27.08.2014 Views

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS<br />

for any n <strong>and</strong> any disjoint collection of segments (lXI' PI), ... , (IXn, Pn) in I<br />

whose lengths satisfy<br />

n<br />

L (P; - lXi) < fJ. (2)<br />

;= I<br />

Such anfis obviously continuous: simply take n = 1.<br />

In the following theorem, the implication (b)-+ (c) is probably the most<br />

interesting. That (a) -+ (c) without assuming monotonicity off is the content<br />

of Theorem 7.20.<br />

7.18 Tbeorem Let I = [a, b], let f: 1-+ RI be continuous <strong>and</strong> nondecreasing.<br />

Each of the following three statements about f implies the other two:<br />

(a) fis AC on I.<br />

(b) fmaps sets of measure 0 to sets of measure O.<br />

(c) fis differentiable a.e. on I,f' E E, <strong>and</strong><br />

f(x) - f(a) = IX !'(t) dt (IX :s; X :s; b). (1)<br />

Note that the functions constructed in Example 7.16(b) map certain compact<br />

sets of measure 0 onto the whole unit interval!<br />

Exercise 12 complements this theorem.<br />

PROOF We will show that (a)-+ (b)-+ (c)-+ (a).<br />

Let Wi denote the u-algebra of all Lebesgue measurable subsets of RI.<br />

Assumefis AC on I, pick E c: I so that E E Wi <strong>and</strong> m(E) :;: O. We have to<br />

show thatf(E) E Wi <strong>and</strong> m(f(E)) = O. Without loss of generality, assume that<br />

neither a nor b lie in E.<br />

Choose E > O. Associate fJ > 0 to f <strong>and</strong> E, as in Definition 7.17. There is<br />

then an open set V with m(V) < fJ, so that E c: V c: I. Let (IX;, PJ be the<br />

disjoint segments whose union is V. Then L (P; - IXI) < fJ, <strong>and</strong> our choice of fJ<br />

shows that therefore<br />

L (f(P;) - f(IX;)) :s; E. (2)<br />

;<br />

[Definition 7.17 was stated in terms of finite sums; thus (2) holds for every<br />

partial sum of the (possibly) infinite series, hence (2) holds also for the sum of<br />

the whole series, as stated.]<br />

Since E c: V,f(E) c: U [f(IX;),f(P;)]. The Lebesgue measure of this union<br />

is the left side of (2). This says that f(E) is a subset of Borel sets of arbitrarily<br />

small measure. Since Lebesgue measure.is complete, it follows thatf(E) E Wi<br />

<strong>and</strong> m(f(E)) = O.<br />

We have now proved that (a) implies (b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!