Plan for the Closure of Lanterman Developmental Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Attachment 4: STAKEHOLDERS/ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED January 29, 2010 – March 22, 2010 Immediately following the announcement of the recommendation to close of Lanterman Developmental Center, the Department began a process of informing and seeking input from all interested and involved stakeholders. This process took place in the form of face to face meetings, open forums, phone contacts, a scheduled public hearing and via email to obtain as much input as possible in the development of the plan. Below is a listing of individuals, agencies and organizations who were contacted directly by Department representatives during development of the plan. Consumer Organizations and Individuals including: • Residents Council at Lanterman • Consumers residing within the local Southern CA region • People First of California, Inc. • DDS Consumer Advisory Committee • ARCA Consumer Advisory Committee Parent Organizations and Individuals including: • Lanterman Families • California Association of State Hospital Parent Councils for the Retarded (CASH/PCR) • Lanterman Parents Coordinating Council (PCC) Board Members Employees and Employee Organizations including: • Lanterman Employees • California Association of Psychiatric Technicians • American Federation of State, County and Munici pal Employees • Union of American Physicians and Dentists • Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 • California Statewide Law Enforcement Association • International Union of Operating Engineers • Association of California State Supervisors • Professional Engineers in California Government Local, State and United States Government including: • Congresswoman Grace Napolitano (staff) • Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod • Senator Bob Huff (staff) • Assembly Member Norm a J. Torres • Assembly Member Anthony Adams ( staff) • Assembly Member Curt Hagman (staff) • Los Angeles County Supervisor Gloria M olina (staff) • Los Angeles County Chief Executive Officer • Pomona Mayor Elliott Rothman • Pomona City Councilman Tim S aunders • Pomona City Manager
Attachment 4: STAKEHOLDERS/ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED January 29, 2010 – March 22, 2010 • Pomona Redevelopment Director • Diamond Bar Councilma n Jack Tanaka • Pomona Chamber of Commerce • San Gabriel Valley Regional Chamber of Commerce • Orange County (staff) Provid er a nd Advocacy Organizat ions including: • Disability Rights Californ ia • State Council on Developmental Disabilities • Area Board 10 • Lanterman DC Advisory Board • Olmstead Advisory Committee • California Disability Community Action Net work (CDCAN) • The ARC of California • California Supported Living Network • ResCoalition • USC Children’s Hospita l Los Angeles • Respite Care Association • Family Resourc e Centers Network of California • Autism Society of California • California Association of H ealth Services at Home • California Disability Services Association • Community Residential Care Association of California • California Association of Health Facilities • Society of California Care Home Operators , Inc. • Developmental Services Network, Inc. • Alliance of California Autism Organizations Manag ed Care Plans located in Southern California includin g: • Molina Health Care • Healthnet • Inland Empire Health Plan • Kaiser • LA Care • Community Health Group Regional Center Organizations including: • Association of Regional Center Agencies (ARCA) Board of Directors • Eastern Los Angeles Regio nal Center • Harbor Regional Center • Inland Regional Center • Kern Regional Center • Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center • North Los Angeles Regio nal Center • Regional Center of Oran ge County • San Gabriel/Pomona R egional Center
Page 1 and 2:
California Health and Human Service
Page 3 and 4:
I. INTRODUCTION AND PLAN DEVELOPME
Page 5 and 6:
On February 24, 2010, a formal publ
Page 7 and 8:
II. LANTERMAN RESIDENTS The highe
Page 9 and 10: Extensive Personal Care: This need
Page 11 and 12: current health status. The resident
Page 13 and 14: to fill a critical gap in the exist
Page 15 and 16: The health care planning and develo
Page 17 and 18: completes a number of face-to-face
Page 19 and 20: Classifications A wide range of emp
Page 21 and 22: On behalf of Lanterman’s employee
Page 23 and 24: Department will implement a Departm
Page 25 and 26: low-income senior citizens who are
Page 27 and 28: uilding, an audiology building, was
Page 29 and 30: Lanterman’s physical and function
Page 31 and 32: • Residential and Programmatic Sp
Page 33 and 34: will also look at other factors tha
Page 35 and 36: V. IMPACT OF THE CLOSURE OF LANTER
Page 37 and 38: an example of how well-planned, ade
Page 39 and 40: VI. MAJOR IMPLEMENTATION STEPS AND
Page 41 and 42: VII. INPUT RECEIVED ON THE PLAN S
Page 43 and 44: The PowerPoint for the residents of
Page 45 and 46: DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER COSTS To the e
Page 47 and 48: IX. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1 Statutor
Page 49 and 50: Attachment 1 Welfare and Institutio
Page 51 and 52: STATE OF CALIFORNIA--HEALTH AND HUM
Page 57 and 58: Attachment 3
Page 59: Attachment 4
Page 71 and 72: LDC Classifications Identified by B
Page 73 and 74: LDC Classifications Identified by B
Page 77 and 78: Attachment 9: Surplus State Propert
Page 79 and 80: Attachment 9: Surplus State Propert
Page 83 and 84: THE PLAN The plan must talk about:
Page 85 and 86: Resident Input • What do you like
Page 87 and 88: THANK YOU 916-654-1888 If you have
Page 89 and 90: THE PLAN The plan must talk about:
Page 91 and 92: Consumer Input • If you were movi
Page 93: THANK YOU 916-654-1888 Nicole.Patte
show all

Plan for the Closure of Lanterman Developmental Center

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?