27.08.2014 Views

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ELEMENTARY THEORY OF BANACH ALGEBRAS 367<br />

PROOF Let B be the closure in C = C(T) of the set of all functions of the form<br />

The theorem asserts that B = C. Let us assume B :F C.<br />

The set of all functions (3) (note that N is not fixed) is a complex algebra.<br />

Its closure B is a Banach algebra which contains the function fo, where<br />

fo(e i '1 = e ilJ • Our assumption that B :F C implies that lifo ~ B, for otherwise B<br />

would contain f'O for all integers n, hence all trigonometric polynomials<br />

would be in B; <strong>and</strong> since the trigonometric polynomials are dense in C<br />

(Theorem 4.25) we should have B = C.<br />

So fo is not invertible in B. By Theorem 18.17 there is a complex homomorphism<br />

h of B such that h(fo) = O. Every homomorphism onto the<br />

complex field satisfies h(l) = 1; <strong>and</strong> since h(fo) = 0, we also have<br />

h(f'O) = [h(foW = 0 (n = 1, 2, 3, ... ). (4)<br />

We know that h is a linear functional on B, of norm at most 1. The<br />

Hahn-Banach theorem extends h to a linear functional on C (still denoted by<br />

h) of the same norm. Since h(l) = 1 <strong>and</strong> IIhll ~ 1, the argument used in Sec.<br />

5.22 shows that h is a positive linear functional on C. In particular, h(f) is<br />

real for real f; hence h(j) = h(f). Since f 0" II is the complex conjugate of f'O, it<br />

follows that (4) also holds for n = -1, -2, -3, .... Thus<br />

I if n = 0,<br />

{<br />

h(f'O) = 0 if n of o.<br />

(5)<br />

Since the trigonometric polynomials are dense in C, there is only one<br />

bounded linear functional on C which satisfies (5). Hence h is given by the<br />

formula<br />

(3)<br />

(fe C). (6)<br />

Now if n is a positive integer, gf'O e B; <strong>and</strong> since h is mUltiplicative on B,<br />

(6) gives<br />

g( - n) = ~ I" g(e i '1e illlJ dO = h(gf'O) = h(g)h(f'O) = 0, (7)<br />

21t _"<br />

by (5). This contradicts the hypothesis of the theorem.<br />

We conclude with a theorem due to Wiener.<br />

18.21 Theorem Suppose<br />

IIII<br />

00 00<br />

f(e i '1 = L c II e'"IJ, L IcIII < 00, (1)<br />

-00 -00

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!