27.08.2014 Views

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328 REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS<br />

Construction of a Modular Function<br />

16.17 The Modular Group This is the set G of all linear fractional transformations<br />

(() of the form<br />

(()(z) = az + b<br />

cz + d<br />

where a, b, c, <strong>and</strong> d are integers <strong>and</strong> ad - be = 1.<br />

Since a, b, c, <strong>and</strong> d are real, each (() E G maps the real axis onto itself (except<br />

for (0). The imaginary part of (()(i) is (c 2 + d 2 )-1 > O. Hence<br />

(()(II+) = II+ «(() E G), (2)<br />

where II+ is the open upper half plane. If (() is given by (1), then<br />

-1() dw - b<br />

(() w = -cw+ a<br />

(3)<br />

so that (()-1 E G. Also (() 0 '" E G if (() E G <strong>and</strong>", E G.<br />

Thus G is a group, with composition as group operation. In view of (2) it is<br />

customary to regard G as a group of transformations on II + .<br />

The transformations z-+ z + 1 (a = b = d = 1, c = 0) <strong>and</strong> z-+ -liz<br />

(a = d = 0, b = -1, c = 1) belong to G. In fact, they generate G (i.e., there is no<br />

proper subgroup of G which contains these two transformations). This can be<br />

proved by the same method which will be used in Theorem 16.19(c).<br />

A modular function is a holomorphic (or meromorphic) function f on II+<br />

which is invariant under G or at least under some nontrivial subgroup r of G.<br />

This means thatf 0 (() = ffor every (() E r.<br />

16.18 A Subgroup We shall take for r the group generated by a <strong>and</strong> -r, where<br />

z<br />

a(z) = 2z + l' -r(z) = z + 2. (1)<br />

One of our objectives is the construction of a certain function A. which is invariant<br />

under r <strong>and</strong> which leads to a quick proof of the Picard theorem. Actually, it<br />

is the mapping properties of A. which are important in this proof, not its invariance,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a quicker construction (using just the Riemann mapping theorem <strong>and</strong><br />

the reflection principle) can be given. But it is instructive to study the action of r<br />

on II+, in geometric terms, <strong>and</strong> we shall proceed along this route.<br />

Let Q be the set of all z which satisfy the following four conditions, where<br />

z = x + iy:<br />

y>O, -1:::;; x < 1, 12z + 11 ~ 1, 12z-11>1. (2)<br />

Q is bounded by the vertical lines x = - 1 <strong>and</strong> x = 1 <strong>and</strong> is bounded below<br />

by two semicircles of radius t, with centers at -! <strong>and</strong> at t. Q contains those of<br />

its boundary points which lie in the left half of II +. Q contains no point of the<br />

real axis.<br />

(1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!