Student Seminar: Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems
Student Seminar: Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems
Student Seminar: Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Here in the first bracket we consider the terms with n 2 > n 1 +1, while the last bracket<br />
represents the result of action of H on terms with n 2 = n 1 + 1. Using periodicity<br />
conditions we are allowed to make shifts of the summation variables n 1 , n 2 in the<br />
first bracket to bring all the states to the uniform expression |n 1 , n 2 〉. We therefore<br />
get<br />
{<br />
H|ψ〉 = − J ∑<br />
a(n 1 − 1, n 2 )|n 1 , n 2 〉 +<br />
∑<br />
a(n 1 , n 2 − 1)|n 1 , n 2 〉<br />
2<br />
n 2 >n 1<br />
+ ∑<br />
n 2 >n 1 +2<br />
⎧<br />
⎨<br />
− J 2 ⎩<br />
∑<br />
1≤n 1≤L<br />
n 2>n 1+2<br />
a(n 1 + 1, n 2 )|n 1 , n 2 〉 + ∑<br />
a(n 1 , n 2 + 1)|n 1 , n 2 〉 + L − 8<br />
2<br />
n 2>n 1<br />
[<br />
a(n 1 , n 1 + 1)<br />
|n 1 , n 1 + 2〉 + |n 1 − 1, n 1 + 1〉 + L − 4<br />
2<br />
∑<br />
n 2 >n 1 +1<br />
] ⎫ ⎬<br />
|n 1 , n 1 + 1〉<br />
⎭ .<br />
a(n 1 , n 2 )|n 1 , n 2 〉<br />
Now we complete the sums in the first bracket to run the range n 2 > n 1 . This is<br />
achieved by adding <strong>and</strong> subtracting the missing terms. As the result we will get<br />
H|ψ〉 =<br />
{ ∑<br />
− J 2<br />
−<br />
− J 2 ⎩<br />
n 2>n 1<br />
(<br />
∑<br />
1≤n 1 ≤L<br />
⎧<br />
⎨<br />
a(n 1 − 1, n 2 ) + a(n 1 , n 2 − 1) + a(n 1 + 1, n 2 ) + a(n 1 , n 2 + 1) + L − 8 )<br />
a(n 1 , n 2 ) |n 1 , n 2 〉<br />
2<br />
(<br />
a(n 1 , n 1 )|n 1 , n 1 + 1〉 + a(n 1 + 1, n 1 + 1)|n 1 , n 1 + 1〉 +<br />
+ a(n 1 , n 1 + 1)|n 1 , n 1 + 2〉<br />
} {{ } + a(n 1, n 1 + 2)|n 1 , n 1 + 2〉<br />
} {{ } +L − 8<br />
) }<br />
a(n 1 , n 1 + 1)|n 1 , n 1 + 1〉<br />
2<br />
∑<br />
1≤n 1≤L<br />
[<br />
a(n 1 , n 1 + 1) |n 1 , n 1 + 2〉 + |n 1 − 1, n 1 + 1〉<br />
} {{ } +L − 4<br />
] ⎫ ⎬<br />
|n 1 , n 1 + 1〉<br />
2<br />
⎭ .<br />
The underbraced terms cancel out <strong>and</strong> we finally get<br />
H|ψ〉 =<br />
{ ∑<br />
− J 2<br />
⎧<br />
⎨<br />
+ J 2 ⎩<br />
n 2 >n 1<br />
(<br />
∑<br />
1≤n 1 ≤L<br />
}<br />
a(n 1 − 1, n 2 ) + a(n 1 , n 2 − 1) + a(n 1 + 1, n 2 ) + a(n 1 , n 2 + 1) + L − 8 )<br />
a(n 1 , n 2 ) |n 1 , n 2 〉<br />
2<br />
⎫<br />
(<br />
) ⎬<br />
a(n 1 , n 1 ) + a(n 1 + 1, n 1 + 1) − 2a(n 1 , n 1 + 1) |n 1 , n 1 + 1〉<br />
⎭ .<br />
If we impose the requirement that<br />
a(n 1 , n 1 ) + a(n 1 + 1, n 1 + 1) − 2a(n 1 , n 1 + 1) = 0 (5.1)<br />
then the second bracket in the eigenvalue equation vanishes <strong>and</strong> the eigenvalue problem<br />
reduces to the following equation<br />
2(E − E 0 )a(n 1 , n 2 ) = J [ 4a(n 1 , n 2 ) − ∑<br />
a(n 1 + σ, n 2 ) + a(n 1 , n 2 + σ) ] . (5.2)<br />
σ=±1<br />
Substituting in eq.(5.1) the Bethe ansatz for a(n 1 , n 2 ) we get<br />
Ae (p 1+p 2 )n + Be i(p 1+p 2 )n + Ae (p 1+p 2 )(n+1) + Be i(p 1+p 2 )(n+1)<br />
(<br />
)<br />
− 2 Ae i(p 1n+p 2 (n+1)) + Be i(p 2n+p 1 (n+1))<br />
= 0 .<br />
}<br />
– 63 –