27.08.2014 Views

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXAMPLES OF BANACH SPACE TECHNIQUES 107<br />

are clearly satisfied, &J is not empty since it contains (M,J), <strong>and</strong> so the Hausdorff<br />

maximality theorem asserts the existence of a maximal totally ordered<br />

subcollection n of &J.<br />

Let be the collection of all M' such that (M',I') E n. Then is totally<br />

ordered, by set inclusion, <strong>and</strong> therefore the union M of all members of is a<br />

subspace of X. (Note that in general the union of two subspaces is not a<br />

subspace. An example is two planes through the origin in R3.) If x E M, then<br />

x E M' for some M' E ; define F(x) = I'(x), where I' is the function which<br />

occurs in the pair (M',I') E n. Our definition of the partial order in n shows<br />

that it is immaterial which M' E we choose to define F(x), as long as M'<br />

contains x.<br />

It is now easy to check that F is a linear functional on M, with IIFII = 1.<br />

If M were a proper subspace X, the first part of the proof would give us a<br />

further extension of F, <strong>and</strong> this would contradict the maximality of n. Thus<br />

M = X, <strong>and</strong> the proof is complete for the case of real scalars.<br />

If now f is a complex-linear functional on the subspace M of the complex<br />

normed linear space X, let u be the real part off, use the real Hahn-Banach<br />

theorem to extend u to a real-linear functional U on X, with IIUII = Ilull, <strong>and</strong><br />

define<br />

F(x) = U(x) - iU(ix) (x EX). (6)<br />

By Proposition 5.17, F is a complex-linear extension off, <strong>and</strong><br />

This completes the proof.<br />

IIFII = IIUII = Ilull = Ilfli.<br />

IIII<br />

Let us mention two important consequences of the Hahn-Banach theorem:<br />

5.19 Theorem Let M be a linear subspace of a normed linear space X, <strong>and</strong> let<br />

Xo E X. Then Xo is in the closure M of M if <strong>and</strong> only if there is no bounded<br />

linear functional f on X such that f(x) = 0 for all x E M but f(xo) # o.<br />

PROOF If Xo E M, f is a bounded linear functional on X, <strong>and</strong> f(x) = 0 for all<br />

x E M, the continuity offshows that we also havef(xo) = O.<br />

Conversely, suppose Xo f/ M. Then there exists a {j > 0 such that<br />

IIx - xoll > {j for all x E M. Let M' be the subspace generated by M <strong>and</strong> xo,<br />

<strong>and</strong> definef(x + AXo) = A if x E M <strong>and</strong> A is a scalar. Since<br />

{j I AI ~ I A I II Xo + r 1 x II = II AXo + x II ,<br />

we see that f is a linear functional on M' whose norm is at most {j -1. Also<br />

f(x) = 0 on M,J(xo) = 1. The Hahn-Banach theorem allows us to extend this<br />

ffrom M' to X.<br />

IIII<br />

5.20 Theorem If X is a normed linear space <strong>and</strong> if Xo E X, Xo # 0, there is a<br />

bounded linear functionalfon X, of norm 1, so thatf(xo) = Ilxoll·

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!