04.06.2014 Views

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

should not perish, but have eternal life.” In postmodern thought, no truth is accepted as higher than<br />

another, thus the way that one person chooses to live or the way of life that one is born into (religion<br />

included,) is seen as a valid way to operate. This is where the “bridge” idea comes back into play. Bell<br />

responds to scripture in an anti-exclusive way, asserting that Jesus died for the sins of all people, no matter<br />

their nationality or religion. However, he does not give up the idea of truth found in scripture. In this way<br />

he is not wholly modern or wholly postmodern, but adopts a position that adopts and speaks to both sides.<br />

To use N.T. Wright’s “play” illustration again, Bell invokes humanity’s role in choosing the reality<br />

in which we live. According to Bell, Jesus died for the entire world, but it is up to the individual to choose<br />

which reality he or she chooses to accept. On page 146 of Velvet Elvis, he writes:<br />

“Heaven is full of people God loves, whom Jesus died for. Hell is full of forgiven people<br />

God loved, whom Jesus died for. The difference is how we choose to live, which story we<br />

choose to live in, which version of reality we trust.”<br />

In his article “An Emerging Critique of the Postmodern, Evangelical Church,” John Bolt critiques Bell’s<br />

stance and labels his way of thinking “postmodern constructivist theory.” This is a theory in which<br />

postmodernists detach human destiny from the will of the divine and place the “construction” of the story of<br />

humanity solely in the hands of the humans who live it. This is a radical position for many Christians who<br />

recognize a divine presence in the human story. Essentially what Bell is positing is that God has set up the<br />

rules of the game, but in no way does God force his creation to comply with the rules (much like the ideas<br />

of Jacobus Arminius, though Bell does not cite Arminius’ counter-Calvinist ideas in his work.) According to<br />

Bell, Jesus died for the sins of the world (a fact that most Christians would not deny,) but humanity exists<br />

with a will apart from God’s that make is possible (if not necessary) to make “our own story.”<br />

Rob Bell: Narrative Theology<br />

This is where Bell’s work adopts the postmodern bent toward the use and criticism of language as a<br />

means to express truth. Remember from the section on postmodernism that postmodern thinkers believe<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!