27.08.2014 Views

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

Real and Complex Analysis (Rudin)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

344 REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS<br />

17.17 Theorem Suppose 0 < p ~ 00, f E HP, <strong>and</strong> f is not identically O. Then<br />

log I f* I E L 1 (n, the outer function<br />

Qf(Z) = exp -2<br />

n -" e<br />

{If" e it + Z .}<br />

~ log I f*(e'~ I dt<br />

is in HP, <strong>and</strong> there is an inner function M f such that<br />

Z<br />

(1)<br />

(2)<br />

Furthermore,<br />

log I f(O) I ~ 2n 1 f" _}Og I f*(ei~ I dt. (3)<br />

Equality holds in (3) if <strong>and</strong> only if M f is constant.<br />

The functions M f <strong>and</strong> Qf are called the inner <strong>and</strong> outer factors off, respectively;<br />

Qf depends only on the boundary values of I f I.<br />

PROOF We assume first that f E HI. If B is the Blaschke product formed with<br />

the zeros of f <strong>and</strong> if g = fiB, Theorem 17.9 shows that g E HI; <strong>and</strong> since<br />

I g* I = I f* I a.e. on T, it suffices to prove the theorem with g in place off<br />

So let us assume that f has no zero in U <strong>and</strong> that f(O) = 1. Then log I f I<br />

is harmonic in U, log I f(O)l = 0, <strong>and</strong> since log = log+ - log-, the mean<br />

value property of harmonic functions implies that<br />

1 f" . 1 f" .<br />

2n _}og- If(re'~1 dO = 2n _}Og+ If(re'~ dO ~ IIfllo ~ IIflll (4)<br />

for 0 < r < 1. It now follows from Fatou's lemma that both log+ I f* I <strong>and</strong><br />

log- I f* I are in L 1 (n, hence so is log I f* I.<br />

This shows that the definition (1) makes sense. By Theorem 17.16, Qf E<br />

HI. Also, I QJI = If* I =F 0 a.e., since log If* IE Ll(n. If we can prove that<br />

(z E U), (5)<br />

thenflQf will be an inner function, <strong>and</strong> we obtain the factorization (2).<br />

Since log I Qf I is the Poisson integral of log I f* I, (5) is equivalent to the<br />

inequality<br />

log If I ~ P[log If*I], (6)<br />

which we shall now prove. Our notation is as in Chap. 11: P[h] is the<br />

Poisson integral of the function h E L 1 (T).<br />

For I Z I ~ 1 <strong>and</strong> 0 < R < 1, putfR(Z) = f(Rz). Fix Z E U. Then<br />

log I fR(Z) I = P[log+ I fR I ](z) - P[log- I fR I ](z). (7)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!