU funds for non
Page 12 and 13: Page 12 / 80 • Post-accession fun
Page 14 and 15: Page 14 / 80 25 20 15 10 2007-2013
Page 16 and 17: Page 16 / 80 - National governments
Page 18 and 19: Page 18 / 80 The EIB makes long-ter
Page 20 and 21: Page 20 / 80 In addition to its usu
Page 22 and 23: Page 22 / 80 Recent EIB initiatives
Page 24 and 25: Page 24 / 80 1.2 EU funds for roads
Page 26 and 27: Page 26 / 80 o Other Funds The Euro
Page 28 and 29: Page 28 / 80 - - - - PPP/concession
Page 30 and 31: Page 30 / 80 Considering the limits
Page 32 and 33: Page 32 / 80 Design Construction Ma
Page 34 and 35: Page 34 / 80 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Page 36 and 37: Page 36 / 80 Country profiles Annex
Page 38 and 39: Page 38 / 80 2008, 2009 application
Page 40 and 41: Page 40 / 80 2.1.1 The allocation o
Page 42 and 43: Page 42 / 80 Fig. 19: Estonia - E26
Page 44 and 45: Page 44 / 80 The competent EC Servi
Page 46 and 47: - The Page 46 / 80 After discussion
Page 48 and 49: Page 48 / 80 The preparation of a
Page 50 and 51: Page 50 / 80 Such issues are: ♦
Page 52 and 53: Page 52 / 80 Fig. 22: Slovenia - Be
Page 54 and 55: Page 54 / 80 - An analysis of the p
Page 56 and 57: Page 56 / 80 e) The eligibility of
Page 60 and 61: Page 60 / 80 ANNEX 2: Information o
Page 62 and 63: Page 62 / 80 ANNEX 3: Titles of cur
Page 64 and 65: Page 64 / 80 Once the EIB has becom
Page 66 and 67: Page 66 / 80 Funding of road projec
Page 80: Ref: CEDR report 2010/01 TDManageme
show all

EU funds for roads - CEDR

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?